Pragmatic Cluster Trial for Nursing Home Antipsychotic Prescribing

March 22, 2018 updated by: Women's College Hospital

Ontario Appropriate Prescribing Demonstration Project: Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial to Reduce Antipsychotic Medication Prescribing in Long-Term Care Homes

Two arm, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial, with nursing homes allocated to the full, active intervention (featuring educational outreach offered to each prescriber and team members in the home) or standard quality improvement supports (including online audit and feedback reports for each prescriber in the home). The 'standard' quality improvement supports represent 'usual care' as these are to be launched province-wide; a concurrent control arm with no exposure to a quality improvement intervention is not feasible.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and Ontario Medical Association have initiated a project aiming to improve appropriateness of prescribing in long-term care facilities (aka nursing homes) through integrated educational supports for nursing home prescribers, inter-professional care teams, as well as residents and family members. The first focus of the project is appropriate prescribing of antipsychotic medications. Working with Health Quality Ontario, the policy makers have determined that all prescribers will have the opportunity to review practice reports detailing their prescribing performance for this class of medication (aka audit and feedback).

The primary question of this pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial is: What is the effect of adding educational outreach compared to the 'usual' quality improvement supports (i.e. audit and feedback) on prescribing of antipsychotic medications in long-term care?

Secondary questions include the following:

i. What is the effect of the intervention on acute care utilization (e.g., emergency room) rates? ii. What is the effect of the intervention on incidence of patient clinical outcomes and/or adverse effects associated with antipsychotic medications (e.g., falls, aggressive behaviours)? iii. What is the effect of the interventions on medications that might be used as alternatives to antipsychotic medications (e.g., benzodiazepines)? iv. What is the cost-benefit, focusing on prescribing outcomes?

Process evaluation questions include the following:

  1. How and why do the interventions work as observed?
  2. Was the intervention implemented as desired in nursing homes?
  3. What were the contextual factors associated with implementation?
  4. Do the interventions affect precursors of behaviour (e.g., motivation, capability)?

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Nursing homes within pre-determined regions of Ontario that expressed an interest in the full intervention (the regions, or hubs, contain a wide variety of nursing home types within a reasonable travel distance [i.e., <100 km])
  • Nursing homes within the hubs in which the medical and administrative leads agree to and support the project

Exclusion criteria:

  • Nursing homes with a previous or ongoing involvement in externally supported quality improvement initiatives focusing on antipsychotic medications
  • Nursing homes without any prescribers caring for at least 10 residents routinely
  • Nursing homes with fewer than 30 residents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Audit + Feedback
'Usual care' / standard quality improvement supports (including online Audit and Feedback reports for each prescriber in the home)
Online Audit + Feedback practice reports detailing prescribing performance for this class of medication for each prescriber in the nursing home. (Details: http://www.hqontario.ca/Quality-Improvement/Practice-Reports/Primary-Care)
Experimental: Audit + Feedback + Educational Outreach
'Active/full' intervention (featuring Educational Outreach offered to each prescriber and team members in the home)
Online Audit + Feedback practice reports detailing prescribing performance for this class of medication for each prescriber in the nursing home. (Details: http://www.hqontario.ca/Quality-Improvement/Practice-Reports/Primary-Care)
The Educational Outreach program will be delivered by academic detailers, health professionals (often nurses or pharmacists) who have received specific intensive training to support prescribing providers in a particular environment, in this case long-term care homes, to make the best or appropriate clinical decisions as possible. It is defined as: "an innovative method of service-oriented educational outreach for front-line clinicians. It combines the interactive, one-on-one communication approach of industry detailers with the evidence-based, non-commercial information of academia." The Educational Outreach will be delivered in addition to online Audit + Feedback practice reports, which detail prescribing performance for this class of medication for each prescriber in the nursing home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antipsychotic dispensing
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
Number of days with antipsychotic prescriptions in the last week (count, range 0 - 7)
6 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antipsychotic prescribing
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Any antipsychotic prescription during the past month (dichotomous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Mean Antipsychotic dose
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Dose equivalent of antipsychotic dispensed in the past month (continuous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Benzodiazepine (or sedative) prescribing
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Any prescription during the past month (dichotomous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Anti-depressant prescribing
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Any prescription during the past month (dichotomous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Acetaminophen prescribing
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Any prescription during the past month (dichotomous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Difficulty in performing activities
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Activities of Daily Living long form scale (continuous variable, range 0-28)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Aggressive behaviour scale
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Extent of aggressive behaviour (continuous variable, range 0-12)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Pain
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Pain scale (continuous variable, range 0-3)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Depression
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Depression rating scale (continuous variable, range 0-14)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Falls
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Number of falls in the past month (count)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Emergency Room visits
Time Frame: 3 months post-intervention
Number of ER visits during the previous 3 months (count)
3 months post-intervention
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 3 months post-intervention
Number of hospital visits visit during the previous 3 months (count)
3 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Noah Ivers, Family Doctor and Research Scientist

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MOHLTCAPDP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adverse Effect of Other Antipsychotics and Neuroleptics

Clinical Trials on Audit + Feedback

3
Subscribe