Treosulfan-fludarabine-thiotepa-based conditioning treatment before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with hematological malignancies

Krzysztof Kalwak, Monika Mielcarek, Katharine Patrick, Jan Styczynski, Peter Bader, Selim Corbacioglu, Birgit Burkhardt, Karl Walter Sykora, Katarzyna Drabko, Jolanta Gozdzik, Franca Fagioli, Johann Greil, Bernd Gruhn, Rita Beier, Franco Locatelli, Ingo Müller, Paul Gerhardt Schlegel, Petr Sedlacek, Klaus Daniel Stachel, Claudia Hemmelmann, Ann-Kristin Möller, Joachim Baumgart, Ajay Vora, Krzysztof Kalwak, Monika Mielcarek, Katharine Patrick, Jan Styczynski, Peter Bader, Selim Corbacioglu, Birgit Burkhardt, Karl Walter Sykora, Katarzyna Drabko, Jolanta Gozdzik, Franca Fagioli, Johann Greil, Bernd Gruhn, Rita Beier, Franco Locatelli, Ingo Müller, Paul Gerhardt Schlegel, Petr Sedlacek, Klaus Daniel Stachel, Claudia Hemmelmann, Ann-Kristin Möller, Joachim Baumgart, Ajay Vora

Abstract

Treosulfan-based conditioning prior to allogeneic transplantation has been shown to have myeloablative, immunosuppressive, and antineoplastic effects associated with reduced non-relapse mortality (NRM) in adults. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of treosulfan-based conditioning in children with hematological malignancies in this phase II trial. Overall, 65 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (35.4%), acute myeloid leukemia (44.6%), myelodysplastic syndrome (15.4%), or juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (4.6%) received treosulfan intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/m2/day (7.7%), 12 g/m2/day (35.4%), or 14 g/m2/day (56.9%) according to their individual body surface area in combination with fludarabine and thiotepa. The incidence of complete donor chimerism at day +28 was 98.4% with no primary and only one secondary graft failure. At 36 months, NRM was only 3.1%, while relapse incidence was 21.7%, and overall survival was 83.0%. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-vs.-host disease was 45.3% for grades I-IV and 26.6% for grades II-IV. At 36 months, 25.8% overall and 19.4% moderate/severe chronic graft-vs.-host disease were reported. These data confirm the safe and effective use of treosulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies. Therefore, treosulfan/fludarabine/thiotepa can be recommended for myeloablative conditioning in children with hematological malignancies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02333058.

Conflict of interest statement

KK has received research funding from medac GmbH, Sanofi, and other travel grants. PB has received research funding and patents and royalties from medac GmbH, research funding from Riemser and Neovii. He also received compensation from Cellgene and Novartis for his consultations. In addition, he received compensation from Novartis for Speakers Bureau. BG received honoraria from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. KP received funding from medac GmbH and other funding for EBMT conference fees and accommodation. Prof. KW S received research funding and travel grants from medac GmbH and Aventis-Behring. SC received honoraria for his consultations from Gentium and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. RB received travel grants from medac GmbH and Neovii and is on Bluebird Bio’s advisory board. FL received funding for EBMT/ASH conference fees and accommodation as well as speakers bureau from medac GmbH. AV is on the advisory board for Pfizer, medac GmbH, Novartis, Amgen, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals and also received other funding from them. CH, AKM, and JB are employees of medac GmbH. JB has licensed an employee’s invention (PCT/EP00/10871) to medac GmbH.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treosulfan dose-dependent cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (a), relapse/progression (b), Kaplan–Meier estimate of relapse/progression-free survival (c) and of overall survival (d).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for relapse/progression-free survival displaying 36 months rates by subgroups.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier estimates of (a) GvHD-free and relapse/progression-free survival and (b) chronic GvHD-free and relapse/progression-free survival.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan–Meier estimate of overall survival.

References

    1. Niemeyer CM, Kratz CP. Paediatric myelodysplastic syndromes and juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia: molecular classification and treatment options. Br J Haematol. 2008;140:610–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06958.x..
    1. Peters C, Schrappe M, Stackelberg A, von Schrauder A, Bader P, Ebell W, et al. Stem-cell transplantation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a prospective international multicenter trial comparing sibling donors with matched unrelated donors-The ALL-SCT-BFM-2003 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1265–74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9747..
    1. Beier R, Albert MH, Bader P, Borkhardt A, Creutzig U, Eyrich M, et al. Allo-SCT using BU, CY and melphalan for children with AML in second CR. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:651–6. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.204..
    1. Balduzzi A, Valsecchi MG, Silvestri D, Locatelli F, Manfredini L, Busca A, et al. Transplant-related toxicity and mortality: an AIEOP prospective study in 636 pediatric patients transplanted for acute leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;29:93–100. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703337..
    1. Bresters D, van Gils ICM, Kollen WJW, Ball LM, Oostdijk W, van der Bom JG, et al. High burden of late effects after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in childhood: a single-centre study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:79–85. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.92..
    1. Shimoni A, Labopin M, Savani B, Hamladji R-M, Beelen D, Mufti G, et al. Intravenous busulfan compared with treosulfan-based conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: a study on behalf of the acute leukemia working party of european society for blood and marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24:751–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.776..
    1. Nagler A, Labopin M, Beelen D, Ciceri F, Volin L, Shimoni A, et al. Long-term outcome after a treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Cancer. 2017;123:2671–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30646..
    1. Ruutu T, Volin L, Beelen DW, Trenschel R, Finke J, Schnitzler M, et al. Reduced-toxicity conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: final results of an international prospective phase II trial. Haematologica. 2011;96:1344–50. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043810..
    1. Kröger N, Bornhäuser M, Stelljes M, Pichlmeier U, Trenschel R, Schmid C, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after conditioning with treosulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide for patients with ALL: a phase II-study on behalf of the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group and ALL Study Group (GMALL) Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50:1503–7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.202..
    1. Casper J, Knauf W, Kiefer T, Wolff D, Steiner B, Hammer U, et al. Treosulfan and fludarabine: a new toxicity-reduced conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2004;103:725–31. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3615..
    1. Beelen DW, Trenschel R, Stelljes M, Groth C, Masszi T, Reményi P, et al. Treosulfan or busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning treatment before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MC-FludT.14/L): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019:e28–39. 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30157-7.
    1. Slatter MA, Rao K, Abd Hamid IJ, Nademi Z, Chiesa R, Elfeky R, et al. Treosulfan and fludarabine conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with primary immunodeficiency: UK experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24:529–36. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.11.009..
    1. Burroughs LM, Shimamura A, Talano J-A, Domm JA, Baker KK, Delaney C, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using treosulfan-based conditioning for treatment of marrow failure disorders. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23:1669–77. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.06.002..
    1. Marzollo A, Calore E, Tumino M, Pillon M, Gazzola MV, Destro R, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimen in sibling and alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with sickle cell disease. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2017;9:e2017014. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2017.014..
    1. Morillo-Gutierrez B, Beier R, Rao K, Burroughs L, Schulz A, Ewins A-M, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning for allogeneic HSCT in children with chronic granulomatous disease: a multicenter experience. Blood. 2016;128:440–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-704015..
    1. Slatter MA, Boztug H, Pötschger U, Sykora K-W, Lankester A, Yaniv I, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with non-malignant diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50:1536–41. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.171..
    1. Strocchio L, Zecca M, Comoli P, Mina T, Giorgiani G, Giraldi E, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol. 2015;169:726–36. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13352..
    1. Dinur-Schejter Y, Krauss AC, Erlich O, Gorelik N, Yahel A, Porat I, et al. Bone marrow transplantation for non-malignant diseases using treosulfan-based conditioning. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62:299–304. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25267..
    1. Maschan M, Shelikhova L, Ilushina M, Kurnikova E, Boyakova E, Balashov D, et al. TCR-alpha/beta and CD19 depletion and treosulfan-based conditioning regimen in unrelated and haploidentical transplantation in children with acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:668–74. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.343..
    1. Boztug H, Sykora K-W, Slatter M, Zecca M, Veys P, Lankester A, et al. European Society for blood and marrow transplantation analysis of treosulfan conditioning before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents with hematological malignancies. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:139–48. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25764..
    1. Bernardo ME, Piras E, Vacca A, Giorgiani G, Zecca M, Bertaina A, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia major: results of a reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen based on the use of treosulfan. Blood. 2012;120:473–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-423822..
    1. van der Stoep MYEC, Bertaina A, Brink MHten, Bredius RG, Smiers FJ, Wanders DCM, et al. High interpatient variability of treosulfan exposure is associated with early toxicity in paediatric HSCT: a prospective multicentre study. Br J Haematol. 2017;179:772–80. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14960..
    1. Romański M, Wachowiak J, Główka FK. Treosulfan pharmacokinetics and its variability in pediatric and adult patients undergoing conditioning prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: current state of the art, in-depth analysis, and perspectives. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57:1255–65. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0647-4..
    1. Chiesa R, Standing JF, Winter R, Nademi Z, Chu J, Pinner D, et al. Proposed therapeutic range of treosulfan in reduced toxicity pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning: results from a prospective trial. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019. 10.1002/cpt.1715.
    1. van der Stoep MYEC, Zwaveling J, Bertaina A, Locatelli F, Guchelaar HJ, Lankester AC, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of treosulfan in paediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Clin Pharm. 2019;85:2033–44. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13995..
    1. Reijmers T, Hemmelmann C, Sykora K-W, Vora A, Kehne J, Möller A-K, et al. Population PK-modelling of treosulfan in paediatric allogeneic transplant patients. Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe (page), Montreux; 2018.
    1. McCurdy SR, Kasamon YL, Kanakry CG, Bolaños-Meade J, Tsai H-L, Showel MM, et al. Comparable composite endpoints after HLA-matched and HLA-haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Haematologica. 2017;102:391–400. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.144139..
    1. Jones RJ, Lee KS, Beschorner WE, Vogel VG, Grochow LB, Braine HG, et al. Venoocclusive disease of the liver following bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation. 1987;44:778–83. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198712000-00011.
    1. Bearman SI, Appelbaum FR, Buckner CD, Petersen FB, Fisher LD, Clift RA, et al. Regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:1562–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.10.1562..
    1. Maiolica A, Meunier L, Bialleck S, Guhde I, Wood S, Struwe P. Bioanalytical determination of treosulfan and its active metabolites. EBF 7th Open Meeting, Barcilona; 2014.
    1. Nemecek ER, Hilger RA, Adams A, Shaw BE, Kiefer D, Le-Rademacher J, et al. Treosulfan, fludarabine, and low-dose total body irradiation for children and young adults with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: prospective phase II trial of the pediatric blood and marrow transplant consortium. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24:1651–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.04.025..
    1. Locatelli F, Nöllke P, Zecca M, Korthof E, Lanino E, Peters C, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML): results of the EWOG-MDS/EBMT trial. Blood. 2005;105:410–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-1944..
    1. Lucchini G, Labopin M, Beohou E, Dalissier A, Dalle JH, Cornish J, et al. Impact of conditioning regimen on outcomes for children with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing transplantation in first complete remission. An analysis on behalf of the pediatric disease working party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23:467–74. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.11.022..
    1. Strahm B, Nöllke P, Zecca M, Korthof ET, Bierings M, Furlan I, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome in children: results of the EWOG-MDS 98 study. Leukemia. 2011;25:455–62. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.297..
    1. Bartelink IH, van Reij EML, Gerhardt CE, van Maarseveen EM, Wildt A, de, Versluys B, et al. Fludarabine and exposure-targeted busulfan compares favorably with busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimens in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: maintaining efficacy with less toxicity. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:345–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.11.027..
    1. European Medicines Agency. Union register of medicinal products: marketing authorisation. Decision number (2019)4858 of 20 Jun 2019. 2019. .

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe