Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an in-home respite care program in supporting informal caregivers of people with dementia: design of a comparative study

Sophie Vandepitte, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Koen Putman, Sofie Verhaeghe, Lieven Annemans, Sophie Vandepitte, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Koen Putman, Sofie Verhaeghe, Lieven Annemans

Abstract

Background: Frequent hospitalization and permanent nursing home placement not only affect the well-being of persons with dementia, but also place great financial strain on society. Therefore, it is important to create effective strategies to support informal caregivers so that they can continue to perform their demanding role. Preliminary qualitative evidence suggests that community-based respite services can actually be important for caregivers, and that the level of evidence should be further established in terms of effectiveness. Therefore, a comparative study to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an in-home respite care program will be initiated.

Methods: This manuscript described a quasi-experimental study to assess (cost)-effectiveness of an in-home respite care program to support informal caregivers of persons with dementia.

Study population: 124 informal caregivers and persons with dementia will be included in the intervention group and will receive an in-home respite care program by an organization called Baluchon Alzheimer. 248 dyads will be included in the control group and will receive standard dementia care. The primary outcome is caregiver burden. Secondary outcomes are: quality of life of caregivers, frequency of behavioral problems of persons with dementia and the reactions of caregivers to those problems, intention to institutionalize the care-recipient, time to nursing home placement, resource use of the care-recipient, and willingness to pay for in-home respite care. When the trial demonstrates a difference in outcomes between both groups, within-trial and modeled cost-effectiveness analyses will be conducted in a separate economic evaluation plan to evaluate possible cost-effectiveness of the in-home respite care program compared to the control group receiving standard dementia care. Finally, the model based cost-effectiveness analyses will allow to extrapolate effects over a longer time horizon than the duration of the trial.

Discussion: This study will have great added value because to date no studies measured effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an in-home respite care program of the Baluchon type. Results of this trial can thus give much more insight in potential benefits and disadvantages of community-based respite care. Conclusions based on this trial can help policy-makers in elaborating future directions of dementia care.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02630446 .

Keywords: Community-based respite care; Comparative study; Cost effectiveness; Dementia; Effectiveness; In-home respite care; Informal caregivers.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
timeline of primary and secondary endpoints of the trial

References

    1. Van Mierlo LD, Meiland FJ, Van der Roest HG, Droes RM. Personalised caregiver support: effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in subgroups of caregivers of people with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27:1–14. doi: 10.1002/gps.2694.
    1. Boots LM, de Vugt ME, van Knippenberg RJ, Kempen GI, Verhey FR. A systematic review of Internet-based supportive interventions for caregivers of patients with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29:331–344. doi: 10.1002/gps.4016.
    1. Jensen M, Agbata IN, Canavan M, McCarthy G. Effectiveness of educational interventions for informal caregivers of individuals with dementia residing in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30:130–143. doi: 10.1002/gps.4208.
    1. Cooke DD, McNally L, Mulligan KT, Harrison MJ, Newman SP. Psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health. 2001;5:120–135. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2001.11070746.
    1. Van’t Leven N, Prick AE, Groenewoud JG, Roelofs PD, de Lange J, Pot AM. Dyadic interventions for community-dwelling people with dementia and their family caregivers: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25:1581–1603. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000860.
    1. Thinnes A, Padilla R. Effect of educational and supportive strategies on the ability of caregivers of people with dementia to maintain participation in that role. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:541–549. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.002634.
    1. Gendron M. Baluchon alzheimer: a respite care and home support service for caregivers of Alzheimer’s patients. Can Alzheimer Dis Rev. 2001;7:4–7.
    1. Thompson CA, Spilsbury K, Hall J, Birks Y, Barnes C, Adamson J. Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-7-18.
    1. Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Helping caregivers of persons with dementia: which interventions work and how large are their effects? Int Psychogeriatr. 2006;18:577–595. doi: 10.1017/S1041610206003462.
    1. Vernooij-Dassen M, Draskovic I, McCleery J, Downs M. Cognitive reframing for carers of people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;11:Cd005318.
    1. Martin-Carrasco M, Ballesteros-Rodriguez J, Dominguez-Panehon AI, Munoz-Hermoso P, Gonzalez-Fraile E. Interventions for caregivers of patients with dementia. Actas Espanolas De Psiquiatria. 2014;42:300–314.
    1. Sorensen S, Duberstein P, Gill D, Pinquart M. Dementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:961–973. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70599-3.
    1. Vandepitte S, Van Den Noortgate N, Putman K, Verhaeghe S, Faes K, Annemans L. Effectiveness of supporting informal caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. J Alzheimers Dis. Accepted in 2016, In Press.
    1. Vandepitte S, Van Den Noortgate N, Putman K, Verhaeghe S, Verdonck C, Annemans L. Effectiveness of respite care in supporting informal caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. Accepted in 2016, In Press.
    1. Zanetti O, Solerte SB, Cantoni F. Life expectancy in alzheimer’s disease. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49:237–243. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.09.035.
    1. Brookmeyer R, Corrada MM, Curriero FC, Kawas C. Survival following a diagnosis of alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1764–1767. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.11.1764.
    1. Teri L, Truax P, Logsdon R, Uomoto J, Zarit S, Vitaliano PP. Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: the revised memory and behavior problems checklist. Psychol Aging. 1992;7:622–631. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.622.
    1. Wimo A, Gustavsson A, Jonsson L, Winblad B, Hsu MA, Gannon B. Application of resource utilization in dementia (RUD) instrument in a global setting. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:429–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.06.008.
    1. Martin-Carrasco M, Dominguez-Panchon AI, Gonzalez-Fraile E, Munoz-Hermoso P, Ballesteros J. Effectiveness of a psychoeducational intervention group program in the reduction of the burden experienced by caregivers of patients with dementia the EDUCA-II randomized trial. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2014;28:79–87. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000003.
    1. Hebert R, Bravo G, Preville M. Reliability, validity and reference values of the zarit burden interview for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with dementia. Can J Aging. 2000;19:494–507. doi: 10.1017/S0714980800012484.
    1. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bachpeterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly - correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980;20:649–655. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.6.649.
    1. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. 2001;33:337–343. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087.
    1. Janssen MF, Pickard MS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, Swinburn P, Busschbach J. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1717–1727. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4.
    1. Morycz RK. Caregiving strain and the desire to institutionalize family members with alzheimer’s disease. Possible predictors and model development. Res Aging. 1985;7:329–361. doi: 10.1177/0164027585007003002.
    1. Belle SH, Burgio L, Burns R, Coon D, Czaja SJ, Gallagher-Thompson D, Gitlin LN, Klinger J, Koepke KM, Lee CC, et al. Enhancing the quality of life of dementia caregivers from different ethnic or racial groups: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:727–738. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00005.
    1. McCaskill GM, Burgio LD, DeCoster J, Roff LL. The use of Morycz’s desire-to-institutionalize scale across three racial/ethnic groups. J Aging Health. 2011;23:195–202. doi: 10.1177/0898264310381275.
    1. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, Crook T. The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139:1136–1139. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136.
    1. Wattel L, Achterberg W. UNO-COG toolkit: cognitieve meetinstrumenten voor de ouderenzorg - Een practice based benadering. Universitair netwerk ouderenzorg UNO-VUmc. Amsterdam: VU medisch centrum; 2012.
    1. Katz S Fau - Ford AB, Ford Ab Fau - Moskowitz RW, Moskowitz Rw Fau - Jackson BA, Jackson Ba Fau - Jaffe MW, Jaffe MW: Studies of illness in the aged. The index of adl: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–919.
    1. O’Connell B, Hawkins M, Ostaszkiewicz J, Millar L. Carers’ perspectives of respite care in Australia: an evaluative study. Contemp Nurse. 2012;41:111–119. doi: 10.5172/conu.2012.41.1.111.
    1. Drummond MF, Schulpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for economic evaluation of helath care programmes. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. KCE . Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluations in Belgium. Brussels: Federaal Kenniscentrum voor Gezondheidszorg; 2008.
    1. Baeyens JP, Herkes G, Vandermaesbrugge S. De fluwelen mantel van baluchon alzheimer. Brussel: Baluchon Alzheimer Vlaanderen vzw; 2013.
    1. Annemans L. Health economics for non-economists. 2. Gent: Academia Press; 2008.
    1. van den Berg B, Brouwer WB, Koopmanschap MA. Economic valuation of informal care. An overview of methods and applications. Eur J Health Econ. 2004;5:36–45. doi: 10.1007/s10198-003-0189-y.
    1. Koopmanschap MA, van Exel JN, van den Berg B, Brouwer WB. An overview of methods and applications to value informal care in economic evaluations of healthcare. Pharmacoecon. 2008;26:269–280. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826040-00001.
    1. Neubauer S, Holle R, Menn P, Grossfeld-Schmitz M, Graesel E. Measurement of informal care time in a study of patients with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20:1160–1176. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007564.
    1. Klose T. The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy. 1999;47:97–123. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00010-X.
    1. Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004;24:89–124. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00138-0.
    1. Berger L, Bingefors K, Hedblom E, Pashos C, Torrance G, Smith M. Health care cost, quality, and outcomes. USA: International Society for Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research; 2003.
    1. D’Agostino RB., Jr Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–2281. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>;2-B.
    1. Esposito D, Migliaccio K, Molsen E. Reliability and validity of data sources for outcomes research & diseases and health management programs. USA: International Society for Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research; 2013.
    1. Goel MK, Khanna P, Kishore J. Understanding survival analysis: kaplan-meier estimate. Int J Ayurveda Res. 2010;1:274–278. doi: 10.4103/0974-7788.76794.
    1. Greenwood N, Habibi R, Mackenzie A. Respite: carers’ experiences and perceptions of respite at home. BMC Geriatr. 2012;12:42–54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-42.
    1. Stockwell-Smith G, Kellett U, Moyle W. Why carers of frail older people are not using available respite services: an Australian study. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:2057–2064. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03139.x.
    1. Gaugler JE, Fau YF, Krichbaum K, Wyman JF KKF, Wyman JF. Predictors of nursing home admission for persons with dementia. Med Care. 2009;47:191–198. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818457ce.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe