The Use of Telerehabilitation Technologies for Cardiac Patients to Improve Rehabilitation Activities and Unify Organizations: Qualitative Study

Birthe Dinesen, Helle Spindler, Birthe Dinesen, Helle Spindler

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death globally causing 31% of all deaths worldwide. The Danish health care system is characterized by fragmented delivery of services and rehabilitation activities. The Teledialog Telerehabilitation Program for cardiac patients was developed and tested to rectify fragmentation and improve the quality of care. The Teledialog program was based on the assumption that a common communication platform shared by health care professionals, patients, and relatives could reduce or eliminate the fragmentation in the rehabilitation process and improve cooperation between the health professionals.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the interorganizational cooperation between health care professionals across sectors (hospitals, municipal health care centers) in a cardiac telerehabilitation program.

Methods: Theories of networks between organizations, the sociology of professions, and the "community of practice" approach were used in a case study of a cardiac telerehabilitation program. A triangulation of data collection techniques were used including documents, participant observation (n=76 hours), and qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals (n=37). Data were analyzed using NVivo 11.0.

Results: The case study of cooperation in an interorganizational context of cardiac telerehabilitation program is characterized by the following key themes and patterns: (1) integrated workflows via a shared digital rehabilitation plan that help integrate workflow between health care professions and organizations, (2) joint clinical practice showed as a community of practice in telerehabilitation developed across professions and organizations, and (3) unifying the organizations as cooperation has advanced via a joint telerehabilitation program across municipalities and hospitals.

Conclusions: The Teledialog Telerehabilitation Program was a new innovative cardiac program tested on a large scale across hospitals, health care centers, and municipalities. Assessments showed that the Teledialog program and its associated technologies helped improve interorganizational cooperation and reduce fragmentation. The program helped integrate the organizations and led to the creation of a community of practice. Further research is needed to explore long-term effects of implementation of telerehabilitation technologies and programs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01752192; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01752192 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6yR3tdEpb).

Keywords: community of practice; cooperation; heart diseases; professional practice; telerehabilitation; workflow.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Birthe Dinesen, Helle Spindler. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 19.11.2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Teledialog Telerehabilitation Network. The small grey square in each “house” represents a mobile device (eg, tablet) that patients have close by and use to transmit information or communicate with health care personnel from home, work or during leisure activities. ECG: electrocardiography.

References

    1. World Health Organization. 2017. May 17, Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)
    1. Blair J, Corrigall H, Angus N, Thompson D, Leslie S. Home versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(2)
    1. Cooper A F, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R. Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2002 Aug;16(5):541–52. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr524oa.
    1. Würgler M W, Sonne LT, Kilsmark J, Voss H, Søgaard J. Danish heart patients' participation in and experience with rehabilitation. Scand J Public Health. 2012 Mar;40(2):126–32. doi: 10.1177/1403494811435487.
    1. Dalal HM, Doherty P, Taylor RS. Cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ. 2015 Sep 29;351:h5000. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5000.
    1. Dalleck LC, Schmidt LK, Lueker R. Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes in a conventional versus telemedicine-based programme. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(5):217–21. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100407.
    1. Fernandez RS, Salamonson Y, Griffiths R, Juergens C, Davidson P. Sociodemographic predictors and reasons for participation in an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme following percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008 Jun;14(3):237–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00685.x.
    1. Vejledning om hjerterehabilitering på sygehuse. Copenhagen, Denmark: Sundhedstyrelsen; 2004. Oct 11, .
    1. National klinisk retningslinje for hjerterehabilitering. Copenhagen, Denmark: Sundhedstyrelsen; 2015. Feb 15, .
    1. Dinesen B. Implementation of telehomecare technology impact on chronically ill patients, healthcare professionals and the healthcare system. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University; 2018. Implementation of telehomecare technology impact on chronically ill patients, healthcare professionals and the healthcare system.
    1. Wadmann S, Strandberg-Larsen M, Vrangbæk Karsten. Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e04.
    1. Strandberg-Larsen M, Nielsen M, Krasnik A. Are joint health plans effective for coordination of health services? An analysis based on theory and Danish pre-reform results. Int J Integr Care. 2007 Mar 10;7(4):1–10.
    1. Morris ME, Aguilera A. Mobile, Social, and Wearable Computing and the Evolution of Psychological Practice. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2012 Dec;43(6):622–626. doi: 10.1037/a0029041.
    1. Auschra C. Barriers to the Integration of Care in Inter-Organisational Settings: A Literature Review. Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3068.
    1. van Duijn Sarah, Zonneveld N, Lara Montero Alfonso, Minkman M, Nies H. Service Integration Across Sectors in Europe: Literature and Practice. Int J Integr Care. 2018 Apr 19;18(2):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3107.
    1. Brorholt G, Jakobsen M, Martinus A, Kjellberg J. En helhjertet indsats? En artikelbaseret klinisk, patientnær og sundhedsøkonomisk kortlægning af hjerte-kar-området. Copenhagen, Denmark: Rosendahls A/S; 2018. .
    1. Brennan D, Tindall L, Theodoros D, Brown J, Campbell M, Christiana D, Smith D, Cason J, Lee A. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. Int J Telerehabil. 2010;2(2):31–4. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2010.6063.
    1. Clark RA, Conway A, Poulsen V, Keech W, Tirimacco R, Tideman P. Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jan;22(1):35–74. doi: 10.1177/2047487313501093.
    1. Piotrowicz E, Piotrowicz R. Cardiac telerehabilitation: current situation and future challenges. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Jun;20(2 Suppl):12–6. doi: 10.1177/2047487313487483c.
    1. Mikołajewska E, Mikołajewska D. Telerehabilitation – current state and clinical perspectives. Heart Res Open J. 2014;1(1):9–13. doi: 10.17140/HROJ-1-102.
    1. Frederix I, Vanhees L, Dendale P, Goetschalckx K. A review of telerehabilitation for cardiac patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Jan;21(1):45–53. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14562732.
    1. Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, Nittari G, Mahdi SS. Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jul 21;4(2):e7. doi: 10.2196/rehab.7511.
    1. Rawstorn JC, Gant N, Direito A, Beckmann C, Maddison R. Telehealth exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016 Dec 01;102(15):1183–92. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308966.
    1. Alter C, Hage J. Organizations Working Together: Coordination in Interorganizational Networks. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications; 1993. Organizations Working Together.
    1. Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa SL, Bagherzadeh M. A Review of Interorganizational Collaboration Dynamics. Journal of Management. 2014 Dec 17;41(5):1338–1360. doi: 10.1177/0149206314563399.
    1. Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: SAGE Publications; 2013. Case Study Research Design and Methods.
    1. Hippel VE. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005. Democratizing Innovations.
    1. Piepoli MF, Corrà Ugo, Benzer W, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Dendale P, Gaita D, McGee H, Mendes M, Niebauer J, Zwisler AO, Schmid J, Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular PreventionRehabilitation Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Feb;17(1):1–17. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283313592.
    1. Abbott A. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.
    1. Wenger E, White N, Joh . Digital Habitats; stewarding technology for communities. Portland, Oregon: CPSQUARE; 2018. Digital Habitats stewarding technology for communities.
    1. Kristiansen S. Deltagende Observation: Introduktion Til En Samfundsvidenskabelig Metode. In: Krogstrup HK, editor. Deltagende Observation: Introduktion Til En Samfundsvidenskabelig Metode. Copenhagen: H. Reitzels; 1999.
    1. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing.
    1. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(2):121–6. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2025.
    1. Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(4):515–22. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105.
    1. Wells S, Rozenblum R, Park A, Dunn M, Bates DW. Organizational strategies for promoting patient and provider uptake of personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):213–22. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003055.
    1. Barlow J, Bayer S, Curry R. Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: Experiences of ‘telecare’. Technovation. 2006 Mar;26(3):396–406. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.010.
    1. Dinesen B, Hejlesen O, Andersen S, Toft E. 15th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics (NBC 2011) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. Telerehabilitation for COPD Patients across Sectors: Using Technology to Promote Cooperation among Healthcare Professionals; pp. 65–68.
    1. Rolls K, Hansen M, Jackson D, Elliott D. How Health Care Professionals Use Social Media to Create Virtual Communities: An Integrative Review. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 16;18(6):e166. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5312.
    1. Busetto L, Luijkx K, Calciolari S, Ortiz LGG, Vrijhoef HJM. Barriers and Facilitators to Workforce Changes in Integrated Care. Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jun 01;18(2):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3587.
    1. Otte-Trojel T, Rundall Tg, de Bont A, van de Klundert J. Can relational coordination help inter-organizational networks overcome challenges to coordination in patient portals? International Journal of Healthcare Management. 2016 Jan 10;10(2):75–83. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2015.1101911.
    1. Mandell M, Steelman T. Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations The importance of typologies, context and management strategies. Public Management Review. 2003 Jun;5(2):197–224. doi: 10.1080/1461667032000066417.
    1. Mair FS, May C, O'Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, Murray E. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012 May 01;90(5):357–64. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099424.
    1. Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) Implement Sci. 2016 Dec 26;11(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7.
    1. Seale C, Silverman D, Gobo G. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2007. Five misunderstandings about case-study research; pp. 390–404.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe