Efficacy and safety of nebivolol in Korean patients with hypertension by age and sex: a subanalysis from the BENEFIT-KOREA study

Kyoung Im Cho, Dong Woon Jeon, Hyo Seung Ahn, Dong Kyu Jin, Hyun Sang Lee, Jong-Young Lee, Hong-Seok Lim, Athanasios J Manolis, Seung-Woon Rha, Sang Won Park, Kyoung Im Cho, Dong Woon Jeon, Hyo Seung Ahn, Dong Kyu Jin, Hyun Sang Lee, Jong-Young Lee, Hong-Seok Lim, Athanasios J Manolis, Seung-Woon Rha, Sang Won Park

Abstract

Background: BENEFIT-KOREA (BEnefits after 24 weeks of NEbivolol administration For essential hypertensIon patients wiTh various comorbidities and treatment environments in Korea) study, an observational study in South Korea, demonstrated the efficacy and safety of nebivolol in Asian patients with essential hypertension with and without comorbidities in real-world settings. We present a subanalysis of the efficacy and safety of nebivolol across age and sex in the BENEFIT-KOREA cohort.

Methods: Adult South Korean patients with essential hypertension participated in the prospective, single-arm, open, observational BENEFIT-KOREA study; 3011 patients received nebivolol as monotherapy or add-on therapy. Changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse rate at 12 and 24 weeks were evaluated. Participants were divided into three age groups-young males and females: < 50 years; middle-aged males and females: ≥50 years to < 70 years; and older males and females: ≥70 years.

Results: The mean age of study participants was 63.5 ± 12.9 years; majority were between 50 and 69 years of age and 40.4% were females. A significant decrease was observed in mean SBP, DBP, and pulse rate from baseline at 12 and 24 weeks in males and females across all age groups analyzed (all P < 0.001 vs. baseline), with no significant difference in mean reduction in SBP and DBP from baseline between sex within the age groups. Majority of reported adverse events were mild. The incidence of adverse events was lower in young participants versus middle-aged and older participants.

Conclusions: Our subanalysis from the real-world BENEFIT-KOREA study in Asian patients with essential hypertension demonstrated the efficacy and safety of once-daily nebivolol across age groups with no between-sex differences.

Trial registration: Name of the registry: clinicaltrials.gov.

Trial registration number: NCT03847350 . Date of registration: February 20, 2019 retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Add-on therapy; Age; Asian; Combination therapy; Essential hypertension; Monotherapy; Nebivolol; Sex.

Conflict of interest statement

AJM received honoraria for lectures from A. Menarini. SWP is an employee of A. Menarini Korea Ltd. KIC, DWJ, HSA, DKJ, HSL, JYL, HSL, and SWR declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Concomitant medications (other than anti-hypertensives) by age and sex in the safety population in the BENEFIT-Korea study; b Prevalence of hypertension by sex and age in the safety population in the BENEFIT-Korea study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean change from baseline in (a) systolic blood pressure (SBP), and (b) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Paired t-test; P < 0.05 significance; *P < 0.001 compared to baseline
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean change from baseline in pulse rate after 12 and 24 weeks; Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation; Paired t-test; P < 0.05 significance; *P < 0.001 compared to baseline

References

    1. Vögele A, Johansson T, Renom-Guiteras A, Reeves D, Rieckert A, Schlender L, et al. Effectiveness and safety of beta blockers in the management of hypertension in older adults: a systematic review to help reduce inappropriate prescribing. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(Suppl 1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0575-4.
    1. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, et al. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm hg, 1990-2015. JAMA. 2017;317:165–182. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19043.
    1. Choi HM, Kim HC, Kang DR. Sex differences in hypertension prevalence and control: analysis of the 2010-2014 Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178334.
    1. Gillis EE, Sullivan JC. Sex differences in hypertension: recent advances. Hypertension. 2016;68:1322–1327. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.06602.
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology: ESH/ESC task force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018;36:2284–2309. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001961.
    1. Chow CK, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Islam S, Gupta R, Avezum A, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. JAMA. 2013;310:959–968. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.184182.
    1. Chu SH, Baek JW, Kim ES, Stefani KM, Lee WJ, Park YR, et al. Gender differences in hypertension control among older Korean adults: Korean social life, health, and aging project. J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48:38–47.
    1. Gudmundsdottir H, Høieggen A, Stenehjem A, Waldum B, Os I. Hypertension in women: latest findings and clinical implications. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2012;3:137–146. doi: 10.1177/2040622312438935.
    1. Hage FG, Mansur SJ, Xing D, Oparil S. Hypertension in women. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:352–356. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2013.76.
    1. Muiesan ML, Salvetti M, Rosei CA, Paini A. Gender differences in antihypertensive treatment: myths or legends? High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2016;23:105–113. doi: 10.1007/s40292-016-0148-1.
    1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e67–492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558.
    1. Kim HC, Ihm SH, Kim GH, Kim JH, Kim KI, Lee HY, et al. 2018 Korean Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension: part I-epidemiology of hypertension. Clin Hypertens. 2019;25:16. doi: 10.1186/s40885-019-0121-0.
    1. Everett B, Zajacova A. Gender differences in hypertension and hypertension awareness among young adults. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2015;61:1–17. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2014.929488.
    1. Mancia G, Grassi G. The autonomic nervous system and hypertension. Circ Res. 2014;114:1804–1814. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302524.
    1. Baker SE, Limberg JK, Dillon GA, Curry TB, Joyner MJ, Nicholson WT. Aging alters the relative contributions of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system to blood pressure control in women. Hypertension. 2018;72:1236–1242. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11550.
    1. Olawi N, Krüger M, Grimm D, Infanger M, Wehland M. Nebivolol in the treatment of arterial hypertension. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;125:189–201. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13248.
    1. Shin J, Choi YJ, Hong GR, Jeon DW, Kim DH, Koh YY, et al. Real-world efficacy and safety of nebivolol in Korean patients with hypertension from the BENEFIT KOREA study. J Hypertens. 2020;38:527–535. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002296.
    1. Lee HY, Shin J, Kim GH, Park S, Ihm SH, Kim HC, et al. 2018 Korean Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension: part II-diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Clin Hypertens. 2019;25:20. doi: 10.1186/s40885-019-0124-x.
    1. Flather MD, Shibata MC, Coats AJ, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Parkhomenko A, Borbola J, et al. SENIORS Investigators. Randomized trial to determine the effect of nebivolol on mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with heart failure (SENIORS) Eur Heart J. 2005;26:215–225. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi115.
    1. Thomopoulos C, Parati G, Zanchetti A. Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality: 14 - effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs in older and younger patients: overview and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2018;36:1637–1647. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001777.
    1. Kallistratos MS, Poulimenos LE, Manolis AJ. Vasodilator β-blockers: a different class of antihypertensive agents? Futur Cardiol. 2014;10:669–671. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.51.
    1. Van Bortel LM, Fici F, Mascagni F. Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol compared with other antihypertensive drugs: a meta-analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8:35–44. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200808010-00005.
    1. Germino FW, Lin Y, Pejović V, Bowen L. Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol: does age matter? A retrospective analysis of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials in stage I-II hypertension. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;6:185–199. doi: 10.1177/1753944712459593.
    1. Ladage D, Reidenbach C, Rieckeheer E, Graf C, Schwinger RH, Brixius K. Nebivolol lowers blood pressure and increases weight loss in patients with hypertension and diabetes in regard to age. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2010;56:275–281. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181eb4ff2.
    1. Del Colle S, Morello F, Rabbia F, Milan A, Naso D, Puglisi E, et al. Antihypertensive drugs and the sympathetic nervous system. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007;50:487–496. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318135446c.
    1. Chiladakis JA, Georgiopoulou E, Alexopoulos D. Autonomic effects of nebivolol versus atenolol in healthy subjects. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2004;18:469–473. doi: 10.1007/s10557-004-6224-0.
    1. Maffei A, Vecchione C, Aretini A, Poulet R, Bettarini U, Gentile MT, et al. Characterization of nitric oxide release by nebivolol and its metabolites. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19:579–586. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.09.021.
    1. Denic A, Glassock RJ, Rule AD. Structural and functional changes with the aging kidney. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016;23:19–28. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.08.004.
    1. Glassock RJ, Rule AD. The implications of anatomical and functional changes of the aging kidney: with an emphasis on the glomeruli. Kidney Int. 2012;82:270–277. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.65.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe