Comparing i-gel and Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients
Gui-Zhen Yang, Fu-Shan Xue, Hui-Xian Li, Ya-Yang Liu, Gui-Zhen Yang, Fu-Shan Xue, Hui-Xian Li, Ya-Yang Liu
Abstract
[No Abstract Available].
References
- Alzahem AM, Aqil M, Alzahrani TA, Aljazaeri AH. Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures. A randomized controlled trial. Saudi Med J. 2017;38:482–490.
- Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Luepold B, Stucki F, Seiler S, Urwyler N, et al. Performance of the pediatric-sized i-gel compared with the AmbuAuraOnce laryngeal mask in anesthetized and ventilated children. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:102–110.
- Goyal R. Small is the new big: An overview of newer supraglottic airways for children. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31:440–449.
- Li CW, Xue FS, Xu YC, Liu Y, Mao P, Liu KP, Yang QY, Zhang GH, Sun HT. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeallaryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1195–1198.
- Intersurgical. Airway management. [[Updated 2017; Accessed 2017 October 6]]. Available from: .
- Ambu.com.Airway management. [[Updated 2017; Accessed 2017 October 6]]. Available from: .
- Aqil M, Delvi B, Abujamea A, Alzahrani T, Alzahem A, Mansoor S, et al. Spatial relationship of i-gel®and Ambu®AuraOnceTM on pediatric airway: a randomized comparison based on three dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83:23–32.
- Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Chang E, Sawardekar A. A cohort evaluation of the laryngeal mask airway-Supreme™in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:759–764.
- Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:528–531.
Source: PubMed