PANSAID-PAracetamol and NSAID in combination: detailed statistical analysis plan for a randomised, blinded, parallel, four-group multicentre clinical trial

Kasper Højgaard Thybo, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Daniel Hägi-Pedersen, Niels Anker Pedersen, Jørgen Berg Dahl, Henrik Morville Schrøder, Hans Henrik Bülow, Jan Gottfrid Bjørck, Søren Overgaard, Ole Mathiesen, Jørn Wetterslev, Kasper Højgaard Thybo, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Daniel Hägi-Pedersen, Niels Anker Pedersen, Jørgen Berg Dahl, Henrik Morville Schrøder, Hans Henrik Bülow, Jan Gottfrid Bjørck, Søren Overgaard, Ole Mathiesen, Jørn Wetterslev

Abstract

Background: Effective postoperative pain management is essential for the rehabilitation of the surgical patient. The PANSAID trial evaluates the analgesic effects and safety of the combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen. This paper describes in detail the statistical analysis plan for the primary publication to prevent outcome reporting bias and data-driven analysis results.

Methods/design: The PANSAID trial is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, parallel, four-group clinical trial comparing the beneficial and harmful effects of different doses and combinations of paracetamol and ibuprofen in patients having total hip arthroplastic surgery. Patients, caregivers, physicians, investigators, and statisticians are blinded to the intervention. The two co-primary outcomes are 24-h consumption of morphine and proportion of patients with one or more serious adverse events within 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are pain scores during mobilisation and at rest at 6 and 24 h postoperatively, and the proportion of patients with one or more adverse events within 24 h postoperatively.

Discussion: PANSAID will provide a large trial with low risk of bias regarding benefits and harms of the combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen used in a perioperative setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.org identifier: NCT02571361 . Registered on 7 October 2015.

Keywords: Benefit; Detailed statistical analysis plan; Harm; Ibuprofen; Multimodal analgesia; Paracetamol; Postoperative pain; Randomised controlled trial; Total hip arthroplasty.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The PANSAID trial was approved by the Regional Ethics Commitee, Region Zealand, SJ-462, on 30 June 2015 (which covers all trial sites), approved by the Danish Medicines Agency, journal no. 2015053406, EudraCT: 2015-002239-16 on 12 August 2015, and approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency, REG-33-2015, on 30 June 2015.

All participants considered for the trial will be provided with written and oral information on the trial so that the participants can make an informed decision about their participation in the trial. Written information and the consent form are approved by the Ethics Committee. This consent form must be signed by the participant and by the investigator seeking the consent. Patients will only be enrolled after written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT Flow-diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SPIRIT figure: PANSAID

References

    1. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003;362:1921–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5.
    1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:189–98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a.
    1. Aasvang EK, Luna IE, Kehlet H. Challenges in postdischarge function and recovery: the case of fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:861–6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev170.
    1. Dahl JB, Nielsen RV, Wetterslev J, Nikolajsen L, Hamunen K, Kontinen VK, Hansen MS, Kjer JJ, Mathiesen O. Scandinavian Postoperative Pain Alliance: post-operative analgesic effects of paracetamol, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, gabapentinoids and their combinations: a topical review. Acta Aanaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:1165–81. doi: 10.1111/aas.12382.
    1. Mathiesen O, Wetterslev J, Kontinen VK, Pommergaard HC, Nikolajsen L, Rosenberg J, Hansen MS, Hamunen K, Kjer JJ, Dahl JB. Adverse effects of perioperative paracetamol, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, gabapentinoids and their combinations: a topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:1182–98. doi: 10.1111/aas.12380.
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation Guideline for International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6 (R1). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. 1996. . Accessed 18 Feb 2016.
    1. Finfer S, Bellomo R. Why publish statistical analysis plans? Crit Care Resusc. 2009;11:5–6.
    1. Thybo KH, Hägi-Pedersen D, Wetterslev J, Dahl JB, Schrøder HM, Bülow HH, Bjørck JG, Mathiesen O. PANSAID – PAracetamol and NSAID in combination: study protocol for a randomised trial. Trials. 2017;18:11.
    1. Hansen MS, Petersen EE, Dahl JB, Wetterslev J. Post-operative serious adverse events in a mixed surgical population—a retrospective register study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:1209–21. doi: 10.1111/aas.12762.
    1. Dupont WD, Plummer WD., Jr Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:116–28. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90005-M.
    1. Lehmann EL. Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks. New York; Springer; 1998. p. 76–81.
    1. Hojer Karlsen AP, Geisler A, Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Postoperative pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Pain. 2015;156:8–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000003.
    1. Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:3–15. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800102.
    1. Garson GD: Missing values analysis and data imputation. Asheboro: Statistical Associates Publishers; 2015.
    1. Qu Y, Zhao YD, Rahardja D. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test: stratify or not? J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18:1103–11. doi: 10.1080/10543400802369103.
    1. Kahan BC, Harhay MO. Many multicenter trials had few events per center, requiring analysis via random-effects models or GEEs. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:1504–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.016.
    1. STATA manual. . Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
    1. Gotzsche PC. Blinding during data analysis and writing of manuscripts. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:285–90. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00263-4.
    1. Fabritius ML, Mathiesen O, Wetterslev J, Dahl JB. Post-operative analgesia: focus has been on benefit—are we forgetting the harm? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:839–41. doi: 10.1111/aas.12729.
    1. Fabritius ML, Wetterslev J, Dahl JB, Mathiesen O. An urgent call for improved quality of trial design and reporting in postoperative pain research. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61:8–10. doi: 10.1111/aas.12820.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe