Validity and reliability of an adapted arabic version of the long international physical activity questionnaire

Khalil Helou, Nour El Helou, Maya Mahfouz, Yara Mahfouz, Pascale Salameh, Mireille Harmouche-Karaki, Khalil Helou, Nour El Helou, Maya Mahfouz, Yara Mahfouz, Pascale Salameh, Mireille Harmouche-Karaki

Abstract

Background: The International Physical Actvity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is a validated tool for physical activity assessment used in many countries however no Arabic version of the long-form of this questionnaire exists to this date. Hence, the aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate an Arabic version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (AIPAQ) equivalent to the French version (F-IPAQ) in a Lebanese population.

Methods: The guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation provided by the World Health Organization and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire committee were followed. One hundred fifty-nine students and staff members from Saint Joseph University of Beirut were randomly recruited to participate in the study. Items of the A-IPAQ were compared to those from the F-IPAQ for concurrent validity using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Content validity of the questionnaire was assessed using factor analysis for the A-IPAQ's items. The physical activity indicators derived from the A-IPAQ were compared with the body mass index (BMI) of the participants for construct validity. The instrument was also evaluated for internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Finally, thirty-one participants were asked to complete the A-IPAQ on two occasions three weeks apart to examine its test-retest reliability. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the extent of agreement between the two versions of the questionnaire and its repeated administrations.

Results: A high correlation was observed between answers of the F-IPAQ and those of the A-IPAQ, with Spearman's correlation coefficients ranging from 0.91 to 1.00 (p < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed a high level of agreement between the two versions with all values scattered around the mean for total physical activity (mean difference = 5.3 min/week, 95% limits of agreement = -145.2 to 155.8). Negative correlations were observed between MET values and BMI, independent of age, gender or university campus. The A-IPAQ showed a high internal consistency reliability with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.769-1.00 (p < 0.001) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging from 0.625-0.999 (p < 0.001), except for a moderate agreement with the moderate garden/yard activity (alpha = 0.682; ICC = 0.518; p < 0.001). The A-IPAQ had moderate-to-good test-retest reliability for most of its items (ICC ranging from 0.66-0.96; p < 0.001) and the Bland-Altman analysis showed a satisfactory agreement between the two administrations of the A-IPAQ for total physical activity (mean difference = 99.8 min/week, 95% limits of agreement = -1105.3; 1304.9) and total vigorous and moderate physical activity (mean difference = -29.7 min/week, 95% limits of agreement = -777.6; 718.2).

Conclusion: The modified Arabic version of the IPAQ showed acceptable validity and reliability for the assessment of physical activity among Lebanese adults. More studies are necessary in the future to assess its validity compared to a gold-standard criterion measure.

Keywords: Arabic IPAQ; International physical activity questionnaire; Physical activity; Reliability; Validity.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of “Saint Joseph University of Beirut” (USJ-2012-19). Participants were fully informed about the purpose and procedures of the study before reading and signing the informed consent form.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland Altman plot of the Total PA measured with the French and Arabic IPAQs. Mean difference = 5.3 min/week, 95% limits of agreement = −145.2 to 155.8

References

    1. Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174:801–809. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351.
    1. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Oct 16]. Available from:
    1. World Health Organisation WHO. Physical activity [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 26]. Available from:
    1. Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE, Ekelund U, Freedson PS, Gary RA, et al. Guide to the assessment of physical activity: clinical and research applications a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128:2259–2279. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000435708.67487.da.
    1. Kim Y, Park I, Kang M. Convergent validity of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ): meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16:440–452. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012002996.
    1. Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M. The international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:755–762. doi: 10.1079/PHN2005898.
    1. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
    1. The IPAQ group. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) – short and long forms. [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2015 Oct 28]. Available from:
    1. The IPAQ group. Cultural adaptation - international physical activity questionnaire [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 16]. Available from:
    1. World Health Organization WHO. WHO | Management of substance abuse - process of translation and adaptation of instruments [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 16]. Available from:
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
    1. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz BF. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures - supported by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Institute of Work & Health. [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2015 Oct 21]. Available from: .
    1. Al-Bannay H, Jarus T, Jongbloed L, Yazigi M, Dean E. Culture as a variable in health research: perspectives and caveats. Health Promot Int. 2014;29:549–557. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat002.
    1. Antunes B, Daveson B, Ramsenthaler C, Benalia H, Ferreira PL. The Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS) manual for cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. 2012 [cited 2015 Oct 16]; Available from:
    1. Weidmer B. Issues and guidelines for translation in cross-cultural research. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods 1994 (Vol. 2).
    1. Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48:175–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x.
    1. Nejjari C, El Fakir S, Bendahhou K, El Rhazi K, Abda N, Zidouh A, et al. Translation and validation of European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire -C30 into Moroccan version for cancer patients in Morocco. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:228. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-228.
    1. Vasheghani-Farahani A, Tahmasbi M, Asheri H, Ashraf H, Nedjat S, Kordi R. The Persian, last 7-day, long form of the international physical activity questionnaire: translation and validation study. Asian J Sports Med. 2011;2:106. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.34781.
    1. Oyeyemi AL, Oyeyemi AY, Adegoke BO, Oyetoke FO, Aliyu HN, Aliyu SU, et al. The short international physical activity questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, validation and reliability of the Hausa language version in Nigeria. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-156.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and overweight [Internet]. [cited 2016 May 14]. Available from:
    1. Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22:195–201. doi: 10.4103/1117-1936.173959.
    1. Macfarlane D, Chan A, Cerin E. Examining the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the international physical activity questionnaire, long form (IPAQ-LC) Public Health Nutr. 2011;14:443–450. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002806.
    1. Van Holle V, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Van Cauwenberg J, Van Dyck D. Assessment of physical activity in older Belgian adults: validity and reliability of an adapted interview version of the long international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ-L) BMC Public Health. 2015;15:433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1785-3.
    1. Pedišić Ž, Jurakić D, Rakovac M, Hodak D, Dizdar D. Reliability of the Croatian long version of the international physical activity questionnaire. Kineziologija. 2011;43:185–191.
    1. Baumeister SE, Ricci C, Kohler S, Fischer B, Töpfer C, Finger JD, et al. Physical activity surveillance in the European Union: reliability and validity of the European health interview survey-physical activity questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ) Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:61. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0386-6.
    1. Oyeyemi AL, Bello UM, Philemon ST, Aliyu HN, Majidadi RW, Oyeyemi AY. Examining the reliability and validity of a modified version of the international physical activity questionnaire, long form (IPAQ-LF) in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005820.
    1. Geisinger KF. Cross-cultural normative assessment: translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1994;6:304. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.304.
    1. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417–1432. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N.
    1. Wang W-L, Lee H-L, Fetzer SJ. Challenges and strategies of instrument translation. West J Nurs Res. 2006;28:310–321. doi: 10.1177/0193945905284712.
    1. Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, Zhang XE, Jaceldo KB. An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nurs Res. 2001;50:300–304. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200109000-00008.
    1. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021.
    1. Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1970;1:185–216. doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301.
    1. Hemmingsson E, Ekelund U. Is the association between physical activity and body mass index obesity dependent? Int J Obes. 2007;31:663–668.
    1. Elbelt U, Schuetz T, Hoffmann I, Pirlich M, Strasburger CJ, Lochs H. Differences of energy expenditure and physical activity patterns in subjects with various degrees of obesity. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:766–772. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.05.003.
    1. MoE/LEDO. Construction. State Environ. Rep. 2001 [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2017 Apr 26]. Available from:
    1. MoE/UNDP/ECODIT . State of the environment report in Lebanon-third edition. 2011.
    1. Sibai AM, Costanian C, Tohme R, Assaad S, Hwalla N. Physical activity in adults with and without diabetes: from the “high-risk” approach to the “population-based” approach of prevention. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1002. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1002.
    1. Zahreddine N, Hady RT, Chammai R, Kazour F, Hachem D, Richa S. Psychiatric morbidity, phenomenology and management in hospitalized female foreign domestic workers in Lebanon. Community Ment Health J. 2014;50:619–628. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9682-7.
    1. University of York Department of Health Sciences. Measuring Health and Disease-The validity of measurement methods. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Oct 21]. Available from:
    1. Brown JD. What is construct validity. JALT Test Eval SIG Newsl. 2000;4:7–10.
    1. The IPAQ group. IPAQ scoring protocol - International Physical Activity Questionnaire [Internet]. [cited 2017 Feb 17]. Available from:

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe