Treatment simplification in HIV-infected adults as a strategy to prevent toxicity, improve adherence, quality of life and decrease healthcare costs

Jean B Nachega, Michael J Mugavero, Michele Zeier, Marco Vitória, Joel E Gallant, Jean B Nachega, Michael J Mugavero, Michele Zeier, Marco Vitória, Joel E Gallant

Abstract

Since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has become more potent and better tolerated. While the current treatment regimens still have limitations, they are more effective, more convenient, and less toxic than regimens used in the early HAART era, and new agents, formulations and strategies continue to be developed. Simplification of therapy is an option for many patients currently being treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART). The main goals are to reduce pill burden, improve quality of life and enhance medication adherence, while minimizing short- and long-term toxicities, reducing the risk of virologic failure and maximizing cost-effectiveness. ART simplification strategies that are currently used or are under study include the use of once-daily regimens, less toxic drugs, fixed-dose coformulations and induction-maintenance approaches. Improved adherence and persistence have been observed with the adoption of some of these strategies. The role of regimen simplification has implications not only for individual patients, but also for health care policy. With increased interest in ART regimen simplification, it is critical to study not only implications for individual tolerability, toxicity, adherence, persistence and virologic efficacy, but also cost, scalability, and potential for dissemination and implementation, such that limited human and financial resources are optimally allocated for maximal efficiency, coverage and sustainability of global HIV/AIDS treatment.

Keywords: ART; adherence; coformulations; healthcare cost; once-daily; persistence; quality of life; simplification.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
1996 to 2011, from multiple drugs to once-daily and more potent antiretroviral therapy regimens: the long road to patient satisfaction and adherence.

References

    1. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents . Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services; Jan 10, 2011. pp. 1–166. Available from: . Accessed 2011 Feb 14.
    1. McKinnon JE, Mellors JW, Swindells S. Simplification strategies to reduce antiretroviral drug exposure: progress and prospects. Antivir Ther. 2009;14(1):1–12.
    1. World Health Organization Antiretroviral Therapy For HIV Infection Adults And Adolescents: Recommendations for a public health approach. 2010 revision. Available from: .
    1. Henry K, Brundage R, Weller D, Akinsete O, Shet A. Comparison of generic zidovudine plus lamivudine (Cipla, Duovir) and the GlaxoSmithKline brand (Combivir) tablets. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(5):537.
    1. Vezina H, Henry K, Ravindran GD, et al. A randomized crossover study to determine bioequivalence of generic and brand name nevirapine, zidovudine, and lamivudine in HIV-negative women in India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41(2):131–136.
    1. Parienti JJ, Bangsberg DR, Verdon R, Gardner EM. Better adherence with once-daily antiretroviral regimens: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(4):484–488.
    1. Maitland D, Jackson A, Osorio J, et al. Switch Study Team Switching from twice-daily abacavir and lamivudine to the once-daily fixed-dose combination tablet of abacavir and lamivudine improves patient adherence and satisfaction with therapy. HIV Med. 2008;9(8):667–672.
    1. Wright D, Rodriguez A, Godofsky E, et al. Efficacy and safety of 48 weeks of enfuvirtide 180 mg once-daily dosing versus 90 mg twice-daily dosing in HIV-infected patients. HIV Clin Trials. 2008;9(2):73–82.
    1. Boyle BA, Jayaweera D, Witt MD, et al. Randomization to once-daily stavudine extended release/lamivudine/efavirenz versus a more frequent regimen improves adherence while maintaining viral suppression. HIV Clin Trials. 2008;9(3):164–176.
    1. Zajdenverg R, Badal-Faesen, Andrade-Villanueva J, et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) tablets administered once-(QD) or twice-daily (BID) with NRTIs in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-1 Infected subjects: results of a 48-week randomized trial (Study M06-802). 5th IAS Conference on HIV pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention; Cape Town, South Africa. 2009 Jul 19–22; Available from: .
    1. Bangsberg DR, Ragland K, Monk A, et al. A single tablet regimen is associated with higher adherence and viral suppression than multiple tablet regimens in HIV+ homeless and marginally housed people. AIDS. 2010;24(18):2835–2840.
    1. DeJesus E, Pozniak A, Gallant J, et al. Improvement in Fasting Lipids but Minimal Recovery of Limb Fat Were Seen 96 Weeks After Switching from Lamivudine/Zidovudine Plus Efavirenz to Fixed-Dose Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in HIV-Infected Patients. 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC); September 12–15, 2009; San Francisco, CA USA. Poster# H-1572. Available from: . Accessed July 10, 2011.
    1. Airoldi M, Zaccarelli M, Bisi L, et al. One-pill once-a-day HAART: a simplification strategy that improves adherence and quality of life of HIV-infected subjects. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010;4:115–125.
    1. Bae JW, Guyer W, Grimm K, Altice FL. Medication persistence in the treatment of HIV infection: a review of the literature and implications for future clinical care and research. AIDS. 2011;25(3):279–290.
    1. Willig JH, Abroms S, Westfall AO, et al. Increased regimen durability in the era of once-daily fixed-dose combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2008;22(15):1951–1960.
    1. Gardner EM, Burman WJ, Maravi ME, Davidson AJ. Selective drug taking during combination antiretroviral therapy in an unselected clinic population. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40(3):294–300.
    1. Vo TT, Ledergerber B, Keiser O, et al. Durability and outcome of initial antiretroviral treatments received during 2000–2005 by patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(12):1685–1694.
    1. Dybul M, Chun TW, Yoder C, et al. Short-cycle structured intermittent treatment of chronic HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy: effects on virologic, immunologic, and toxicity parameters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(26):15161–15166.
    1. Dybul M, Nies-Kraske E, Dewar R, et al. A proof-of-concept study of short-cycle intermittent antiretroviral therapy with a once-daily regimen of didanosine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for the treatment of chronic HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(11):1974–1982.
    1. Cohen CJ, Colson AE, Sheble-Hall AG, McLaughlin KA, Morse GD. Pilot study of a novel short-cycle antiretroviral treatment interruption strategy: 48-week results of the five-days-on, two-days-off (FOTO) study. HIV Clin Trials. 2007;8(1):19–23.
    1. Cohen C, Colson A, Pierone G, et al. 5th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention; Cape Town, South Africa. 2009 Jul 19–22; The FOTO study: the 48 week extension to assess durability of the strategy of taking efavirenz, tenofovir and emtricitabine Five days On, Two days Off (FOTO) each week in virologically suppressed patients, Ab#MOPEB063. Available from .
    1. Danel C, Moh R, Minga A, et al. Trivacan ANRS 1269 trial group CD4-guided structured antiretroviral treatment interruption strategy in HIV-infected adults in west Africa (Trivacan ANRS 1269 trial): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9527):1981–1989.
    1. Ananworanich J, Gayet-Ageron A, Le Braz M, et al. Staccato Study Group Swiss HIV Cohort Study. CD4-guided scheduled treatment interruptions compared with continuous therapy for patients infected with HIV-1: results of the Staccato randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9534):459–465.
    1. El-Sadr WM, Lundgren JD, Neaton JD, et al. Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group. CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(22):2283–2296.
    1. El-Sadr WM, Grund B, Neuhaus J, et al. Risk for opportunistic disease and death after reinitiating continuous antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV previously receiving episodic therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(5):289–299.
    1. Lundgren JD, Babiker A, El-Sadr W, et al. Inferior clinical outcome of the CD4+ cell count-guided antiretroviral treatment interruption strategy in the SMART study: role of CD4+ Cell counts and HIV RNA levels during follow-up. Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(8):1145–1155.
    1. Emery S, Neuhaus JA, Phillips AN, et al. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants and in those not receiving ART at baseline in the SMART study. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(8):1133–1144.
    1. Kaufmann GR, Elzi L, Weber R, et al. Interruptions of cART limits CD4 T-cell recovery and increases the risk for opportunistic complications and death. AIDS. 2011;25(4):441–451.
    1. Havlir DV, Marschner IA, Hirsch MS, et al. Maintenance antiretroviral therapies in HIV-infected subjects with undetectable plasma HIV RNA after triple-drug therapy. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(18):1261–1268.
    1. Pialoux G, Raffi F, Brun-Vezinet F, et al. Trilège (Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA 072) Study Team A randomized trial of three maintenance regimens given after three months of induction therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir in previously untreated HIV-1-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(18):1269–1276.
    1. Opravil M, Hirschel B, Lazzarin A, et al. A randomized trial of simplified maintenance therapy with abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine in human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2002;185(9):1251–1260.
    1. Katlama C, Fenske S, Gazzard B, et al. TRIZAL study: switching from successful HAART to Trizivir (abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine combination tablet): 48 weeks efficacy, safety and adherence results. HIV Med. 2003;4(2):79–86.
    1. Markowitz M, Hill-Zabala C, Lang J, et al. Induction with abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine plus efavirenz for 48 weeks followed by 48-week maintenance with abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine alone in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39(3):257–264.
    1. Mallolas J, Pich J, Penaranda M, et al. Induction therapy with trizivir plus efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir followed by trizivir alone in naive HIV-1-infected adults. AIDS. 2008;22(3):377–384.
    1. Opravil M, Baumann D, Chave JP, et al. Long-term efficacy after switch from protease inhibitor-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy to abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine. AIDS. 2004;18(16):2213–2215.
    1. Delfraissy JF, Flandre P, Delaugerre C, et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy or plus zidovudine and lamivudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 2008;22(3):385–393.
    1. Wilkin TJ, McKinnon JE, DiRienzo AG, et al. Regimen simplification to atazanavir-ritonavir alone as maintenance antiretroviral therapy: final 48-week clinical and virologic outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2009;199(6):866–871.
    1. Bierman WF, van Agtmael MA, Nijhuis M, Danner SA, Boucher CA. HIV monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors: a systematic review. AIDS. 2009;23(3):279–291.
    1. Arribas JR, Pulido F, Delgado R, et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir as single-drug therapy for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression: 48-week results of a randomized, controlled, open-label, proof-of-concept pilot clinical trial (OK Study) J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40(3):280–287.
    1. Arribas JR, Delgado R, Arranz A, et al. OK04 Study Group Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and 2 nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIV: 96-week analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(2):147–152.
    1. Swindells S, DiRienzo AG, Wilkin T, et al. Regimen simplification to atazanavir-ritonavir alone as maintenance antiretroviral therapy after sustained virologic suppression. JAMA. 2006;296(7):806–814.
    1. Karlstrom O, Josephson F, Sonnerborg A. Early virologic rebound in a pilot trial of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir as maintenance monotherapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(4):417–422.
    1. Arribas JR, Horban A, Gerstoft J, et al. The MONET trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml. AIDS. 2010;24(2):223–230.
    1. Katlama C, Valentin MA, Algarte-Genin G, et al. Efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir as single-drug maintenance therapy in patients with HIV-1 viral suppression: a randomized open-label noninferiority trial, MONOI-ANRS 136. AIDS. 2010;24(15):2365–2374.
    1. Gallant JE, DeJesus E, Arribas JR, et al. Study 934 Group Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(3):251–260.
    1. Sax PE, Tierney C, Collier AC, et al. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5202 Team Abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine for initial HIV-1 therapy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(23):2230–2240.
    1. Moyle GJ, Sabin CA, Cartledge J, et al. RAVE (Randomized Abacavir versus Viread Evaluation) Group UK A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy. AIDS. 2006;20(16):2043–2050.
    1. Fisher M, Moyle GJ, Shahmanesh M, et al. SWEET (Simplification With Easier Emtricitabine Tenofovir) Group UK A randomized comparative trial of continued zidovudine/lamivudine or replacement with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine in efavirenz-treated HIV-1-infected individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(5):562–568.
    1. Laurent C, Bourgeois A, Mpoudi-Ngolé E, et al. Tolerability and effectiveness of first-line regimens combining nevirapine and lamivudine plus zidovudine or stavudine in Cameroon. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008;24(3):393–399.
    1. Hawkins C, Achenbach C, Fryda W, et al. Antiretroviral durability and tolerability in HIV-infected adults living in urban Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45(3):304–310.
    1. Mehta U, Maartens G. Is it safe to switch between efavirenz and nevirapine in the event of toxicity? Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7(11):733–738.
    1. Waters L, Fisher M, Winston A, et al. A phase IV, double-blind, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study to assess the feasibility of switching individuals receiving efavirenz with continuing central nervous system adverse events to etravirine. AIDS. 2011;25(1):65–71.
    1. Mallolas J, Podzamczer D, Milinkovic A, et al. ATAZIP Study Group Efficacy and safety of switching from boosted lopinavir to boosted atazanavir in patients with virological suppression receiving a LPV/r-containing HAART: the ATAZIP study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(1):29–36.
    1. Mills AM, Nelson M, Jayaweera D, et al. Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir vs lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week analysis. AIDS. 2009;23(13):1679–1688.
    1. Gatell J, Salmon-Ceron D, Lazzarin A, et al. SWAN Study Group Efficacy and safety of atazanavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with virologic suppression switched from a stable, boosted or unboosted protease inhibitor treatment regimen: the SWAN Study (AI424-097) 48-week results. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(11):1484–1492.
    1. Grant PM, Palmer S, Bendavid E, et al. Switch from enfuvirtide to raltegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected patients: effects on level of residual viremia and quality of life. Clin Virol. 2009;46(4):305–308.
    1. De Castro N, Braun J, Charreau I, et al. EASIER ANRS 138 study group Switch from enfuvirtide to raltegravir in virologically suppressed multidrug-resistant HIV-1-infected patients: a randomized open-label trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(8):1259–1267.
    1. Eron JJ, Young B, Cooper DA, et al. Switch to a raltegravir-based regimen versus continuation of a lopinavir-ritonavir-based regimen in stable HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia (SWITCHMRK 1 and 2): two multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2010;375(9712):396–407.
    1. Martínez E, Larrousse M, Llibre JM, et al. SPIRAL Study Group Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: the SPIRAL study. AIDS. 2010;24(11):1697–1707.
    1. Vispo E, Barreiro P, Maida I, et al. Simplification from protease inhibitors to once- or twice-daily raltegravir: the ODIS trial. HIV Clin Trials. 2010;11(4):197–204.
    1. Gardner EM, Maravi ME, Rietmeijer C, Davidson AJ, Burman WJ. The association of adherence to antiretroviral therapy with healthcare utilization and costs for medical care. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2008;6(2–3):145–155.
    1. Mandalia S, Mandalia R, Lo G, et al. NPMS-HHC Steering Group Rising population cost for treating people living with HIV in the UK, 1997–2013. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15677.
    1. The ADAP Watch Apr, 2011. Available from: . Accessed on 2011 May 13.
    1. Nachega JB, Leisegang R, Bishai D, et al. Association of antiretroviral therapy adherence and health care costs. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(1):18–25.
    1. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naïve patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292(2):191–201.
    1. Milinkovic A, Martinez E, Lopez S, et al. The impact of reducing stavudine dose versus switching to tenofovir on plasma lipids, body composition and mitochondrial function in HIV-infected patients. Antivir Ther. 2007;12(3):407–415.
    1. Treatment Action Campaign Tenofovir: an explanation of why we need TDF-dose combinations and the steps to bring them to the market in South Africa. Available from: ; Accessed on 2011 May 13.
    1. Department of Health, Republic of South Africa The South African Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines 2010. Available from: . Accessed on 2001 May 13.
    1. Rosen S, Long L, Fox M, Sanne I. Cost and cost-effectiveness of switching from stavudine to tenofovir in first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens in South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;48(3):334–344.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe