Project STYLE: a multisite RCT for HIV prevention among youths in mental health treatment
Larry K Brown, Wendy Hadley, Geri R Donenberg, Ralph J DiClemente, Celia Lescano, Delia M Lang, Richard Crosby, David Barker, Danielle Oster, Larry K Brown, Wendy Hadley, Geri R Donenberg, Ralph J DiClemente, Celia Lescano, Delia M Lang, Richard Crosby, David Barker, Danielle Oster
Abstract
Objective: The study examined the efficacy of family-based and adolescent-only HIV prevention programs in decreasing HIV risk and improving parental monitoring and sexual communication among youths in mental health treatment.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 721 adolescents (ages 13-18 years) and their caregivers from mental health settings in three U.S. cities were randomly assigned to one of three theory-based, structured group interventions: family-based HIV prevention, adolescent-only HIV prevention, and adolescent-only health promotion. Interventions were delivered during an all-day workshop. Assessments were completed at baseline and three months postintervention.
Results: Compared with those in the health intervention, adolescents in the HIV prevention interventions reported fewer unsafe sex acts (adjusted rate ratio=.49, p=.01), greater condom use (adjusted relative change=59%, p=.01), and greater likelihood of avoiding sex (adjusted odds ratio=1.44, p=.05). They also showed improved HIV knowledge (p<.01) and self-efficacy (p<.05). The family-based intervention, compared with the other interventions, produced significant improvements in parent-teen sexual communication (p<.01), parental monitoring (p<.01), and parental permissiveness (p=.05).
Conclusions: This RCT found that the HIV prevention interventions reduced sexual risk behavior over three months in a large, diverse sample of youths in mental health treatment and that the family-based intervention improved parental monitoring and communication with teens about sex. These interventions show promise.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00496691.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no competing interests.
Source: PubMed