Role of glucagon, catecholamines, and growth hormone in human glucose counterregulation. Effects of somatostatin and combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade on plasma glucose recovery and glucose flux rates after insulin-induced hypoglycemia

R A Rizza, P E Cryer, J E Gerich, R A Rizza, P E Cryer, J E Gerich

Abstract

To further characterize mechanisms of glucose counterregulation in man, the effects of pharmacologically inducd deficiencies of glucagon, growth hormone, and catecholamines (alone and in combination) on recovery of plasma glucose from insulin-induced hypoglycemia and attendant changes in isotopically ([3-(3)H]glucose) determined glucose fluxes were studied in 13 normal subjects. In control studies, recovery of plasma glucose from hypoglycemia was primarily due to a compensatory increase in glucose production; the temporal relationship of glucagon, epinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone responses with the compensatory increase in glucose appearance was compatible with potential participation of all these hormones in acute glucose counterregulation. Infusion of somatostatin (combined deficiency of glucagon and growth hormone) accentuated insulin-induced hypoglycemia (plasma glucose nadir: 36+/-2 ng/dl during infusion of somatostatin vs. 47+/-2 mg/dl in control studies, P < 0.01) and impaired restoration of normoglycemia (plasma glucose at min 90: 73+/-3 mg/dl at end of somatostatin infusion vs. 92+/-3 mg/dl in control studies, P<0.01). This impaired recovery of plasma glucose was due to blunting of the compensatory increase in glucose appearance since glucose disappearance was not augmented, and was attributable to suppression of glucagon secretion rather than growth hormone secretion since these effects of somatostatin were not observed during simultaneous infusion of somatostatin and glucagon whereas infusion of growth hormone along with somatostatin did not prevent the effect of somatostatin. The attenuated recovery of plasma glucose from hypoglycemia observed during somatostatin-induced glucagon deficiency was associated with plasma epinephrine levels twice those observed in control studies. Infusion of phentolamine plus propranolol (combined alpha-and beta-adrenergic blockade) had no effect on plasma glucose or glucose fluxes after insulin administration. However, infusion of somatostatin along with both phentolamine and propranolol further impaired recovery of plasma glucose from hypoglycemia compared to that observed with somatostatin alone (plasma glucose at end of infusions: 52+/-6 mg/dl for somatostatin-phentolamine-propranolol vs. 72+/-5 mg/dl for somatostatin alone, P < 0.01); this was due to further suppression of the compensatory increase in glucose appearance (maximal values: 1.93+/-0.41 mg/kg per min for somatostatin-phentolamine-propranolol vs. 2.86+/-0.32 mg/kg per min for somatostatin alone, P < 0.05). These results indicate that in man (a) restoration of normoglycemia after insulin-induced hypoglycemia is primarily due to a compensatory increase in glucose production; (b) intact glucagon secretion, but not growth hormone secretion, is necessary for normal glucose counterregulation, and (c) adrenergic mechanisms do not normally play an essential role in this process but become critical to recovery from hypoglycemia when glucagon secretion is impaired.

References

    1. Eur J Clin Invest. 1975 Sep 12;5(5):415-23
    1. Diabetes. 1976 Jan;25(1):65-71
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(5):471-4
    1. Am J Physiol. 1975 Jun;228(6):1787-93
    1. Horm Metab Res. 1975 Sep;7(5):378-81
    1. Metabolism. 1975 Nov;24(11):1267-72
    1. J Clin Invest. 1976 Feb;57(2):522-5
    1. Am J Physiol. 1976 Apr;230(4):1090-4
    1. Lancet. 1956 Sep 8;271(6941):491-4
    1. Am J Physiol. 1957 Apr;189(1):43-50
    1. Science. 1963 May 31;140(3570):987-8
    1. J Clin Invest. 1964 Feb;43:237-46
    1. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1963;19:445-88
    1. Metabolism. 1976 Jun;25(6):659-63
    1. Annu Rev Biochem. 1976;45:167-89
    1. Endocrinology. 1978 Oct;103(4):1054-66
    1. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1978 Mar;87(3):659-67
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1978 May;46(5):778-83
    1. J Clin Invest. 1974 Nov;54(5):1214-20
    1. Lancet. 1966 Dec 24;2(7478):1386-8
    1. Am J Physiol. 1979 Feb;236(2):E147-52
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1966 May;19(3):284-92
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1967 Jul;27(7):973-90
    1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Oct;126(1):232-6
    1. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1970;26:411-61
    1. J Biol Chem. 1971 Oct 25;246(20):6166-77
    1. Am J Physiol. 1979 Apr;236(4):E380-5
    1. Am J Med. 1972 Nov;53(5):573-89
    1. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1969 Apr;178(2):412-22
    1. Diabetes. 1974 Sep;23(9):725-31
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974 Dec;39(6):1025-9
    1. Metabolism. 1973 Sep;22(9):1235-51
    1. Physiol Rev. 1974 Jul;54(3):596-619
    1. Diabetes. 1973 Jan;22(1):1-8
    1. J Clin Invest. 1973 Aug;52(8):1841-4
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974 Jan;38(1):77-82
    1. Diabetes. 1974 Mar;23(3):199-202
    1. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;236(3):611-23
    1. Fed Proc. 1974 Jul;33(7):1855-64
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1970 Dec;31(6):647-53
    1. J Physiol. 1972 Jun;223(2):571-93
    1. J Clin Invest. 1971 Feb;50(2):411-21
    1. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1967 Dec;56(4):593-607
    1. J Clin Invest. 1966 Apr;45(4):429-36
    1. J Clin Invest. 1976 Jul;58(1):7-15
    1. Metabolism. 1976 Feb;25(2):227-32
    1. J Clin Invest. 1975 Apr;55(4):754-62
    1. Life Sci. 1977 Feb 15;20(4):733-5

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe