Panax ginseng modulates cytokines in bone marrow toxicity and myelopoiesis: ginsenoside Rg1 partially supports myelopoiesis

Hanumantha Rao Balaji Raghavendran, Rekha Sathyanath, Jangwoo Shin, Hyeong Keug Kim, Jong Min Han, JungHyo Cho, Chang Gue Son, Hanumantha Rao Balaji Raghavendran, Rekha Sathyanath, Jangwoo Shin, Hyeong Keug Kim, Jong Min Han, JungHyo Cho, Chang Gue Son

Abstract

In this study, we have demonstrated that Korean Panax ginseng (KG) significantly enhances myelopoiesis in vitro and reconstitutes bone marrow after 5-flurouracil-induced (5FU) myelosuppression in mice. KG promoted total white blood cell, lymphocyte, neutrophil and platelet counts and improved body weight, spleen weight, and thymus weight. The number of CFU-GM in bone marrow cells of mice and serum levels of IL-3 and GM-CSF were significantly improved after KG treatment. KG induced significant c-Kit, SCF and IL-1 mRNA expression in spleen. Moreover, treatment with KG led to marked improvements in 5FU-induced histopathological changes in bone marrow and spleen, and partial suppression of thymus damage. The levels of IL-3 and GM-CSF in cultured bone marrow cells after 24 h stimulation with KG were considerably increased. The mechanism underlying promotion of myelopoiesis by KG was assessed by monitoring gene expression at two time-points of 4 and 8 h. Treatment with Rg1 (0.5, 1 and 1.5 µmol) specifically enhanced c-Kit, IL-6 and TNF-α mRNA expression in cultured bone marrow cells. Our results collectively suggest that the anti-myelotoxicity activity and promotion of myelopoiesis by KG are mediated through cytokines. Moreover, the ginsenoside, Rg1, supports the role of KG in myelopoiesis to some extent.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Invivo experimental design (A), C57BL6…
Figure 1. Invivo experimental design (A), C57BL6 (n = 40) were treated with 5FU (200 mg/kg, i.p) on day zero and post-treated (24 h) with KG (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg) for six days, daily once.
Complete blood count (CBC) was taken at 0, 3, 5, 7 10 and 14 day. C57BL6 mice (n = 40) were treated with 5FU (200 mg/kg, i.p) on day zero and post-treated (24 h) with KG (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg) for six days, sacrificed on day 7 for cytokines, histopathology, gene expression and colony forming studies (B). Bone marrow cells isolated from C57BL6 were cultured and treated with KG (0.2, 2, 20 and 200 µg/ml) or Rg1 (0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 µmol/L) at for cytokines (ELISA) and gene expression by semi quantitative and quantitative PCR (C).
Figure 2. Effects of KG on Haematologic…
Figure 2. Effects of KG on Haematologic parameters in 5FU treated mice.
Before and after 24 h of 5FU injection and KG treatment, about 60–100 µl of retro orbital sinus blood was collected using heparin coated capillary tube at different days (0, 3, 5 7 10 and 14) and haematological parameters such as (A) white blood cells (WBC), (B) neutrophils, (C) lymphocytes (absolute number) and (D) platelets were measured. Data were expressed as means ± SD (n = 8). *P<0.05 **P<0.01, normal Vs. 5FU and KG Vs. 5FU.
Figure 3. Effects of KG on Haematologic…
Figure 3. Effects of KG on Haematologic parameters and body weight changes in 5FU treated mice.
Before and after 24 h of 5FU injection and KG treatment, about 60–100 µl of retro orbital sinus blood was collected using heparin coated capillary tube at different days (0, 3, 5 7 10 and 14) parameters such as (A) hemoglobin, (B) red blood cells (RBC), (C) hematocrit and (D) body weight were measured. Data were expressed as means ± SD (n = 8). *P<0.05 **P<0.01, normal Vs. 5FU and KG Vs. 5FU.
Figure 4. Effects of KG on Organ…
Figure 4. Effects of KG on Organ weight and Histopathology.
After 24 h of 5FU injection and 6 days of KG treatment, group of mice were sacrificed under ether anesthesia on day 7 and organ weights such as spleen and thymus were measured using an automated electronic balance (A) Organs such as spleen, thymus and bone marrow were removed and processed for Haematoxylin and Eosin (B). The stained tissues were examined under a light microscope (200X magnifications). Data were expressed as means ± SD. *P<0.05 **P<0.01, a – normal Vs. 5FU, b – KG Vs. 5FU.
Figure 5. Effects of KG on 5FU-induced…
Figure 5. Effects of KG on 5FU-induced changes gene expression in spleen.
Total RNA was extracted from the spleen cells, mRNA of (A) IL-1, (B) SCF, (C) c-Kit and (D) IL-4 were analyzed by semi quantitative PCR using specific forward and reverse primers. Data (means ± SD). *p<0.05, Normal Vs. 5FU and KG Vs. 5FU.
Figure 6. Effects of KG on 5FU…
Figure 6. Effects of KG on 5FU induced changes IL-3, GM-CSF and CFU-GM.
Serum separated from blood collected from abdominal aorta of mice was subjected to cytokine analysis using Elisa kit (A). Bone marrow cells isolated from mice were grown in MethoCult methylcellulose-based complete medium in a 5% CO2 incubator for 14 d (B). Isolated bone marrow cells cultured in 6 well plated treated with KG (0.2, 2, 20 200 µg/ml) for 24 h and conditioned media was subjected to cytokine (pg/ml) analysis using commercial kit method (C &D). Data were expressed as means ± SD. *P<0.05 **P<0.01 compared with normal, a – normal Vs. 5FU, b – KG Vs. 5FU.
Figure 7. Effects of KG on genes…
Figure 7. Effects of KG on genes c-Kit, FasL, IL-1, IL-2 and IL-6 in bone marrow cells.
Bone marrow cells treated with KG (0.2, 2 20 and 200 µg/ml) for 4 and 8 h (n = 3). Total RNA was isolated from bone marrow cells using RNAase mini kit and analyzed by semi quantitative PCR using mouse specific primers. The relative intensities of the bands (F) were determined with the use of the ratios to β actin (normalized) and expressed as percentage (A–E).
Figure 8. Effects of KG on genes…
Figure 8. Effects of KG on genes IL-12, MCP1, TGF-β, IFN-γ and TNF-α in bone marrow cells.
Bone marrow cells treated with KG (0.2, 2 20 and 200 µg/ml) for 4 and 8 h (n = 3). Total RNA was isolated from bone marrow cells using RNAase mini kit and analyzed by semi quantitative PCR using mouse specific primers. The intensities of the bands (F) were determined with the use of the ratios to β actin (normalized) and expressed as percentage (A–E).
Figure 9. Compositional analysis of KG and…
Figure 9. Compositional analysis of KG and role of Ginsinoside Rg1 on IL-6, c-Kit and TNF-α in bone marrow cells.
Column was eluted with solvents A (18% Acetonitrite) and B (80% Acetonitrite) at flow rate of 2.5 ml/min. Solution 100% A and 0% B changing over 32 min, 80% A and 20% B to 80 min, 0% A and 100% B to 100 min, and 100% A and 0% B to 110 min were used, amount of ginsinosides present (n = 3) were expressed in mg/kg (A). (b–d) Bone marrow cultured cells were treated with Ginsinoside Rg1 (0.5, 1 and 1.5 µmol/L) for 4 and 8 h. mRNA isolated from bone marrow cells using Trireagent and products were analyzed by quantitative PCR using specific primers. Results were normalized by using the reference gene, actin, and are represented as percentage versus the reference gene. Data were expressed as means ± SD. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared with 4 h blank control (Untreated), #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 compared with 8 h blank.

References

    1. Lund JE. F. Feldman, J. G. Zinkl, and N. C. Jain, eds.),. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA; 2000. Toxicologic effects on blood and bone marrow, in Schalm's Veterinary Hematology, 5th edition (B. pp. 44–50.
    1. Ryan DH. In Williams Hematology, 6th edition. (E. Beutler, M. A. Lichtman, B. S. Coller, T. J. Kipps, and U. Seligsohn, eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York; 2001. Examination of the blood. pp. 9–16.
    1. Grem JL. 5-Fluorouracil: forty-plus and still ticking. A review of its preclinical and clinical development. Invest New Drugs. 2000;18:299–313.
    1. Tomiak A, Vincent M, Kocha W, Taylor M, Winquist E, et al. Standard dose (Mayo regimen) 5-fluorouracil and low does folinic acid: prohibitive toxicity? Am J Clin Oncol. 2000;23:94–98.
    1. Jodrell DI, Stewart M, Aird R, Knowles G, Bowman, A, et al. 5-Fluorouracil steady state pharmacokinetics and outcome in patients receiving protracted venous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Can. 2001;84:600–603.
    1. Attele AS, Wu JA, Yuan CS. Ginseng pharmacology: Multiple constituents and multiple actions. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;58:1685–1693.
    1. Yance DR, Sagar SM. Targeting angiogenesis with integrative cancer therapies. Integ Can Therap. 2006;5:9–29.
    1. Kim HJ, Kim MH, Byon YY, Park JW, Jee Y, et al. Radioprotective effects of an acidic polysaccharide of Panax ginseng on bone marrow cells. J Vet Sci. 2007;8(1):39–44.
    1. Zhang QH, Wu CF, Duan L, Yang JY. Protective effects of total saponins from stem and leaf of Panax ginseng against cyclophosphamide-induced genotoxicity and apoptosis in mouse bone marrow cells and peripheral lymphocyte cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46:293–302.
    1. Lu XZ, Wang JH, Wu X, Zhou L, Wang L, et al. Ginsenoside Rg1 promotes bone marrow stromal cells proliferation via the activation of the estrogen receptor-mediated signaling pathway. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2008;29(10):1209–1214.
    1. Leung KW, Pon YL, Wong RN, Wong AS, et al. Ginsenoside-Rg1 induces vascular endothelial growth factor expression through the glucocorticoid receptor-related phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and betacatenin/T-cell factor-dependent pathway in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;36:280–288.
    1. Lee YJ, Chung E, Lee KY, Lee YH, Huh B, et al. Ginsenoside- Rg1, one of the major active molecules from Panax ginseng, is a functional ligand of glucocorticoid receptor. Mol Cell Endocrin. 1997;133:135–40.
    1. De Haan G, Donte B, Engel C, Loeffler M, Nijhof W. Prophylactic Pretreatment of Mice with Hematopoietic Growth Factors Induces Expansion of Primitive Cell Compartments and Results in Protection against 5-Fluorouracil -Induced Toxicity. Blood. 1996;87:4581–4588.
    1. Dinarello CA, Savage N. Interleukin-1 and its biologically related cytokines. Adv Immunol. 1989;44:153–156.
    1. Fackler MJ, Krause DS, Smith OM, Civin CI, et al. Full-length but not truncated CD34 inhibits hematopoietic cell differentiation of M1 cells. Blood. 1995;85:3040–3047.
    1. Almeida-Porada G, Ascensao IL. Isolation, characterization and biologic features of bone marrow endothelial cells. J Lab Clin Med. 1996;128:399–407.
    1. Nand S, Sosman J, Godwin JE, Fisher RI. A phase I/II study of sequential interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1994;83:357–360.
    1. Jones AT, Ziltener HJ. Enhancement of the biologic effects of interleukin-3 in vivo by anti-interleukin-3 antibodies. Blood. 1993;82:1133–1141.
    1. Gilmore GL, DePasquale DK, Fischer BC, Shadduck RK. Enhancement of monocytopoiesis by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Exp Hematol. 1995;23:1319–1323.
    1. Lee DW Y, Lau ASY. Effects of Panax ginseng on Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Mediated Inflammation: A Mini-Review. Molecules. 2011;16:2802–2816.
    1. Joo SS, Won TJ, Kim MS, Lee DI. Hematopoietic effect of ginsenoside Rg3 in ICR mouse primary cultures and its application to a biological response modifier. Fitoterapia. 2004;75:337–341.
    1. Koike K, Ogawa M, Ihle JN, Miyake T, Shimizu, et al. Recombinant murine granulocytemacrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor supports formation of GM and multipotential blast cell colonies in culture: comparison with the effects of interleukin-3. J Cell Physiol. 1987;131:458–464.
    1. Leary AG, Yang YC, Clark SC, Gasson JC, et al. Ogawa M. Recombinant gibbon interleukin 3 supports formation of human multilineage colonies and blast cell colonies in culture: comparison with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 1987;70:1343–1348.
    1. Chen D, Wang SL, Wang YP. Experimental study on expression of GM-CSF from human endothelial cells and monocytes induced by total saponins of Panax ginseng. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2003;23(11):845–7.
    1. Gao RL, Chen XH, Lin XJ, Qian, XD, Xu WH, et al. Effects of notoginosides on proliferation and upregulation of GR nuclear transcription factor in hematopoietic cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007;28(5):703–11.
    1. Chen XH, Gao RL, Zhen ZY, Qian XD, Xu WH, et al. Expression of apoptosis-related proteins in the human bone marrow hematopoietic cells treated by Panax Notoginosides. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2006;14(2):343–6.
    1. Leonard JP, Quinto CM, Kozitza MK, Neben TY, Goldman SJ. Recombinant human interleukin- 11(rhIL-11) multilineage hematopoietic recovery in mice after a myelosuppressive regimen of sublethal irradiation and carboplatin. Blood. 1994;83:1499.
    1. Paquette RL, Zhou JY, Yang YC, Clark, SC, Koeffler HP. Recombinant gibbon interleukin-3 acts synergistically with recombinant human G-CSF and GM-CSF in vitro. Blood. 1988;71:1596.
    1. Winton EF, Srinivasiah J, Kim BK, Hillyer CD, Strobert EA, et al. Effect of recombinant human interleukin-6 and rhIL-3 on hematopoietic regeneration as demonstrated in a nonhuman primate chemotherapy model. Blood. 1994;84:65.
    1. Saif MW. Capecitabine versus continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil for colorectal cancer: a retrospective efficacy and safety comparison. Clin Col Can. 2005;5:89–100.
    1. Davis TA, Robinson DH, Lee KP, Kessler SW. Porcine brain microvascular endothelial cells support the in vitro expansion of human primitive hematopoietic bone marrow progenitor cells with a high replanting potent: requirement for cell-to-cell interactions and colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 1995;85:1751–1761.
    1. Zeuner A, Signore M, Martinetti D, Bartucci M, Peschle C, et al. Cancer Res 67: (10) 2007; 2007. Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia Derives from the Selective Death of Megakaryocyte Progenitors and Can Be Rescued by Stem Cell Factor.
    1. Bartold PM, Haynes DR. Interleukin-6 production by human gingival fibroblasts. J Periodon Res. 1991;26:339–345.
    1. Ikebuchi K, Wong GG, Clark SC, Ihle JN, Hirai Y, et al. Interleukin-6 enhancement of interleukin-3-dependent proliferation of multipotential hemopoietic progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1987;84:9035.
    1. Chang YS, Seo EK, Gyllenhaal C, Block KI. Panax ginseng: a role in cancer therapy? Integrat Cancer Therap. 2003;2:13–33.
    1. Yun TK. Experimental and epidemiological evidence on nonorgan specific cancer preventive effect of Korean ginseng and identification of active compounds. Mut Res. 2003;523:63–74.
    1. Rafii S, Shapiro F, Pettengell R, Ferris B, Nachman RL, et al. Human bone marrow microvascular endothelial cells support long-term proliferation and differentiation of myeloid and megakaryocytic progenitors. Blood. 1995;86:3353–3363.
    1. Smith K. Interleukin 2: Inception, impact, and implications. Science. 1998;240:1169.
    1. Metcalf D. The molecular control of cell division, differentiation commitment and maturation in haemopoietic cells. Nature. 1989;339:27.
    1. Reya T, Contractor NV, Couzens MS, Wasik MA, Emerson SG, et al. Abnormal Myelocytic Cell Development in Interleukin-2 (IL-2)–Deficient Mice: Evidence for the Involvement of IL-2 in Myelopoiesis. Carding Blood. 1998;91(8):2935–2947.
    1. Alenzi FQ, Al-Ghamdi SM, Tamimi WG, Al-Sebiany AM, El-Nashar IM, et al. Apoptosis Role of FAS/FAS Ligand System in the Regulation of Myelopoiesis. Yale J Biol Med. 2005;78:25–36.
    1. De Maria R, Zeuner A, Eramao A, Domenichelli C, Bonci D, et al. Negative regulation of erythropoiesis by caspase-mediated cleavage of GATA-1. Nature. 1999;401:489–93.
    1. Dalmau SR, Freitas CS, Savino W. Radio- and chemoprotection of bone marrow cells by opposite cell cycle-acting cytokines. Leukemia Res. 1997;21:93–99.
    1. Smith JW, Urba WJ. The toxic and hematologic effects of interleukin-1 alpha administered in a phase I trial to patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1141–52.
    1. Cashman JD, Eaves CJ, Sarris AH, Eaves AC. MCP-1, not MIP-1a, is the endogenous chemokine that cooperates with TGF-b to inhibit the cycling of primitive normal but not leukemic (CML) progenitors in Long-term human marrow cultures. Blood. 1998;92:2338.
    1. Deonarain R, Verma A, Porter AC, Gewert DR, Platanias LC, et al. Critical roles for IFN-gamma in lymphoid development, myelopoiesis, and tumor development: Links to tumor necrosis factor alpha. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2003;23:13453–13458.
    1. Li WM, Huang WQ, Huang YH, Jiang DZ, Wang QR. Positive and negative haematopoietic cytokines produced by bone marrow endothelial cells. Cytokine. 2000;12(7):1017–1023.
    1. Batard P, Monier MN, Fortunel N, Ducos K, Sansilvestri-Morel P, et al. TGF-b1 maintains hematopoietic immaturity by a reversible negative control of cell cycle and induces CD34 antigen up-modulation. J Cell Sci. 2000;113:383–390.
    1. Vento S, Cainelli F, Temesgen Z. Lung infections after cancer chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:981–992.
    1. Kang XM, Zhang QY, Tong DD, Zhao W. Experimental study on anti-angiogenesis in mice with Lewis lung carcinoma by lowdose of cyclophosphamide combined with ginsenoside Rg3. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2005;25:730–733.
    1. Li HB, Liu WL, Zhang QY, Kang XM, Zhao WH. The efficacy analysis of low-dose cyclophosphamide combined with gimenoside Rg3 on advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Pract Oncol. 2006;20:18–20.
    1. Chen MW, Yao Y, Shi ZH. Observation of curalive effect of combined 20(R)-ginsenoside Rg3 with chemotherapy on non-small – cell lung cancers. Mil Med J South China. 2005;19:4–6.
    1. Roodman GD, Bird A, Hutzler D, Montgomery W. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and hematopoietic progenitors: effects of tumor necrosis factor on growth of erythroid progenitors CFU-E and BFU-E and hematopoietic cell lines K562, HL60, and HEL cells. Exp Hematol. 1987;15:928–935.
    1. Artym J, Zimecki M. The Effects of Lactoferrin on Myelopoiesis: Can we resolve the Controversy? Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2007;61:129–150.
    1. Voog E, Bienvenu J, Warzocha K, Moullet I, Dumontet C, et al. 2. J Clin Oncol 18; 2000. Factors That Predict Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression in Lymphoma Patients: Role of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand-Receptor System. pp. 325–331.
    1. Shi AW, Wang XB, Lu FX, Zhu MM, Kong XQ. Ginsenoside Rg1 promotes endothelial progenitor cell migration and proliferation. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009;30(3):299–306.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe