A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sirukumab in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis

Wolfgang A Schmidt, Bhaskar Dasgupta, Raashid Luqmani, Sebastian H Unizony, Daniel Blockmans, Zhihong Lai, Regina H Kurrasch, Ivana Lazic, Kurt Brown, Ravi Rao, Wolfgang A Schmidt, Bhaskar Dasgupta, Raashid Luqmani, Sebastian H Unizony, Daniel Blockmans, Zhihong Lai, Regina H Kurrasch, Ivana Lazic, Kurt Brown, Ravi Rao

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirukumab in giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-part phase 3 trial (NCT02531633; Part A [52-week double-blind treatment]; Part B [104-week follow-up]), patients with GCA were randomised (3:3:2:2:2) to sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks plus 6-month or 3-month prednisone taper, sirukumab 50 mg every 4 weeks plus 6-month prednisone taper, or placebo every 2 weeks plus 6-month or 12-month prednisone taper. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in sustained remission at week 52. Secondary endpoints included disease flare and safety. The study was terminated early (October 2017; sponsor decision).

Results: Of 161 patients randomised (sirukumab: n = 107; placebo: n = 54), 28 (17.4%) completed week 52 (median treatment duration: 24-30 weeks). In a revised intent-to-treat (ITT) subgroup (completed week 52 or discontinued before study termination [n = 55]); six patients (all receiving sirukumab) achieved the primary endpoint. In the ITT population (n = 161), the proportion of patients with flares (week 2-52) was lower with sirukumab (18.4-30.8%) than placebo (37.0-40.0%). The proportion of patients with flares (week 2-12) was highest with sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks plus 3-month prednisone taper (23.1%). In Part A, 94.4% of patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 19.3% reported serious TEAEs. The proportions of patients with TEAEs were generally similar across treatment arms. No deaths occurred.

Conclusions: Although data were limited due to early termination and shortened treatment duration, sirukumab treatment resulted in numerically lower proportions of patients with flare by week 52 versus placebo, with no unexpected safety findings.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02531633.

Keywords: Clinical trial; Corticosteroid taper; Giant cell arteritis; Interleukin-6; Sirukumab.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design (as originally planned). aRescue glucocorticoid permitted without the requirement to withdraw. bOptional (investigator discretion). q2w every 2 weeks, q4w every 4 weeks
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient disposition. aApplies to patients who withdrew early from the study or who attended with week 52 visit of Part A and did not enter Part B. bViolation of inclusion/exclusion criteria. cOther: sponsor request. dPatients who received ≥ 1 dose SC sirukumab/placebo. ePatients who received ≥ 1 dose of SC sirukumab/placebo and completed 52 weeks (n = 28) or discontinued prior to study termination (n = 27). All patients who were randomised received their allocated treatment. A total of 26 patients continued to Part B; 8/26 received ≥ 1 dose of open-label sirukumab. No patients completed the 104-week extension phase; this was due to early withdrawal or study termination (25 patients withdrawn at sponsor request; one lost to follow-up). ITT intent-to-treat, q2w every 2 weeks, q4w every 4 weeks, SC subcutaneous
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change in inflammatory markers from baseline to week 52: a C-reactive protein and b erythrocyte sedimentation rate (safety population). q2w every 2 weeks, q4w every 4 weeks, SC subcutaneous

References

    1. Salvarani C, Crowson CS, O'Fallon WM, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE. Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty-year period. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:264–268. doi: 10.1002/art.20227.
    1. Stone JH, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S, et al. Trial of tocilizumab in giant-cell arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:317–328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849.
    1. Dasgupta B, Borg FA, Hassan N, et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology. 2010;49:1594–1597. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq039a.
    1. Liddle J, Bartlam R, Mallen CD, et al. What is the impact of giant cell arteritis on patients’ lives? A UK qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017073.
    1. Pineles SL. Giant cell arteritis. 2019. . Accessed 9 Mar 2020.
    1. Villa-Forte A. Giant cell arteritis: suspect it, treat it promptly. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78:265–270. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.78a.10131.
    1. Amiri N, De Vera M, Choi HK, Sayre EC, Avina-Zubieta JA. Increased risk of cardiovascular disease in giant cell arteritis: a general population-based study. Rheumatology. 2016;55:33–40. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev262.
    1. Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S, et al. 2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:19–30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672.
    1. Docken WP. Treatment of giant cell arteritis. 2019. . Accessed 1 July 2019.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Giant cell arteritis. 2014. . [Accessed 3 June 2019].
    1. Hachulla E, Boivin V, Pasturel-Michon U, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term evolution in a cohort of 133 patients with giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001;19:171–176.
    1. Alba MA, García-Martínez A, Prieto-González S, et al. Relapses in patients with giant cell arteritis: prevalence, characteristics, and associated clinical findings in a longitudinally followed cohort of 106 patients. Medicine. 2014;93:194–201. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000033.
    1. Labarca C, Koster MJ, Crowson CS, et al. Predictors of relapse and treatment outcomes in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology. 2016;55:347–356. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev348.
    1. Mainbourg S, Addario A, Samson M, et al. Prevalence of giant cell arteritis relapse in patients treated with glucocorticoids: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72:838–849. doi: 10.1002/acr.23901.
    1. Meskimen S, Cook TD, Blake RL., Jr Management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(2061–8):73.
    1. Fraser JA, Weyand CM, Newman NJ, Biousse V. The treatment of giant cell arteritis. Rev Neurol Dis. 2008;5:140–152.
    1. Proven A, Gabriel SE, Orces C, O'Fallon WM, Hunder GG. Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:703–708. doi: 10.1002/art.11388.
    1. Low C, Conway R. Current advances in the treatment of giant cell arteritis: the role of biologics. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2019;11:1759720X19827222. doi: 10.1177/1759720X19827222.
    1. Chandran A, Udayakumar PD, Kermani TA, Warrington KJ, Crowson CS, Matteson EL. Glucocorticoid usage in giant cell arteritis over six decades (1950 to 2009) Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33:S-98–S-102.
    1. Evans J, Steel L, Borg F, Dasgupta B. Long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis and large vessel vasculitis. RMD Open. 2016;2:e000137. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000137.
    1. Terrades-Garcia N, Cid MC. Pathogenesis of giant-cell arteritis: how targeted therapies are influencing our understanding of the mechanisms involved. Rheumatology. 2018;57:ii51–ii62. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex423.
    1. Dasgupta B, Panayi GS. Interleukin-6 in serum of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1990;29:456–458. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/29.6.456.
    1. Unizony S, Kermani TA. IL-6 blockade and its therapeutic success in giant cell arteritis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38:551–558. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000713.
    1. Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Segarra M, Vilardell C, et al. Tissue production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, TNFalpha and IL-6) correlates with the intensity of the systemic inflammatory response and with corticosteroid requirements in giant-cell arteritis. Rheumatology. 2004;43:294–301. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh058.
    1. Emilie D, Liozon E, Crevon MC, et al. Production of interleukin 6 by granulomas of giant cell arteritis. Hum Immunol. 1994;39:17–24. doi: 10.1016/0198-8859(94)90096-5.
    1. van der Geest KS, Abdulahad WH, Rutgers A, et al. Serum markers associated with disease activity in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Rheumatology. 2015;54:1397–1402. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu526.
    1. Garcia-Martinez A, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Espigol-Frigole G, et al. Clinical relevance of persistently elevated circulating cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6) in the long-term follow-up of patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:835–841. doi: 10.1002/acr.20043.
    1. Miyabe C, Miyabe Y, Strle K, et al. An expanded population of pathogenic regulatory T cells in giant cell arteritis is abrogated by IL-6 blockade therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:898–905. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210070.
    1. Stone JH, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S, et al. Glucocorticoid doses and acute-phase reactants at giant cell arteritis flare in a randomized trial of tocilizumab. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1329–38. doi: 10.1002/art.40876.
    1. Xu Z, Bouman-Thio E, Comisar C, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of a human anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody (sirukumab) in healthy subjects in a first-in-human study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72:270–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03964.x.
    1. Takeuchi T, Thorne C, Karpouzas G, et al. Sirukumab for rheumatoid arthritis: the phase III SIRROUND-D study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:2001–2008. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211328.
    1. Aletaha D, Bingham CO, 3rd, Tanaka Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of sirukumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-TNF therapy (SIRROUND-T): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017;389:1206–1217. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30401-4.
    1. International Council for Harmoisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). ICH E6 good clinical practice. 2016. . Accessed 9 Mar 2020.
    1. National Institutes for Health (NIH) National Cancer Institute. National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE v4.03). 2010. . Accessed 9 Mar 2020.
    1. Calderon-Goercke M, Loricera J, Aldasoro V, et al. Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis. Observational, open-label multicenter study of 134 patients in clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;49(1):126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003.
    1. Thorne C, Takeuchi T, Karpouzas GA, et al. Investigating sirukumab for rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from the phase III SIRROUND-D study. RMD Open. 2018;4:e000731. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000731.
    1. Taylor PC, Schiff MH, Wang Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of monotherapy with sirukumab compared with adalimumab monotherapy in biologic-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (SIRROUND-H): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational, 52-week, phase 3 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:658–666. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212496.
    1. Villiger PM, Adler S, Kuchen S, et al. Tocilizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in giant cell arteritis: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1921–1927. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00560-2.
    1. Jagpal A, Curtis JR. Gastrointestinal perforations with biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: implications for clinicians. Drug Saf. 2018;41:545–553. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0639-1.
    1. Samson M, Devilliers H, Ly KH, et al. Tocilizumab as an add-on therapy to glucocorticoids during the first 3 months of treatment of giant cell arteritis: a prospective study. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;57:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.06.008.
    1. Schmidt WA, Hofheinz K, Burger S, Schafer VS, Juche A. Eligibility of patients with giant cell arteritis for entry into a prospective randomised controlled trial: A single-centre experience. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl):A1496.
    1. Rothwell PM. Factors that can affect the external validity of randomised controlled trials. PLoS Clin Trials. 2006;1:e9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010009.
    1. Murad MH, Katabi A, Benkhadra R, Montori VM. External validity, generalisability, applicability and directness: a brief primer. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23:17–19. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110800.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe