Per cent of patients with chronic migraine who responded per onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle: PREEMPT

Stephen D Silberstein, David W Dodick, Sheena K Aurora, Hans-Christoph Diener, Ronald E DeGryse, Richard B Lipton, Catherine C Turkel, Stephen D Silberstein, David W Dodick, Sheena K Aurora, Hans-Christoph Diener, Ronald E DeGryse, Richard B Lipton, Catherine C Turkel

Abstract

Objective: The approved use of onabotulinumtoxinA for prophylaxis of headaches in patients with chronic migraine (CM) involves treatment every 12 weeks. It is currently unknown whether patients who fail to respond to the first onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle will respond to subsequent treatment cycles. To help inform decisions about treating non-responders, we examined the probability of treatment cycle 1 non-responders responding in cycle 2, and cycle 1 and 2 non-responders responding in cycle 3.

Methods: Pooled PREEMPT data (two studies: a 24-week, 2-cycle, double-blind, randomised (1:1), placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase, followed by a 32-week, 3-cycle, open-label phase) evaluated onabotulinumtoxinA (155-195 U) for prophylaxis of headaches in persons with CM (≥15 days/month with headache ≥4 h/day). End points of interest included the proportion of study patients who first achieved a ≥50% reduction in headache days, moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, or a ≥5-point improvement in Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6. For treatment cycle 1, all eligible participants were included. For subsequent cycles, responders in a previous cycle were no longer considered first responders.

Results: Among onabotulinumtoxinA-treated patients (n=688) 49.3% had a ≥50% reduction in headache-day frequency during treatment cycle 1, with 11.3% and 10.3% of patients first responding during cycles 2 and 3, respectively. 54.2%, 11.6% and 7.4% of patients first responded with a ≥50% reduction in cumulative hours of headache, and 56.3%, 14.5% and 7.7% of patients first responded with a ≥5-point improvement in total HIT-6 during treatment cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Conclusions: A meaningful proportion of patients with CM treated with onabotulinumtoxinA who did not respond to the first treatment cycle responded in the second and third cycles of treatment.

Trial registration number: NCT00156910, NCT00168428.

Keywords: BOTULINUM TOXIN; HEADACHE; MIGRAINE.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phase III REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) study design. Reprinted from ref. 10.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Per cent of first-time responders* with a ≥50% improvement from baseline in treatment cycles 1, 2 and 3 for multiple headache outcome measures (HIT, Headache Impact Test). *First-time responders for a given time point are patients who never responded at any previous time points.

References

    1. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24(Suppl 1):9–160.
    1. Bigal ME, Serrano D, Reed M, et al. . Chronic migraine in the population: burden, diagnosis, and satisfaction with treatment. Neurology 2008;71:559–66.
    1. Natoli J, Manack A, Dean B, et al. . Global prevalence of chronic migraine: a systematic review. Cephalalgia 2010;30:599–609.
    1. Olesen J; Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) . The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33:629–808.
    1. Dodick DW. Clinical practice. Chronic daily headache. N Engl J Med 2006;354:158–65.
    1. Aurora S. Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2006;7:1085–95.
    1. Mathew NT. The prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache. Headache 2006;46:1552–64.
    1. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD. Migraine prevention. Pract Neurol 2007;7:383–93.
    1. Aurora SK, Winner P, Freeman MC, et al. . OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled analyses of the 56-week PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2011;51:1358–73.
    1. Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse R, et al. . OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50:921–36.
    1. Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. . OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia 2010;30:804–14.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, et al. . Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149–58.
    1. Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, et al. . Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 2008;28:484–95.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlof C, et al. . Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: second edition. Cephalalgia 2000;20:765–86.
    1. Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. . OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia 2010;30:793–803.
    1. Blumenfeld A, Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, et al. . Method of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment paradigm based on the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache 2010;50:1406–18.
    1. Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, et al. . A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res 2003;12:963–74.
    1. Bayliss MS, Batenhorst AS. The HIT-6™: a user's guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2002.
    1. Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Diener H-C, et al. . OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients who received all five treatment cycles in the PREEMPT clinical program. Acta Neurol Scand 2014;129:61–70.
    1. Burstein R, Zhang X, Levy D, et al. . Selective inhibition of meningeal nociceptors by botulinum neurotoxin type A: therapeutic implications for migraine and other pains. Cephalalgia 2014;34:853–69.
    1. Aoki KR, Francis J. Updates on the antinociceptive mechanism hypothesis of botulinum toxin A. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2011;17(Suppl 1):S28–33.
    1. McMahon SB, Lewin GR, Wall PD. Central hyperexcitability triggered by noxious inputs. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1993;3:602–10.
    1. Woolf CJ, Doubell TP. The pathophysiology of chronic pain—increased sensitivity to low threshold A beta-fibre inputs. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1994;4:525–34.
    1. Woolf CJ. Somatic pain—pathogenesis and prevention. Br J Anaesth 1995;75:169–76.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe