An evidence-based programme for smoking cessation: effectiveness in routine general practice

G Grandes, J M Cortada, A Arrazola, G Grandes, J M Cortada, A Arrazola

Abstract

Background: Smoking cessation clinical practice guidelines are based on randomised clinical trials reporting outcomes in persons who participate in these studies. However, many practitioners are sceptical about the effectiveness of these recommendations when applied to the general population in everyday routine consultation.

Aim: To evaluate the results of a comprehensive smoking cessation programme in routine primary care practice.

Method: All smokers consulting in 10 general practices during one year participated in a non-randomised controlled trial. The percentages of subjects in the intervention (n = 1203, seven practices) and control (n = 565, three practices) groups who reported sustained abstinence between six and 12 months follow-up and were validated biochemically were compared. The effect of the programme was adjusted to baseline differences in both groups by multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results: The programme resulted in an increase of five percentage points (95% CI = 3.1%-6.8%) in the validated and sustained one-year abstinence probability, with 7.1% for all of the intervention practices (adjusted OR = 3.7, 95% CI = 2.4-5.7).

Conclusion: Programmes that combine advice to stop smoking to all smokers attending general practices with the offering of support, follow-up, and nicotine patches to those willing to stop are feasible and effective in routine practice, as primary care clinicians need only identify 20 smokers to get one additional success attributable to the programme.

References

    1. Br Med J. 1979 Jul 28;2(6184):231-5
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Dec 10;287(6407):1782-5
    1. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119-27
    1. Clin Chest Med. 1991 Dec;12(4):727-35
    1. JAMA. 1994 Feb 23;271(8):589-94
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug 1;140(3):279-89; discussion 300-1
    1. Addiction. 1995 Jan;90(1):31-42
    1. JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1247-51
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):145-8
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):87-91
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jun 23;157(12):1313-9
    1. Med Clin (Barc). 1997 Nov 1;109(15):577-82
    1. BMJ. 1998 Jan 24;316(7127):285
    1. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Jan;14(1):1-8
    1. Thorax. 1998 Dec;53 Suppl 5 Pt 1:S1-19

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe