Improving the appropriateness of antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an academic detailing intervention

L Desveaux, M Saragosa, J Rogers, L Bevan, H Loshak, A Moser, S Feldman, L Regier, L Jeffs, N M Ivers, L Desveaux, M Saragosa, J Rogers, L Bevan, H Loshak, A Moser, S Feldman, L Regier, L Jeffs, N M Ivers

Abstract

Background: In 2014, nursing home administration and government officials were facing increasing public and media scrutiny around the variation of antipsychotic medication (APM) prescribing across Ontario nursing homes. In response, policy makers partnered to test an academic detailing (AD) intervention to address appropriate prescribing of APM in nursing homes in a cluster-randomized trial. This mixed-methods study aimed to explore how and why the AD intervention may have resulted in changes in the nursing home context. The objectives were to understand how the intervention was implemented, explore contextual factors associated with implementation, and examine impact of the intervention on prescribing.

Methods: Administrative data for the primary outcome of the full randomized trial will not be available for a minimum of 1 year. Therefore, this paper reports the findings of a planned, quantitative interim trial analysis assessed mean APM dose and prescribing prevalence at baseline and 3 and 6 months across 40 nursing homes (18 intervention, 22 control). Patient-level administrative data regarding prescribing were analyzed using generalized linear mixed effects regression. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nursing home staff from the intervention group to explore opinions and experiences of the AD intervention. Interviews were analyzed using the framework method, with constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) applied as pre-defined deductive codes. Open coding was applied when emerging themes did not align with CFIR constructs. Qualitative and quantitative findings were triangulated to examine points of divergence to understand how the intervention may work and to identify areas for future opportunities and areas for improvement.

Results: No significant differences were observed in prescribing outcomes. A total of 22 interviews were conducted, including four academic detailers and 18 nursing home staff. Constructs within the CFIR domains of Outer Setting, Inner Setting, and Characteristics of Individuals presented barriers to antipsychotic prescribing. Intervention Source, Evidence Strength and Quality, and Adaptability explained participant engagement in the AD intervention; nursing homes that exhibited a Tension for Change and Leadership Engagement reported positive changes in processes and communication.

Conclusions: Participants described their experiences with the intervention against the backdrop of a range of factors that influence APM prescribing in nursing homes that exist at the system, facility, provider, and resident levels. In this context, the perceived credibility and flexibility of the intervention were critical features that explained engagement with and potential impact of the intervention. Development of a common language across the team to enable communication was reported as a proximal outcome that may eventually have an effect on APM prescribing rates. Process evaluations may be useful during early stages of evaluation to understand how the intervention is working and how it might work better. Qualitative results suggest the lack of early changes observed in prescribing may reflect the number of upstream factors that need to change for APM rates to decrease.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02604056.

Keywords: Academic detailing; Antipsychotic medication; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Inappropriate prescribing; Mixed methods; Nursing home.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Academic detailing intervention key messages
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Longitudinal prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing

References

    1. Rolland Y, Aquino JP, Andrieu S, et al. Identification of the main domains for quality of care and clinical research in nursing homes. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011;15(5):410–424. doi: 10.1007/s12603-011-0091-8.
    1. Roth MT, Ivey JL. Self-reported medication use in community-residing older adults: a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005;3(3):196–204. doi: 10.1016/S1543-5946(05)80026-1.
    1. Fick D, Semla T, Beizer J, et al. American Geriatrics Society 2015 updated beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2227–2246. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13702.
    1. Cool C, Cestac P, Laborde C, et al. Potentially inappropriate drug prescribing and associated factors in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(11):850. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.08.003.
    1. Loganathan M, Singh S, Franklin BD, Bottle A, Majeed A. Interventions to optimise prescribing in care homes: systematic review. Age Ageing. 2011;40(2):150–162. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq161.
    1. Tjia J, Velten SJ, Parsons C, Valluri S, Briesacher BA. Studies to reduce unnecessary medication use in frail older adults: a systematic review. Drugs Aging. 2013;30(5):285–307. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0064-1.
    1. Kaufmann CP, Tremp R, Hersberger KE, Lampert ML. Inappropriate prescribing: a systematic overview of published assessment tools. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1575-8.
    1. Hanlon JT, Aspinall SL, Handler SM, et al. Potentially suboptimal prescribing for older veteran nursing home patients with dementia. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49(1):20–28. doi: 10.1177/1060028014558484.
    1. Bonner AF, Field TS, Lemay CA, et al. Rationales that providers and family members cited for the use of antipsychotic medications in nursing home residents with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(2):302–308. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13230.
    1. Geller AI, Nopkhun W, Dows-Martinez MN, Strasser DC. Polypharmacy and the role of physical medicine and rehabilitation. PM R. 2012;4(3):198–219. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.02.012.
    1. Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(1):57–65. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.827660.
    1. Beers MH, Ouslander JG, Fingold SF, et al. Inappropriate medication prescribing in skilled-nursing facilities. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(8):684–689. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-8-684.
    1. Garcia-Gollarte F, Baleriola-Julvez J, Ferrero-Lopez I, Cuenllas-Diaz A, Cruz-Jentoft A. An educational intervention on drug use in nursing homes improves health outcomes resource utilization and reduces inappropriate drug prescription. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(12):885–891. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.04.010.
    1. Kroger E, Wilchesky M, Marcotte M, et al. Medication use among nursing home residents with severe dementia: identifying categories of appropriateness and elements of a successful intervention. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(7):629. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.04.002.
    1. O’Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD000409.
    1. Ray WA, Taylor JA, Meador KG, et al. Reducing antipsychotic drug use in nursing homes. A controlled trial of provider education. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(6):713–721. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410060023005.
    1. Tjia J, Field T, Lemay C, et al. Antipsychotic use in nursing homes varies by psychiatric consultant. Med Care. 2014;52(3):267–271. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000076.
    1. Desveaux L, Gomes T, Tadrous M, et al. Appropriate prescribing in nursing homes demonstration project (APDP) study protocol: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial and mixed methods process evaluation of an Ontario policy-maker initiative to improve appropriate prescribing of antipsychotics. Implement Sci. 2016;11:45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0410-x.
    1. Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Principles of educational outreach (‘academic detailing’) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990;263(4):549–556. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440040088034.
    1. Chhina HK, Bhole VM, Goldsmith C, Hall W, Kaczorowski J, Lacaille D. Effectiveness of academic detailing to optimize medication prescribing behaviour of family physicians. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;16(4):511–529. doi: 10.18433/J3KK6C.
    1. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
    1. Sketris IS, Langille Ingram EM, Lummis HL. Strategic opportunities for effective optimal prescribing and medication management. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;16(1):e103–e125.
    1. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
    1. Smith J, Firth J. Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):52–62. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284.
    1. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 11, 2015.
    1. Kidder L, Judd C. Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston; 1986.
    1. Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L. A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci. 2016;11:72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z.
    1. Marshall M, de Silva D, Cruickshank L, et al. What we know about designing an effective improvement intervention (but too often fail to put into practice). BMJ Qual Saf. 2016. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006143.
    1. Tjia J, Gurwitz JH, Briesacher BA. Challenge of changing nursing home prescribing culture. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012;10(1):37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.12.005.
    1. Rojas-Fernandez C, Mikhail M, Brown SG. Psychotropic and cognitive-enhancing medication use and its documentation in contemporary long-term care practice. Ann Pharmacother. 2014;48(4):438–446. doi: 10.1177/1060028013520196.
    1. Golden SD, Earp JA. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39(3):364–372. doi: 10.1177/1090198111418634.
    1. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) Implement Sci. 2013;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-51.
    1. Yeh JS, Van Hoof TJ, Fischer MA. Key features of academic detailing: development of an expert consensus using the Delphi method. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016;9(1):42–50.
    1. Bell HT, Steinsbekk A, Granas AG. Factors influencing prescribing of fall-risk-increasing drugs to the elderly: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(2):107–114. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1041829.
    1. Anthierens S, Tansens A, Petrovic M, Christiaens T. Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-65.
    1. Frich JC, Hoye S, Lindbaek M, Straand J. General practitioners and tutors’ experiences with peer group academic detailing: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-12.
    1. Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1013. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1013.
    1. Wieringa S, Greenhalgh T. 10 years of mindlines: a systematic review and commentary. Implement Sci. 2015;10:45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0229-x.
    1. Ellis ML, Molinari V, Dobbs D, Smith K, Hyer K. Assessing approaches and barriers to reduce antipsychotic drug use in Florida nursing homes. Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(6):507–516. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.952710.
    1. French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-38.
    1. Information CIfH. Trend over time: potentially inappropriate use of antipsychotics in long-term care (percentage). 2016; . Accessed 23 Jan 2017.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe