Phase 1 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin combined with R-GDP for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Randeep Sangha, Andrew Davies, Nam H Dang, Michinori Ogura, David A MacDonald, Revathi Ananthakrishnan, M Luisa Paccagnella, Erik Vandendries, Joseph Boni, Yeow Tee Goh, Randeep Sangha, Andrew Davies, Nam H Dang, Michinori Ogura, David A MacDonald, Revathi Ananthakrishnan, M Luisa Paccagnella, Erik Vandendries, Joseph Boni, Yeow Tee Goh

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) plus rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (R-GDP) in patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Patients received InO plus R-GDP (21-day cycle; six-cycle maximum) using up-and-down dose-escalation schema for gemcitabine and cisplatin to define the highest dosage regimen(s) with acceptable toxicity (Part 1; n = 27). Part 2 (n = 10) confirmed safety and tolerability; Part 3 (n = 18) evaluated preliminary efficacy. Results: Among 55 patients enrolled, 42% were refractory at baseline (median 2 [range, 1-6] prior therapies); 38% had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The highest dosage regimen with acceptable toxicity was InO 0.8 mg/m2, rituximab 375 mg/m2, cisplatin 50 mg/m2, gemcitabine 500 mg/m2 (day 1 only) and dexamethasone 40 mg (days 1-4); this was confirmed in Part 2, in which three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 thrombocytopenia [n = 2], febrile neutropenia [n = 2]). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (any grade, 85%; grade ≥3, 75%) and neutropenia (69%; 62%). Overall (objective) response rate (ORR) was 53% (11 complete, 18 partial responses); ORR was 71%, 33%, and 62% in patients with follicular lymphoma (n = 14), DLBCL (n = 21), and mantle cell lymphoma (n = 13), respectively. Conclusions: InO 0.8 mg/m2 plus R-GDP was associated with manageable toxicity, although gemcitabine and cisplatin doses were lower than in the standard R-GDP regimen due to hematologic toxicity. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed; however, these exploratory data should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and short follow-up duration (Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01055496).

Keywords: B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; CD22+; Inotuzumab ozogamicin; antibody-conjugate; chemotherapy; rituximab.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier’s estimate of (A) progression-free survival, (B) overall survival, and (C) duration of response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between first dose and earliest date of disease progression (including symptomatic deterioration), new anti-lymphoma therapy, or death from any cause, which ever occurred first. Patients without a PFS event were censored at the last valid post baseline tumor assessment date; patients without a PFS event and without a post baseline tumor assessment were censored at the date of first dose. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between the first dose and death from any cause, censored at the date the patient was last known to be alive. Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time between the date of first response and the earliest date of disease progression (including symptomatic deterioration), new anti-lymphoma therapy, or death, which ever occurred first. Patients without an event were censored at the last valid tumor assessment date. Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma includes follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, and low-grade B-cell lymphoma favoring follicular lymphoma. Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma includes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier’s estimate of (A) progression-free survival, (B) overall survival, and (C) duration of response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between first dose and earliest date of disease progression (including symptomatic deterioration), new anti-lymphoma therapy, or death from any cause, which ever occurred first. Patients without a PFS event were censored at the last valid post baseline tumor assessment date; patients without a PFS event and without a post baseline tumor assessment were censored at the date of first dose. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between the first dose and death from any cause, censored at the date the patient was last known to be alive. Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time between the date of first response and the earliest date of disease progression (including symptomatic deterioration), new anti-lymphoma therapy, or death, which ever occurred first. Patients without an event were censored at the last valid tumor assessment date. Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma includes follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, and low-grade B-cell lymphoma favoring follicular lymphoma. Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma includes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. CI: confidence interval.

References

    1. Leonard JP, Coleman M, Ketas JC, et al. . Epratuzumab, a humanized anti-CD22 antibody, in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: phase I/II clinical trial results. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(16):5327-5334.
    1. Cesano A, Gayko U.. CD22 as a target of passive immunotherapy. Semin Oncol. 2003;30(2):253-257.
    1. Vaickus L, Ball ED, Foon KA.. Immune markers in hematologic malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1991;11(4):267-297.
    1. Hinman LM, Hamann PR, Wallace R, et al. . Preparation and characterization of monoclonal antibody conjugates of the calicheamicins: a novel and potent family of antitumor antibiotics. Cancer Res. 1993;53(14):3336-3342.
    1. Hamann PR, Hinman LM, Hollander I, et al. . Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, a potent and selective anti-CD33 antibody–calicheamicin conjugate for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Bioconjug Chem. 2002;13(1):47-58.
    1. DiJoseph JF, Armellino DC, Boghaert ER, et al. . Antibody-targeted chemotherapy with CMC-544: a CD22-targeted immunoconjugate of calicheamicin for the treatment of B-lymphoid malignancies. Blood. 2004;103(5):1807-1814.
    1. Advani A, Coiffier B, Czuczman MS, et al. . Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity of inotuzumab ozogamicin, a novel immunoconjugate for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a phase I study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(12):2085-2093.
    1. Ogura M, Tobinai K, Hatake K, et al. . Phase I study of inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) in Japanese patients with follicular lymphoma pretreated with rituximab-based therapy. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(8):1840-1845.
    1. Ogura M, Hatake K, Ando K, et al. . Phase I study of anti-CD22 immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(5):933-938.
    1. Dang NH, Ogura M, Castaigne S, et al. . Randomized, phase 3 trial of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab (R-InO) versus chemotherapy for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15 Suppl):8529.
    1. Fayad L, Offner F, Smith MR, et al. . Safety and clinical activity of a combination therapy comprising two antibody-based targeting agents for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a phase I/II study evaluating the immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin with rituximab. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(5):573-583.
    1. DiJoseph JF, Dougher MM, Evans DY, et al. . Preclinical anti-tumor activity of antibody-targeted chemotherapy with CMC-544 (inotuzumab ozogamicin), a CD22-specific immunoconjugate of calicheamicin, compared with non-targeted combination chemotherapy with CVP or CHOP. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;67(4):741-749.
    1. Data on file. New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2014.
    1. Gandhi L, Bahleda R, Tolaney SM, et al. . Phase I study of neratinib in combination with temsirolimus in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-dependent and other solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(2):68-75.
    1. Ivanova A, Wang K.. A non-parametric approach to the design and analysis of two-dimensional dose-finding trials. Stat Med. 2004;23(12):1861-1870.
    1. Isakoff SJ, Wang D, Campone M, et al. . Bosutinib plus capecitabine for selected advanced solid tumours: results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(11):2058-2066.
    1. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. . Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):579-586.
    1. Halwani AS, Link BK.. Chemotherapy and antibody combinations for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011;11(3):443-455.
    1. Griffin MM, Morley N.. Rituximab in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma—a critical evaluation of randomized controlled trials. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(5):803-811.
    1. Hagemeister F. Rituximab for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Drugs. 2010;70(3):261-272.
    1. Keating GM. Spotlight on rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, low-grade or follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. BioDrugs. 2011;25(1):55-61.
    1. Tarella C, Zanni M, Magni M, et al. . Rituximab improves the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with autograft for high-risk follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei linfomi survey. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3166-3175.
    1. Crump M, Baetz T, Couban S, et al. . Gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or refractory aggressive histology B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a Phase II study by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG). Cancer. 2004;101(8):1835-1842.
    1. Morschhauser F, Depil S, Jourdan E, et al. . Phase II study of gemcitabine-dexamethasone with or without cisplatin in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(2):370-375.
    1. Griffiths R, Mikhael J, Gleeson M, et al. . Addition of rituximab to chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy improves overall survival in elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Blood. 2011;118(18):4808-4816.
    1. Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G, et al. . Bendamustine plus rituximab versus CHOP plus rituximab as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9873):1203-1210.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe