Normal reference values of strength in pelvic floor muscle of women: a descriptive and inferential study

Francine Chevalier, Carolina Fernandez-Lao, Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas, Francine Chevalier, Carolina Fernandez-Lao, Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas

Abstract

Background: To describe the clinical, functional and quality of life characteristics in women with Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI). In addition, to analyse the relationship between the variables reported by the patients and those informed by the clinicians, and the relationship between instrumented variables and the manual pelvic floor strength assessment.

Methods: Two hundred and eighteen women participated in this observational, analytical study. An interview about Urinary Incontinence and the quality of life questionnaires (EuroQoL-5D and SF-12) were developed as outcomes reported by the patients. Manual muscle testing and perineometry as outcomes informed by the clinician were assessed. Descriptive and correlation analysis were carried out.

Results: The average age of the subjects was (39.93 ± 12.27 years), (24.49 ± 3.54 BMI). The strength evaluated by manual testing of the right levator ani muscles was 7.79 ± 2.88, the strength of left levator ani muscles was 7.51 ± 2.91 and the strength assessed with the perineometer was 7.64 ± 2.55. A positive correlation was found between manual muscle testing and perineometry of the pelvic floor muscles (p < .001). No correlation was found between outcomes of quality of life reported by the patients and outcomes of functional capacity informed by the physiotherapist.

Conclusion: A stratification of the strength of pelvic floor muscles in a normal distribution of a large sample of women with SUI was done, which provided the clinic with a baseline. There is a relationship between the strength of the pelvic muscles assessed manually and that obtained by a perineometer in women with SUI. There was no relationship between these values of strength and quality of life perceived.

References

    1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A, Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61:37–49. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02243-4.
    1. Hunskaar S, Van Geelen JM. The epidemiology of female urinary incontinence. Eur Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;1(1):3–11. doi: 10.1007/s11296-004-0004-z.
    1. Martínez Agulló E. Terminología de la función del tracto urinario inferior. Actas Urol Esp. 2005;29(1):5–7. doi: 10.1016/S0210-4806(05)73192-2.
    1. Botlero R, Davis SR, Urquhart DM, Shortreed S, Bell RJ. Age-specific prevalence of, and factors associated with, different types of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling Australian women assessed with a validated questionnaire. Maturitas. 2009;62(2):134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.017.
    1. Milsom I, Ekelund P, Molander U, Arvidsson L, Areskoug B. The influence of age, parity, oral contraception, hysterectomy and menopause on the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women. J Urol. 1993;149(6):1459–1462.
    1. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG. 2000;107(12):1460–1470. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11669.x.
    1. Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Wood GC. Urinary incontinence inwomen: variation in prevalence estimates and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 Pt. 1):324–331. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000267220.48987.17.
    1. Rekers H, Drogendijk AC, Valkenburg HA, Riphagen F. The menopause, urinary incontinence and other symptoms of the genito-urinary tract. Maturitas. 1992;15:101–111. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(92)90244-X.
    1. Kegel AH. Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1948;56:238–248.
    1. Thakar R, Stanton S. Management of urinary incontinence in women. Br Med J. 2000;321:1326–1331. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1326.
    1. Freeman RM. The role of pelvic floor muscle training in urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111:37–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00464.x.
    1. Hay-Smith E, Bø K, Berghmans L, Hendriks H, deBie R, van Waalwijk van Doorn ES: Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007,(1):CD001407.
    1. Kegel AH. Stress incontinence and genital relaxation. Ciba Clin Symp. 1952;4(2):35–51.
    1. Bø K, Sherburn M. Evaluation of female pelvic floor muscle function and strength. Phys Ther. 2005;85:269–282.
    1. Bø K, Kvarstein B, Hagen R, Larsen S. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: I. Reliability of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:471–477. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930090503.
    1. Bø K, Kvarstein B, Hagen R, Larsen S. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II.Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9:479–487. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930090504.
    1. Abrams P, Andersson K, Brubaker LT, Cardozo L, Cottenden A, Denis L. Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and faecal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth, UK: Health Publication Ltd; 2005. pp. 1589–1630.
    1. Laycock J. Clinical evaluation of the pelvic floor. In: Schussler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton SL, editors. Pelvic Floor Re-education. London, United Kingdom: Springer-Verlag; 1994. pp. 42–48.
    1. Badía X, Roset M, Montserrat S, Herdman M, Segura A. The Spanish version of EuroQol: a description and its applications. European Quality of Life scale. Med Clin (Barc) 1999;112:79–85.
    1. Luo X, Lynn George M, Kakouras I, Edwards C, Pietrobon R, Richardson W. Rieability, validity and responsiveness of the short form 12–item survey (SF–12) in patients with back pain. Spine. 2003;1:1739–1745.
    1. Vilagut G, Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Garin O, Lopez-Garcia E, Alonso J. Interpretation of SF-36 and SF-12 questionnaires in Spain: physical and mental components. Med Clin (Barc) 2008;130:726–735. doi: 10.1157/13121076.
    1. Ferreira CH, Barbosa PB, de Oliveira Souza F, Antônio FI, Franco MM, Bø K. Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford grading scale and the Peritron manometer. Physiotherapy. 2011;97(2):132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.06.007.
    1. Kegel AH. Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1948;56:238–249.
    1. Isherwood P, Rane A. Comparative assessment of pelvic floor strength using a perineometer and digital examination. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;107:1007–1011. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb10404.x.
    1. Espuña Pons M, Puig Clota M, Pérez González A, Rebollo Alvarez P. Stress urinary incontinence: first cause of incontinence among women referred to an urogynecologic unit. Arch Esp Urol. 2004;57(6):633–640.
    1. Petricelli CD, Resende AP, Elito Júnior J, Araujo Júnior E, Alexandre SM, Zanetti MR, Nakamura MU. Distensibility and strength of the pelvic floor muscles of women in the third trimester of pregnancy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:437867. doi: 10.1155/2014/437867.
    1. Morin M, Dumoulin C, Bourbonnais D, Gravel D, Lemieux MC. Pelvic floor maximal strength using vaginal digital assessment compared to dynamometric measurements. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):336–341. doi: 10.1002/nau.20021.
    1. Hundley AF, Wu JM, Visco AG. A comparison of perineometer to brink score for assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1583–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.015.
    1. Bø K, Finckenhagen HB. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and the comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:883–887. doi: 10.1080/791200641.
    1. Martínez Agulló E, Ruíz Cerdá JL, Gómez Pérez L, Rebollo P, Pérez M, Chaves J. Impact of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder syndrome on health-related quality of life of working middle-aged patients and institutionalized elderly patients. Actas Urol Esp. 2010;34(3):242–250. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2009.09.001.
    1. Fialkow MF, Melville JL, Lentz GM, Miller EA, Miller J, Fenner DE. The functional and psychosocial impact of fecal incontinence on women with urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(1):127–129. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.548.
    1. Monz B, Pons ME, Hampel C, Hunskaar S, Quail D, Samsioe G, Sykes D, Wagg A, Papanicolaou S. Patient-reported impact of urinary incontinence--results from treatment seeking women in 14 European countries. Maturitas. 2005;30;52(Suppl 2):S24–S34. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.09.005.
    1. Martínez-Agulló E, Ruíz Cerda JL, Arlandis Guzmán S, Rebollo P, Pérez M, Chaves J, Grupode Estudio Cooperativo EPICC Prevalence of urinary incontinence and hyperactive bladder in the Spanish population: results of the EPICC study. Actas Urol Esp. 2009;33(2):159–166. doi: 10.1016/S0210-4806(09)74117-8.
    1. Espuña Pons M, Castro Díaz D, Carbonell C, Dilla T. Comparison between the “ICIQ-UI Short Form” Questionnaire and the “King’s Health Questionnaire” as assessment tools of urinary incontinence among women. Actas Urol Esp. 2007;31(5):502–510. doi: 10.1016/S0210-4806(07)73674-4.
    1. Seshan V, Muliira JK. Self-reported urinary incontinence and factors associated with symptom severity in community dwelling adult women: implications for women’s health promotion. BMC Womens Health. 2013;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-16.
    1. Sykes D, Castro R, Pons ME, Hampel C, Hunskaar S, Papanicolaou S, Quail D, Samsioe G, Voss S, Wagg A, Monz BU. Characteristics of female outpatients with urinary incontinence participating in a 6-month observational study in 14 European countries. Maturitas. 2005;52(Suppl 2):S13–S23. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.09.003.
    1. Chang SR, Chen KH, Lin HH, Chao YM, Lai YH. Comparison of the effects of episiotomy and no episiotomy on pain, urinary incontinence, and sexual function 3 months postpartum: a prospective follow-up study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(4):409–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.017.
    1. Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM, Kaczorowski J, Jorgensen SH, Franco ED, Johnson B, Waghorn K, Gelfand MM, Guralnick MS. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(3):591–598. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90070-1.
    1. Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M. Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2004;19;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-4-4.
    1. de Souza Santos CR, Santos VL. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in a random sample of the urban population of Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2010;18(5):903–910. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692010000500010.
    1. Córcoles MB, Sánchez SA, Bachs GJ, Moreno DM, Navarro PH, Rodríguez VJ. Quality of life in patients with urinary incontinence. Actas Urol Esp. 2008;32(2):202–210. doi: 10.1016/S0210-4806(08)73814-2.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe