Low intra-abdominal pressure and deep neuromuscular blockade laparoscopic surgery and surgical space conditions: A meta-analysis

Yiyong Wei, Jia Li, Fude Sun, Donghang Zhang, Ming Li, Yunxia Zuo, Yiyong Wei, Jia Li, Fude Sun, Donghang Zhang, Ming Li, Yunxia Zuo

Abstract

Background: Low intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) are frequently used in laparoscopic abdominal surgery to improve surgical space conditions and decrease postoperative pain. The evidence supporting operations using low IAP and deep NMB is open to debate.

Methods: The feasibility of the routine use of low IAP +deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery was examined. A meta-analysis is conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the influence of low IAP + deep NMB vs. low IAP + moderate NMB, standard IAP +deep NMB, and standard IAP + moderate NMB during laparoscopic procedures on surgical space conditions, the duration of surgery and postoperative pain. RCTs were identified using the Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from initiation to June 2019. Our search identified 9 eligible studies on the use of low IAP + deep NMB and surgical space conditions.

Results: Low IAP + deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery did not improve the surgical space conditions when compared with the use of moderate NMB, with a mean difference (MD) of -0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.55-0.37). Subgroup analyses showed improved surgical space conditions with the use of low IAP + deep NMB compared with low IAP + moderate NMB, (MD = 0.63 [95% CI:0.06-1.19]), and slightly worse conditions compared with the use of standard IAP + deep NMB and standard IAP + moderate NMB, with MDs of -1.13(95% CI:-1.47 to 0.79) and -0.87(95% CI:-1.30 to 0.43), respectively. The duration of surgery did not improve with low IAP + deep NMB, (MD = 1.72 [95% CI: -1.69 to 5.14]), and no significant reduction in early postoperative pain was found in the deep-NMB group (MD = -0.14 [95% CI: -0.51 to 0.23]).

Conclusion: Low IAP +deep NMB is not significantly more effective than other IAP +NMB combinations for optimizing surgical space conditions, duration of surgery, or postoperative pain in this meta-analysis. Whether the use of low IAP + deep NMB results in fewer intraoperative complications, enhanced quality of recovery or both after laparoscopic surgery should be studied in the future.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of select studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Assessment of risk of bias.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Surgical space conditions were not improved by the use of low IAP + deep NMB. Forest plots of the studies comparing surgical space conditions during laparoscopic procedures using low IAP + deep NMB vs low IAP + moderate NMB, standard IAP + deep NMB, or standard IAP + moderate NMB. The effect size was calculated as the mean difference in the surgical rating scale (range = 1–5) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Subgroup meta-analysis of the surgical space conditions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The duration of surgery is not significantly decreased by the use of low IAP + deep NMB. Forest plot of studies comparing the duration of surgery during laparoscopic procedures with low IAP + deep NMB vs low IAP + moderate NMB, standard IAP +deep NMB, or standard IAP +moderate NMB. The effect size is calculated as the mean difference in duration of surgery in minutes and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Postoperative pain in the post-anesthesia care unit was not reduced by the use of low IAP + deep NMB. A forest plot of the studies comparing postoperative pain 1 h after the laparoscopic procedures using low IAP + deep NMB vs low IAP + moderate NMB, standard IAP + deep NMB or standard IAP + moderate NMB. The effect size was calculated as the mean difference on the numerical rating scale (range = 0–10) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

References

    1. JN, SS, E N, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Sur Endosc 2002;16:1121–43.
    1. KS G, JV, BR D. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;3:1–6.
    1. WJ B, ML, IH BR, et al. Peritoneal changes due to laparoscopic surgery. Sur Endosc 2011;25:1–9.
    1. LM, JK, JT, et al. Moderate intra-abdominal hypertension is associated with an increased lactate-pyruvate ratio in the rectus abdominis muscle tissue: a pilot study during laparoscopic surgery. Ann Inten Care 2012;2:1–6.
    1. ML M, DV, AK, et al. Relationship between intra-abdominal pressure and indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate: hepatic perfusion may be impaired in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Ann Intens Care 2012;2:2–11.
    1. LA S, TW S, CL, et al. Moderate increase in intraabdominal pressure attenuates gastric mucosal oxygen saturation in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology 2004;100:1081–7.
    1. MV M, OI, AK S-R, et al. Postoperative shoulder pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy with deep neuromuscular blockade and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum: A randomised controlled trial. Euro J Anaesthesiol 2016;33:341–7.
    1. EB K, S M-L, AB, et al. Low vs standard pressures in gynecologic laparoscopy: a systematic review. JSLS 2016;20:1–7.
    1. LD P, DL D, AC B, et al. General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Col Surg 2010;210:60–5.
    1. HC, BP C, IM S, et al. Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review. Sur Infect 2017;18:722–35.
    1. JB, CL E, G SM, et al. Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2016;34:197–203.
    1. MV M, AK S-R, MR G, et al. Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesth Scandinavica 2015;59:1–6.
    1. MH B, EV vH, AE B, et al. Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2017;118:834–42.
    1. AK S-R, LS R, JR, et al. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analgesia 2014;119:1084–92.
    1. MH K, KY L, KY L, et al. Maintaining optimal surgical conditions with low insufflation pressures is possible with deep neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Medicine 2016;95:1–7.
    1. BW K, AY O, KS S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of moderate versus deep neuromuscular block for low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2016;40:2898–903.
    1. MK, NS, DR D, et al. Requirements for muscle relaxants during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1392–7.
    1. GS M, JW S, JH M, et al. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analgesia 2008;107:130–7.
    1. SJ B, AF K. Current status of neuromuscular reversal and monitoring: challenges and opportunities. Anesthesiology 2017;126:173–90.
    1. Yoo YC, Kim NY, Shin S, et al. The intraocular pressure under deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade during low-pressure robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a randomized trial. PLoS One 2015;10:1–4.
    1. Cho YJ, Paik H, Jeong SY, et al. Lower intra-abdominal pressure has no cardiopulmonary benefits during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Sur Endosc 2018;11:4533–42.
    1. Ozdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Scheffer GJ, van der Jagt M, et al. Quality of recovery after low-pressure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy facilitated by deep neuromuscular blockade: a randomized controlled study. World J Surg 2017;41:2950–8.
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:1–9.
    1. Koo BW, Oh AY, Seo KS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of moderate versus deep neuromuscular block for low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2016;40:2898–903.
    1. Rosenberg J, Herring WJ, Blobner M, et al. Deep neuromuscular blockade improves laparoscopic surgical conditions: a randomized, controlled study. Adv Therapy 2017;34:925–36.
    1. Ozdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Braat AE, van der Jagt MFP, et al. Deep neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions during low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2017;32:245–51.
    1. Barrio J, Errando CL, García-Ramón J, et al. Influence of depth of neuromuscular blockade on surgical conditions during low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized blinded study. J Clin Anesth 2017;42:26–30.
    1. Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, et al. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg 2014;119:1084–92.
    1. Madsen MV, Istre O, Staehr-Rye AK, et al. Postoperative shoulder pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy with deep neuromuscular blockade and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016;33:341–7.
    1. NT N, JT A, MB, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2004;18:64–71.
    1. JR, WJ H, MB, et al. Deep neuromuscular blockade improves laparoscopic surgical conditions: a randomized, controlled study. Adv Therapy 2017;34:925–36.
    1. Bruintjes MH, Van Helden EV, Braat AE, et al. Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2017;118:834–42.
    1. MV M, MR G, HH S, et al. Optimising abdominal space with deep neuromuscular blockade in gynaecologic laparoscopy--a randomised, blinded crossover study. Acta Anaesth Scandinavica 2015;59:441–7.
    1. Ö-vB DM, vL KC, GJ S, et al. What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum: A systematic review. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2049–65.
    1. CH M, MB, RF B, et al. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 2014;112:498–505.
    1. PE D, LP, JJ, et al. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014;31:430–6.
    1. AF K, MN Is deep neuromuscular block beneficial in laparoscopic surgery? No, probably not. Acta Anaesth Scandinavica 2016;60:717–22.
    1. MV M, AK S-R, CC, et al. Is deep neuromuscular blockade beneficial in laparoscopic surgery? Yes, probably. Acta Anaesth Scandinavica 2016;60:710–6.
    1. YJ C, H P, SY J, et al. Lower intra-abdominal pressure has no cardiopulmonary benefits during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2018;32:4533–42.
    1. DMD Ö-vB, GJ S, M vdJ, et al. Quality of recovery after low-pressure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy facilitated by deep neuromuscular blockade: a randomized controlled study. World J Surg 2017;41:2950–8.
    1. N V, SC S, PK, et al. Comparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Techniques 2014;24:127–33.
    1. EP, AV, GV, et al. Randomized comparison between different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Techniques 2003;13:245–9.
    1. ES, MM, CK, et al. Cerebral carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analgesia 1995;81:643–5.
    1. JO, CA J, WS, et al. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg Endosc 2001;15:600–8.
    1. SA K, HA K, AR N, et al. Effect of epidural analgesia on bowel function in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sur Endosc 2013;27:2581–91.
    1. BM U, HT, WS, et al. Intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events. Sur Endosc 1994;8:90–6.
    1. TB, BK, VB K, et al. Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analgesia 1999;89:1017–24.
    1. JJ, ET, PP, et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analgesia 1995;81:379–84.
    1. AM D, FB, IG, et al. Surgical techniques to minimize shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review. Sur Endosc 2013;27:2275–82.
    1. AF K, MN Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful? Anesth Analgesia 2015;120:51–8.
    1. BT, CH M, MB, et al. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during bariatric surgery and reduces postoperative pain: a randomized double blind controlled trial. PloS one 2016;11:1–4.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe