Study protocol for a transversal study to develop a screening model for excessive gambling behaviours on a representative sample of users of French authorised gambling websites

Bastien Perrot, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Jean-Michel Costes, Julie Caillon, Marie Grall-Bronnec, Gaëlle Challet-Bouju, Bastien Perrot, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Jean-Michel Costes, Julie Caillon, Marie Grall-Bronnec, Gaëlle Challet-Bouju

Abstract

Introduction: Since the legalisation of online gambling in France in 2010, gambling operators must implement responsible gambling measures to prevent excessive gambling practices. However, actually there is no screening procedure for identifying problematic gamblers. Although several studies have already been performed using several data sets from online gambling operators, the authors deplored several methodological and clinical limits that prevent scientifically validating the existence of problematic gambling behaviour. The aim of this study is to develop a model for screening excessive gambling practices based on the gambling behaviours observed on French gambling websites, coupled with a clinical validation.

Methods and analysis: The research is divided into three successive stages. All analyses will be performed for each major type of authorised online gambling in France. The first stage aims at defining a typology of users of French authorised gambling websites based on their gambling behaviour. This analysis will be based on data from the Authority for Regulating Online Gambling (ARJEL) and the Française Des Jeux (FDJ). For the second stage aiming at determining a score to predict whether a gambler is problematic or not, we will cross answers from the Canadian Problem Gambling Index with real gambling data. The objective of the third stage is to clinically validate the score previously developed. Results from the screening model will be compared (using sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and positive and negative predictive values) with the diagnosis obtained with a telephone clinical interview, including diagnostic criteria for gambling addiction.

Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee (GNEDS) on 25 March 2015. Results will be presented in national and international conferences, submitted to peer-reviewed journals and will be part of a PhD thesis. A final report with the study results will be presented to the ARJEL, especially the final screening model.

Trial registration number: NCT02415296.

Keywords: Online gambling; classification; latent class model; predictive model.; prevention; problem gambling.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MG-B, JC and GC-B declare that the University Hospital of Nantes has received gambling industry (FDJ and PMU) funding in the form of a sponsorship which supports the gambling section of the BALANCED Unit (the Reference Centre for Excessive Gambling). Scientific independence towards gambling industry operators is warranted. There were no publishing constraints. BP, J-MC and J-BH declare that they have no conflict of interest

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

References

    1. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub 2013.
    1. Costes J-M, Eroukmanoff V, Richard J-B, et al. . Les jeux d’argent et de hasard en France en 2014. Notes ODJ N° 2015;6.
    1. Tovar ML, Costes JM, Eroukmanoff V. Les jeux d’argent et de hasard sur internet en France en 2012. Tendances 2013;85:1–6.
    1. Wood RT, Williams RJ. A comparative profile of the internet gambler: demographic characteristics, game-play patterns, and problem gambling status. New Media Soc 2011;13:1123–41. 10.1177/1461444810397650
    1. Griffiths M. Internet gambling: issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003;6:557–68. 10.1089/109493103322725333
    1. ARJEL. Lutter Contre le jeu excessif ou pathologique. recommandations trois ans après l’adoption de la loi d’ouverture du marché des jeux en ligne.
    1. LaBrie RA, LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, et al. . Assessing the playing field: a prospective longitudinal study of internet sports gambling behavior. J Gambl Stud 2007;23:347–62. 10.1007/s10899-007-9067-3
    1. LaBrie R, Shaffer HJ. Identifying behavioral markers of disordered internet sports gambling. Addict Res Theory 2011;19:56–65. 10.3109/16066359.2010.512106
    1. Broda A, LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, et al. . Virtual harm reduction efforts for internet gambling: effects of deposit limits on actual internet sports gambling behavior. Harm Reduct J 2008;5:27 10.1186/1477-7517-5-27
    1. Philander KS. Identifying high-risk online gamblers: a comparison of data mining procedures. Int Gambl Stud 2014;14:53–63. 10.1080/14459795.2013.841721
    1. Adami N, Benini S, Boschetti A, et al. . Markers of unsustainable gambling for early detection of at-risk online gamblers. Int Gambl Stud 2013;13:188–204. 10.1080/14459795.2012.754919
    1. Dragicevic S, Tsogas G, Kudic A. Analysis of casino online gambling data in relation to behavioural risk markers for high-risk gambling and player protection. Int Gambl Stud 2011;11:377–91. 10.1080/14459795.2011.629204
    1. Luquiens A, Tanguy ML, Benyamina A, et al. . Tracking online poker problem gamblers with player account-based gambling data only. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2016;25:333–42. 10.1002/mpr.1510
    1. Ferris J, Wynne H. The canadian problem gambling index. Ott Can Cent Subst Abuse 2001.
    1. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. Latent class cluster analysis. Appl Latent Cl Anal 2002:89–106.
    1. Fraley C, Raftery AE. How many clusters? which clustering method? answers via model-based cluster analysis. Computer J 1998;41:578–88. 10.1093/comjnl/41.8.578
    1. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 1995;20:273–97.
    1. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn 2001;45:5–32. 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    1. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 1996:267–88.
    1. Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 1958;65:386–408. 10.1037/h0042519
    1. Braverman J, Shaffer HJ. How do gamblers start gambling: identifying behavioural markers for high-risk internet gambling. Eur J Public Health 2012;22 10.1093/eurpub/ckp232
    1. Wickwire EM, Burke RS, Brown SA, et al. . Psychometric evaluation of the National Opinion Research Center DSM-IV Screen for Gambling problems (NODS). Am J Addict 2008;17:392–5. 10.1080/10550490802268934
    1. Devos G, Challet-Bouju G, Burnay J, et al. . Adaptation and validation of the gambling motives Questionnaire-Financial (GMQ-F) in a sample of French-speaking gamblers. Int Gambl Stud 2016:1–15.
    1. Raylu N, Oei TP. The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction 2004;99:757–69. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00753.x
    1. Grall-Bronnec M, Bouju G, Sébille-Rivain V, et al. . A french adaptation of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): a useful tool for assessment of irrational thoughts among gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues 2012;27:1–21. 10.4309/jgi.2012.27.9
    1. Khazaal Y, van Singer M, Chatton A, et al. . Does self-selection affect samples’ representativeness in online surveys? an investigation in online video game research. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e164 10.2196/jmir.2759
    1. Currie SR, Hodgins DC, Casey DM. Validity of the Problem Gambling Severity Index interpretive categories. J Gambl Stud 2013;29:311–27. 10.1007/s10899-012-9300-6
    1. Costes JM, Kairouz S, Eroukmanoff V, et al. . Gambling patterns and problems of gamblers on licensed and unlicensed sites in France. J Gambl Stud 2016;32:79–91. 10.1007/s10899-015-9541-2
    1. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Bouvard A, et al. . Internet poker websites and pathological gambling prevention policy. J Gambl Stud 2013;29:51–9. 10.1007/s10899-011-9288-3
    1. Auer M, Malischnig D, Griffiths M. Is “pop-up” messaging in online slot machine gambling effective as a responsible gambling strategy? Journal of Gambling Issues 2014;29:1–10. 10.4309/jgi.2014.29.3
    1. Caillon J, Grall-Bronnec M, Hardouin JB, et al. . Online gambling’s moderators: how effective? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2015;15:519 10.1186/s12889-015-1846-7

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe