Cognitive interference from food cues in weight loss maintainers, normal weight, and obese individuals

Suzanne Phelan, Jason Hassenstab, Jeanne M McCaffery, Lawrence Sweet, Hollie A Raynor, Ronald A Cohen, Rena R Wing, Suzanne Phelan, Jason Hassenstab, Jeanne M McCaffery, Lawrence Sweet, Hollie A Raynor, Ronald A Cohen, Rena R Wing

Abstract

Much attention has been paid to the behavioral characteristics of successful weight loss maintenance, but less is known about the cognitive processes that underlie this process. The purpose of this study was to investigate cognitive interference from food-related cues in long-term weight loss maintainers (WLM; N = 15) as compared with normal weight (NW; N = 19) and obese (OB; N = 14) controls. A Food Stroop paradigm was used to determine whether successful WLM differed from controls in both the speed and accuracy of color naming words for low-calorie and high-calorie foods. A significant group × condition interaction for reaction time was observed (P = 0.04). In post hoc analyses, no significant differences in reaction time across the three groups were observed for the low-calorie foods (P = 0.66). However, for the high-calorie foods, WLM showed a significantly slower reaction time than the NW (0.04) and OB (0.009) groups (885 ± 17.6, 834 ± 15.8, 816 ± 18.3 ms, respectively). No significant group differences were seen for number of correct trials in 45 s (P = 0.12). The differential interference among WLM did not appear to generalize to other types of distracters (i.e., nonfood). Overall, findings from this study suggest that WLM differ from OB and NW controls in their cognitive responses to high-calorie food cues. Future research is needed to better understand why this bias exists and whether and how interventions can change cognitive processes to better facilitate long-term weight control.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reaction time among weight loss maintainer (n = 15), normal weight (n = 19), and obese (n =14) groups during the Food Stroop. NW, normal weight; OB, obese; WLM, weight loss maintainers.

References

    1. Phelan S, Lang W, Jordan D, Wing RR. Use of artificial sweeteners and fat-modified foods in weight loss maintainers and always-normal weight individuals. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009;33:1183–1190.
    1. Phelan S, Roberts M, Lang W, Wing RR. Empirical evaluation of physical activity recommendations for weight control in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1832–1836.
    1. Klem ML, Wing RR, McGuire MT, Seagle HM, Hill JO. A descriptive study of individuals successful at long-term maintenance of substantial weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:239–246.
    1. Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Kempen KP, Saris WH. Determinants of weight maintenance in women after diet-induced weight reduction. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:1–6.
    1. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Experimenl Psychol. 1935;18:643–662.
    1. Williams JM, Mathews A, MacLeod C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull. 1996;120:3–24.
    1. Overduin J, Jansen A, Louwerse E. Stroop interference and food intake. Int J Eat Disord. 1995;18:277–285.
    1. Perpiñá C, Hemsley D, Treasure J, de Silva P. Is the selective information processing of food and body words specific to patients with eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 1993;14:359–366.
    1. Johansson L, Lundh L-G,, Andersson G. Attentional bias for negative self-words in young women: The role of thin ideal priming and body shape dissatisfaction. Personality Indiv Diff. 2005;38:723–733.
    1. Ben-Tovim DI, Walker MK. Further evidence for the Stroop Test as a quantitative measure of psychopathology in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 1991;10:609–613.
    1. Francis JA, Stewart SH, Hounsell S. Dietary restraint and the selective processing forbidden and nonforbidden food words. Cog Ther Res. 1997;21:633–646.
    1. Green MW, Rogers PJ. Selective attention to food and body shape words in dieters and restrained nondieters. Int J Eat Disord. 1993;14:515–517.
    1. Long CG, Hinton C, Gillespie NK. Selective processing of food and body size words: application of the Stroop Test with obese restrained eaters, anorexics, and normals. Int J Eat Disord. 1994;15:279–283.
    1. Markus H, Hamill R, Sentis KP. Thinking fat: Self-schemas for body weight and the processing of weight relevant information. J Applied Soc Psychol. 1987;17:50–71.
    1. Wing RR, Phelan S. Long-term weight loss maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:222S–225S.
    1. McCaffery JM, Haley AP, Sweet LH, et al. Differential functional magnetic resonance imaging response to food pictures in successful weight-loss maintainers relative to normal-weight and obese controls. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:928–934.
    1. Golden C. Stroop Color and Word Test. Stoelting: Chicago; 1978.
    1. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:71–83.
    1. Allison DB, Kalinsky LB, Gorman BS. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three measures of dietary restraint. Psychol Assess. 1992;4:391–398.
    1. Lansbergen MM, Kenemans JL, van Engeland H. Stroop interference and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology. 2007;21:251–262.
    1. Faunce GJ. Eating disorders and attentional bias: a review. Eat Disord. 2002;10:125–139.
    1. Vasey MW, MacLeod C.Information-processing factors in childhood anxiety: A review and developmental perspective Vasey MW, Dadds MR.eds). The Developmental Psychopathology of Anxiety Oxford University Press: New York, NY; 2001253–277.
    1. Tiffany ST. A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Rev. 1990;97:147–168.
    1. Lavy E, Van den Hout M. Selective attention evidenced by pictorial and linguistic Stroop tasks. Behav Ther. 1993;24:645–657.
    1. Ben-Tovim DI, Walker MK, Fok D, Yap E. An adaptation of the Stroop Test for measuring shape and food concerns in eating disorders: A quantitative measure of psychopathology. Int J Eat Disord. 1989;8:681–687.
    1. Boon B, Vogelzang L, Jansen A. Do restrained eaters show attention toward or away from food, shape and weight stimuli. Euro Eat Disord Rev. 2000;8:51–58.
    1. MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986;95:15–20.
    1. MacLeod C, Mathews A. Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1988;40:653–670.
    1. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980;32:3–25.
    1. Draycott S, Dabbs A. Cognitive dissonance. 1: An overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice in clinical psychology. Br J Clin Psychol. 1998;37 (Pt 3):341–353.
    1. Elliot A, Carlsmith JM. Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1963;66:584.
    1. Dalgleish T. Performance on thee motional Stroop task in groups of anxious, expert and control subjects: A comparison of computer and card presentation formats. Cog Emotion. 1995;9:341–362.
    1. Klinger E.The contents of thoughts: Interference as the downside of adaptive normal mechanisms in thought flow Sarason IG, Pierce GR, Sarason BR.eds). Cognitive Interference: Theories, Methods & Findings Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ; 19963–22.
    1. Channon S, Hayward A. The effect of short-term fasting on processing of food cues in normal subjects. Int J Eat Disord. 1990;9:447–452.
    1. Stewart SH, Samoluk SB. Effects of short-term food deprivation and chronic dietary restraint on the selective processing of appetitive-related cues. Int J Eat Disord. 1997;21:129–135.
    1. Green MW, Rogers PJ. Impairments in working memory associated with spontaneous dieting behaviour. Psychol Med. 1998;28:1063–1070.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe