Efficacy of a text messaging (SMS) based smoking cessation intervention for adolescents and young adults: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial

Severin Haug, Christian Meyer, Andrea Dymalski, Sonia Lippke, Ulrich John, Severin Haug, Christian Meyer, Andrea Dymalski, Sonia Lippke, Ulrich John

Abstract

Background: Particularly in groups of adolescents with lower educational level the smoking prevalence is still high and constitutes a serious public health problem. There is limited evidence of effective smoking cessation interventions in this group. Individualised text messaging (SMS) based interventions are promising to support smoking cessation and could be provided to adolescents irrespective of their motivation to quit. The aim of the current paper is to outline the study protocol of a trial testing the efficacy of an SMS based intervention for smoking cessation in apprentices.

Methods/design: A two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial will be conducted to test the efficacy of an SMS intervention for smoking cessation in adolescents and young adults compared to an assessment only control group. A total of 910 daily or occasional (≥ 4 cigarettes in the preceding month and ≥ 1 cigarette in the preceding week) smoking apprentices will be proactively recruited in vocational school classes and, using school class as a randomisation unit, randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 455) receiving the SMS based intervention or an assessment only control group (n = 455). Individualised text messages taking into account demographic data and the individuals' smoking behaviours will be sent to the participants of the intervention group over a period of 3 months. Participants will receive two text messages promoting smoking cessation per week. Program participants who intend to quit smoking have the opportunity to use a more intensive SMS program to prepare for their quit day and to prevent a subsequent relapse. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of participants with 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence assessed at 6-months follow-up. The research assistants conducting the baseline and the follow-up assessments will be blinded regarding group assignment.

Discussion: It is expected that the program offers an effective and inexpensive way to promote smoking cessation among adolescents and young adults including those with lower educational level and independent of their motivation to quit.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN: ISRCTN19739792.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Global Health Risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: Warning about the dangers of tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Hibell B, Guttormsson U, Ahlström S, Balakireva O, Bjarnason T, Kokkevi A, Kraus L. The 2007 ESPAD report. Substance use among students in 35 European countries. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and other Drugs. 2007.
    1. Radtke T, Keller R, Krebs H, Hornung R. Der Tabakkonsum Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener in den Jahren 2001 bis 2009/10. Zürich: Universität Zürich, Psychologisches Institut, Sozial- und Gesundheitspsychologie; 2011.
    1. Grimshaw GM, Stanton A. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;4:CD003289.
    1. Sussman S, Sun P. Youth tobacco use cessation: 2008 update. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2009;5:3. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-5-3.
    1. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. In: The transtheoretical model and stages of change. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editor. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1997. Health behavior and health education Theory, research, and practice; pp. 60–84.
    1. Willemse I, Waller G, Süss D. 2010. JAMES - Jugend, Aktivität, Medien - Erhebung Schweiz. Zürich: Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften.
    1. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):673–693.
    1. Walters ST, Wright JA, Shegog R. A review of computer and Internet-based interventions for smoking behavior. Addict Behav. 2006;31(2):264–277. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.002.
    1. Free C, Whittaker R, Knight R, Abramsky T, Rodgers A, Roberts IG. Txt2stop: a pilot randomised controlled trial of mobile phone-based smoking cessation support. Tob Control. 2009;18(2):88–91. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.026146.
    1. Rodgers A, Corbett T, Bramley D, Riddell T, Wills M, Lin RB, Jones M. Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging. Tob Control. 2005;14(4):255–261. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011577.
    1. Free C, Knight R, Robertson S, Whittaker R, Edwards P, Zhou W, Rodgers A, Cairns J, Kenward MG, Roberts I. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):49–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60701-0.
    1. Haug S, Meyer C, Gross B, Schorr G, Thyrian JR, Kordy H, Bauer S, Rumpf HJ, John U. Kontinuierliche individuelle Förderung der Rauchabstinenz bei sozial benachteiligten jungen Erwachsenen über das Handy - Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie. Das Gesundheitswesen. 2008;70(6):364–371. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1080932.
    1. Haug S, Meyer C, Schorr G, Bauer S, John U. Continuous individual support of smoking cessation using text messaging: a pilot experimental study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(8):915–923. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp084.
    1. Kaminski A, Nauerth A, Pfefferle PI. Health status and health behaviour of apprentices in the first year of apprenticeship - first results of a survey in vocational training schools in Bielefeld. Das Gesundheitswesen. 2008;70(1):38–46. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022528.
    1. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol- Int Rev. 2008;57(1):1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x.
    1. Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: a practical approach. Chichester: Wiley & Sons; 1994.
    1. Peterson AV Jr, Kealey KA, Mann SL, Marek PM, Ludman EJ, Liu J, Bricker JB. Group-randomized trial of a proactive, personalized telephone counseling intervention for adolescent smoking cessation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(20):1378–1392. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp317.
    1. Perkins HW. The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors, and Clinicians. First. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
    1. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2006;38:69–119.
    1. Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R, Velicer WF. Validity of stage assessment in the adoption and maintenance of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Psychol. 2009;28(2):183–193.
    1. Hughes JR, Keely JP, Niaura RS, Ossip-Klein DJ, Richmond RL, Swan GE. Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5(1):13–25.
    1. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Rickert W, Robinson J. Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br J Addict. 1989;84(7):791–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x.
    1. SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Validation. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002;4:149–159. doi: 10.1080/14622200210123581.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe