Maintenance of clinical remission in early axial spondyloarthritis following certolizumab pegol dose reduction

Robert Bm Landewé, Désirée van der Heijde, Maxime Dougados, Xenofon Baraliakos, Filip E Van den Bosch, Karl Gaffney, Lars Bauer, Bengt Hoepken, Owen R Davies, Natasha de Peyrecave, Karen Thomas, Lianne Gensler, Robert Bm Landewé, Désirée van der Heijde, Maxime Dougados, Xenofon Baraliakos, Filip E Van den Bosch, Karl Gaffney, Lars Bauer, Bengt Hoepken, Owen R Davies, Natasha de Peyrecave, Karen Thomas, Lianne Gensler

Abstract

Background: The best strategy for maintaining clinical remission in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has not been defined. C-OPTIMISE compared dose continuation, reduction and withdrawal of the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor certolizumab pegol (CZP) following achievement of sustained remission in patients with early axSpA.

Methods: C-OPTIMISE was a two-part, multicentre phase 3b study in adults with early active axSpA (radiographic or non-radiographic). During the 48-week open-label induction period, patients received CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W). At Week 48, patients in sustained remission (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <1.3 at Weeks 32/36 and 48) were randomised to double-blind CZP 200 mg Q2W (full maintenance dose), CZP 200 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W; reduced maintenance dose) or placebo (withdrawal) for a further 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was remaining flare-free (flare: ASDAS ≥2.1 at two consecutive visits or ASDAS >3.5 at any time point) during the double-blind period.

Results: At Week 48, 43.9% (323/736) patients achieved sustained remission, of whom 313 were randomised to CZP full maintenance dose, CZP reduced maintenance dose or placebo. During Weeks 48 to 96, 83.7% (87/104), 79.0% (83/105) and 20.2% (21/104) of patients receiving the full maintenance dose, reduced maintenance dose or placebo, respectively, were flare-free (p<0.001 vs placebo in both CZP groups). Responses in radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA patients were comparable.

Conclusions: Patients with early axSpA who achieve sustained remission at 48 weeks can reduce their CZP maintenance dose; however, treatment should not be completely discontinued due to the high risk of flare following CZP withdrawal.

Trial registration number: NCT02505542, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis; anti-TNF; spondyloarthritis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RL: Consulting fees and/or research grants from AbbVie, Ablynx, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering and UCB Pharma. DvDH: Consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda and UCB Pharma; director of Imaging Rheumatology BV. MD: Consultancy/speaker fees/research grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. XB: Consultancy/speaker fees/research grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma and grant/research support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene. FVdB: Consultancy fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; speakers bureau fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. KG: Consulting fees, research grants and speaker fees from AbbVie, Celgene, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. OD, NdP, LB, BH: Employees of UCB Pharma. KT: Independent statistician contracted to UCB Pharma. LSG: Grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis and UCB Pharma; consulting fees from Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Janssen.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
C-OPTIMISE study design (panel A) and patient disposition (panel B). AE, adverse event; axSpA, axial spondyloarthritis; CZP, certolizumab pegol; LD, loading dose; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks. *Includes patients in the escape arm who completed week 96.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients free of flares during the maintenance period of C-OPTIMISE. Panel A shows the proportions of patients who did not experience flares following randomisation to CZP full maintenance dose (200 mg Q2W), CZP reduced maintenance dose (200 mg Q4W) or placebo. Panel B shows a Kaplan-Meier plot of time to flare. Missing values were imputed using non-responder imputation. Flare was defined as ASDAS ≥2.1 at two consecutive visits, or ASDAS >3.5 at any visit. CZP, certolizumab pegol; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patients with radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis not experiencing flares during the maintenance period of C-OPTIMISE. axSpA, axial spondyloarthritis; CZP, certolizumab pegol; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks.

References

    1. Sieper J, Poddubnyy D. Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet 2017;390:73–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31591-4
    1. Smolen JS, Schöls M, Braun J, et al. . Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international Task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:3–17. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211734
    1. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R, et al. . 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:978–91. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210770
    1. Feldtkeller E, Khan MA, van der Heijde D, et al. . Age at disease onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 2003;23:61–6. 10.1007/s00296-002-0237-4
    1. Boonen A, Sieper J, van der Heijde D, et al. . The burden of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2015;44:556–62. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.10.009
    1. Baraliakos X, Braun J. Non-Radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: what are the similarities and differences? RMD Open 2015;1:e000053. 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000053
    1. Westhovens R, Annemans L. Costs of drugs for treatment of rheumatic diseases. RMD Open 2016;2:e000259. 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000259
    1. Emery P, Hammoudeh M, FitzGerald O, et al. . Sustained remission with etanercept tapering in early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1781–92. 10.1056/NEJMoa1316133
    1. Hindryckx P, Zou GY, Feagan BG, et al. . Biologic drugs for induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2017:CD012751.
    1. Edwards CJ, Fautrel B, Schulze-Koops H, et al. . Dosing down with biologic therapies: a systematic review and clinicians' perspective. Rheumatology(Oxford) 2017;56:1847–56. 10.1093/rheumatology/kew464
    1. Landewé R, Sieper J, Mease P, et al. . Efficacy and safety of continuing versus withdrawing adalimumab therapy in maintaining remission in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (ABILITY-3): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 2018;392:134–44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31362-X
    1. Navarro-Compán V, Plasencia-Rodríguez C, de Miguel E, et al. . Anti-Tnf discontinuation and tapering strategies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review. Rheumatology 2016;55:1188–94. 10.1093/rheumatology/kew033
    1. van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Landewé R, et al. . Sustained efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes of certolizumab pegol in axial spondyloarthritis: 4-year outcomes from RAPID-axSpA. Rheumatology 2017;56:1498–509. 10.1093/rheumatology/kex174
    1. Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Kay J, et al. . A fifty-two-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of certolizumab pegol in nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1101–11. 10.1002/art.40866
    1. Machado PM, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, et al. . Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS): 2018 update of the nomenclature for disease activity states. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:1539. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213184
    1. Machado P, Landewé R, Lie E, et al. . Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS): defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:47–53. 10.1136/ard.2010.138594
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, et al. . The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25–31. 10.1136/ard.2010.133645
    1. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8. 10.1002/art.1780270401
    1. Anderson JJ, Baron G, van der Heijde D, et al. . Ankylosing spondylitis assessment group preliminary definition of short-term improvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:1876–86. 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8&lt;1876::AID-ART326&gt;;2-F
    1. Brandt J, Listing J, Sieper J, et al. . Development and preselection of criteria for short term improvement after anti-TNF alpha treatment in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:1438–44. 10.1136/ard.2003.016717
    1. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. . A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2286–91.
    1. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, et al. . A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2281–5.
    1. Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, et al. . Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:1694–8.
    1. van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Feldtkeller E. Proposal of a linear definition of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology index (BASMI) and comparison with the 2-step and 10-step definitions. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:489–93. 10.1136/ard.2007.074724
    1. Landewé RB, Hermann K-GA, van der Heijde D, et al. . Scoring sacroiliac joints by magnetic resonance imaging. A multiple-reader reliability experiment. J Rheumatol 2005;32:2050–5.
    1. Lukas C, Braun J, van der Heijde D, et al. . Scoring inflammatory activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis: a multireader experiment. J Rheumatol 2007;34:862–70.
    1. Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Spoorenberg A, van Tubergen A, et al. . Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:127–32. 10.1136/ard.62.2.127
    1. Gratacós J, Pontes C, Juanola X, et al. . Non-inferiority of dose reduction versus standard dosing of TNF-inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2019;21:11. 10.1186/s13075-018-1772-z
    1. Molto A, Gossec L, Meghnathi B, et al. . An Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)-endorsed definition of clinically important worsening in axial spondyloarthritis based on ASDAS. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:124–7. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212178

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe