The effect of music in gynaecological office procedures on pain, anxiety and satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial

N Mak, I M A Reinders, S A Slockers, E H M N Westen, J W M Maas, M Y Bongers, N Mak, I M A Reinders, S A Slockers, E H M N Westen, J W M Maas, M Y Bongers

Abstract

Background: Pain can interfere with office procedures in gynaecology. The aim of this study is to measure the positive effect of music in gynaecological office procedures.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was performed between October 2014 and January 2016. Women scheduled for an office hysteroscopy or colposcopy were eligible for randomization in the music group or control group. Stratification for hysteroscopy and colposcopy took place. The primary outcome is patients' level of pain during the procedure measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include patients' level of pain after the procedure, anxiety and satisfaction of patient and doctor.

Results: No positive effect of music on patients' perception of pain during the procedure was measured, neither for the hysteroscopy group (57 mm vs. 52 mm) nor for the colposcopy group (32 mm vs. 32 mm). Secondary outcomes were also similar for both groups.

Conclusions: This study showed no positive effect of music on patients' level of pain, anxiety or satisfaction of patient or doctor for office hysteroscopy and colposcopy. We believe a multimodal approach has to be used to decrease patient distress in terms of pain and anxiety, with or without music.

Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register, NTR4924.

Keywords: Anxiety; Colposcopy; Hysteroscopy; Music; Office procedures; Pain.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the hospital (Study number 2014–28). The committee determined that this study did not belong to the scope of the medical research involving human subjects act.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hysteroscopy: flow chart patient inclusion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Colposcopy: flow chart patient inclusion

References

    1. Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L. Office hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2004;31:641–654. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2004.05.007.
    1. Nagele F, OÇonnor H, Davies A, et al (1996) 2500 Outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies. Obstet Gynecol 88(1):87–92
    1. Gajjar K, Martin-Hirsch PPL, Bryant A, Owens GL (2016) Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18;7:CD006120.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006120
    1. Marteau TM, Walker P, Giles J, et al. Anxieties in women undergoing colposcopy. BJOG. 1990;97:859–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02586.x.
    1. Gambadauro P, Navaratnarajah R, Carli V. Anxiety at outpatient hysteroscopy. Gynec Surg. 2015;12(3):189–196. doi: 10.1007/s10397-015-0895-3.
    1. Ahmad G, O’Flynn H, Attarbashi S, et al (2010) Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10;(11):CD007710. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007710
    1. Galaal K, Bryant A, Deane KHO et al (2011) Interventions for reducing anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7(12):CD006013. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006013
    1. De Carvalho Schettini JA, Ramos de Amorim MM, Ribeiro Costa AA, Albuquerque Neto LC, et al. Pain evaluation in outpatients undergoing diagnostic anesthesia-free hysteroscopy in a teaching hospital: a cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(6):729–735. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.05.009.
    1. Cepeda MS, Carr DB, Lau J, Alvarez H (2006) Music for pain relief. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19;(2):CD004843
    1. Wang MW, Zhang LY, Zhang YL, et al (2014) Effect of music in endoscopy procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Med 15(10):1786–1794. doi:10.1111/pme.12514
    1. Danhauer SC, Marler B, Rutherford CA et al (2007) Music or guided imagery for women undergoing colposcopy: a randomized controlled study of effects on anxiety, perceived pain, and patient satisfaction. J Low Genit Tract Dis 11(1):39–45
    1. Chan YM, Lee PW, NG TY, et al (2003) The use of music to reduce anxiety for patients undergoing colposcopy: a randomised trial. Gynecol Oncol 91(1):213–217
    1. Angioli R, De Cicco Nardone C, Plotti F, et al. (2014) Use of music to reduce anxiety during office hysteroscopy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(3):454–459. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.020
    1. Pluyter JR, Buzink SN, Rutkowski AF, Jakimowics JJ. Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure? Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):902–907. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0689-7.
    1. Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, et al (2013) Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 216(5):933–938. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.048
    1. Walsh JC, Curtis R, Mylotte M. Anxiety levels in women attending a colposcopy clinic: a randomised trial of an educational intervention using video colposcopy. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55(2):247–251. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.012.
    1. Campo R, Molinas CR, Rombouts L, et al. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(1):258–263. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh559.
    1. Tam WH, Yuen PM. Use of diclofenac as an analgesic in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(5):1070–1072. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02832-1.
    1. Ireland LD, Allen RH (2016) Pain management for gynecologic procedures in the office. Obstet Gynecol Surv 71(2):89–98. doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000272
    1. Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, et al. What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain. 2003;105(1–2):151–157. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00176-3.
    1. Litta P, Cosmi E, Saccardi C et al (2008) Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia: advantages and limits. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139(2):210–214. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.11.008

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe