Increasing engagement with, and effectiveness of, an online CBT-based stress management intervention for employees through the use of an online facilitated bulletin board: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Stephany Carolan, Peter R Harris, Kathryn Greenwood, Kate Cavanagh, Stephany Carolan, Peter R Harris, Kathryn Greenwood, Kate Cavanagh

Abstract

Background: The evidence for the benefits of online cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT)-based programmes delivered in a clinical context is clear, but this evidence does not translate to online CBT-based stress management programmes delivered within a workplace context. One of the challenges to the delivery of online interventions is programme engagement; this challenge is even more acute for interventions delivered in real-world settings such as the workplace. The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the effect of an online facilitated discussion group on engagement, and to estimate the potential effectiveness of an online CBT-based stress management programme.

Methods: This study is a three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing a minimally guided, online, CBT-based stress management intervention delivered with and without an online facilitated bulletin board, and a wait list control group. Up to 90 employees from six UK-based organisations will be recruited to the study. Inclusion criteria will include age 18 years or over, elevated levels of stress (as measured on the PSS-10 scale), access to a computer or a tablet and the Internet. The primary outcome measure will be engagement, as defined by the number of logins to the site; secondary outcome measures will include further measures of engagement (the number of pages visited, the number of modules completed and self-report engagement) and measures of effectiveness (psychological distress and subjective wellbeing). Possible moderators will include measures of intervention quality (satisfaction, acceptability, credibility, system usability), time pressure, goal conflict, levels of distress at baseline and job autonomy. Measures will be taken at baseline, 2 weeks (credibility and expectancy measures only), 8 weeks (completion of intervention) and 16 weeks (follow-up). Primary analysis will be conducted on intention-to-treat principles.

Discussion: To our knowledge this is the first study to explore the effect of an online discussion group on the engagement and effectiveness of an online CBT-based stress management intervention. This study could provide a solution to the growing problem of poor employee psychological health and begin to address the challenge of increasing engagement with Internet-delivered health interventions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02729987 . Registered on 18 Mar 2016.

Keywords: CBT; Internet; Online; Stress; Work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart

References

    1. McManus S, Meltzer H, Brugha T, Beddington P, Jenkins R. Adult psychiatric morbidity in England, 2007: results of a household study. The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care; 2009. .
    1. Davies SC. Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2013, Public Mental Health Priorities: Investing in the Evidence. London: Department of Health; 2014.
    1. ONS. Internet Access – Households and Individuals 2013. Office for National Statistics. 2013. Retrieved from . Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
    1. Tustin N. The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. J Health Commun. 2010;15(1):3–17. doi: 10.1080/10810730903465491.
    1. Strecher V. Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth) Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3(1):53–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091428.
    1. NICE Guidelines [CG 90] Depression in adults: recognition and management. 2009.
    1. NICE Guidelines [CG113] Generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults: management. 2011.
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):196–205. doi: 10.1080/16506070903318960.
    1. Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013196.
    1. Culjpers P, Marks IM, van Straten A, Cavanagh K, Gega L, Andersson G. Computer‐aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta‐analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(2):66–82. doi: 10.1080/16506070802694776.
    1. Richards D, Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32(4):329–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004.
    1. Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklícek I, Riper H. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2007;37:319–28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008944.
    1. Geraedts AS, Kleiboer AM, Twisk J, Wiezer NM, van Mechelen W, Cuijpers P. Long-term results of a web-based guided self-help intervention for employees with depressive symptoms: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(7):e168. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3539.
    1. Grime PR. Computerized cognitive behavioural therapy at work: a randomized controlled trial in employees with recent stress related absenteeism. Occup Med. 2004;54:353–9. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh077.
    1. Philips R, Schneider J, Molosankwe I, Leese M, Foroushani PS, Grime P, Thornicroft G. Randomized controlled trial of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy for depressive symptoms: effectiveness and costs of a workplace intervention. Psychol Med. 2014;44(4):741–52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001323.
    1. Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e152. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2104.
    1. Cavanagh K, Millings A. (Inter)personal Computing: The role of the therapeutic relationship in E-mental health. J Contemp Psychother. 2013;43(4):197–206. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9242-z.
    1. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1) doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11.
    1. Kohl LF, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2665.
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Korten AE, Brittliffe K, Groves C. A comparison of changes in anxiety and depression symptoms of spontaneous users and trial participants of a cognitive behavior therapy website. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e46.
    1. Gilbody S, Littlewood E, Hewitt C, Brierley G, Tharmanathan P, Barkham M, et al. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h5627. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5627.
    1. Farvolden P, Denisoff E, Selby P, Bagby RM, Rudy L. Usage and longitudinal effectiveness of a web-based self-help cognitive behavioral therapy program for panic disorder. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1) doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e7.
    1. Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, Oenema A. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to Internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1639.
    1. Hilvert-Bruce Z, Rossouw PJ, Wong N, Sunderland M, Andrews G. Adherence as a determinant of effectiveness of Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depressive disorders. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(7–8):463–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.001.
    1. Mohr DC, Cuijpers P, Lehman K. Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1602.
    1. Palmqvist B, Carlbring P, Andersson G. Internet-delivered treatments with or without therapist input: does the therapist factor have implications for efficacy and cost? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2007;7(3):291–7. doi: 10.1586/14737167.7.3.291.
    1. Titov N, Andrews G, Choi I, Schwencke G, Mahoney A. Shyness 3: randomized controlled trial of guided versus unguided Internet-based CBT for social phobia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008;42(12):1030–40. doi: 10.1080/00048670802512107.
    1. Andersson G, Bergstrom J, Hollandare F, Carlbring P, Kaldo V, Ekselius L. Internet-based self-help for depression: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187(5):456–61. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.5.456.
    1. Berger T, Caspar F, Richardson R, Kneubuhler B, Sutter D, Andersson G. Internet-based treatment of social phobia: a randomized controlled trial comparing unguided with two types of guided self-help. Behav Res Ther. 2011;49(3):158–69. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.007.
    1. El Alaoui S, Ljótsson B, Hedman E, Kaldo V, Andersson E, Rück C, Lindefors N. Predictors of symptomatic change and adherence in Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for social anxiety disorder in routine psychiatric care. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124258.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340(mar23 1):c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
    1. Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104.
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96. doi: 10.2307/2136404.
    1. Lyubomirsky S, Lepper H. A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc Indic Res. 1999;46:137–55. doi: 10.1023/A:1006824100041.
    1. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194–200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972.
    1. Cohen S, Williamson GM. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S, editors. The social psychology of health. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988. p. 1988.
    1. Eun-Hyun L. Review of the psychometric evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale. Asian Nurs Res. 2012;6(4):121–7. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004.
    1. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.
    1. Warr P. The measurement of wellbeing and other aspects of mental health. J Occup Psychol. 1990;63:193–210. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00521.x.
    1. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44(Pt 2):227–39. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657.
    1. Page AC, Hooke GR, Morrison DL. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in depressed clinical samples. Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46(pt3):283–97. doi: 10.1348/014466506X158996.
    1. Warr P, Bindl UK, Parker SK, Inceoglu I. Four-quadrant investigation of job-related affects and behaviours. Eur J Work Organ Psy. 2014;23(3):342–63. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.744449.
    1. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197–207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6.
    1. Schneider J, Bennett K, Bennett A, Grime P, Grove B, Sarrami Foroushani P, Walker P. Computerised CBT for common mental disorders: RCT of a workplace intervention, Report to British Occupational Health Research Foundation. 2012. p. 1–47.
    1. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000;31(2):73–86. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7916(00)00012-4.
    1. Chang T, Yeh CJ, Krumboltz JD. Process and outcome evaluation of an on-line support group for Asian American male college students. J Couns Psychol. 2001;48(3):319–29. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.319.
    1. Brooke J. SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL, editors. Usability evaluation in industry. London: Taylor & Francis; 1996. pp. 189–94.
    1. Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–94. doi: 10.1080/10447310802205776.
    1. Etkin J, Evangelidis I, Aaker J. Pressed for time? Goal conflict shapes how time is perceived, spent, and valued. J Market Res. 2015;52(3):394–406. doi: 10.1509/jmr.14.0130.
    1. Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(6):1321–39. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.
    1. Rozental A, Andersson G, Boettcher J, Ebert DD, Cuijpers P, Knaevelsrud C, Carlbring P. Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions. Internet Interventions. 2014;1(1):12–9. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.02.001.
    1. Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicorft G, Brewin C, Wing J, editors. Measuring mental health needs. 1. London: Gaskell/Royal College of Psychiatrists; 1992. pp. 163–83.
    1. Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, Brewin C, Wing J, editors. Measuring Mental Health Needs. 2. London: Gaskell/Royal College of Psychiatrists; 1999.
    1. Tan L, Wang M-J, Modini M, Joyce S, Mykletun A, Christensen H, Harvey SB. Preventing the development of depression at work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of universal interventions in the workplace. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):74. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-74.
    1. Blonk R, Houtman I, Brenninkmeijer V, Lagerveld SE. Return to work: a comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed. Work Stress. 2006;20(2):129–44. doi: 10.1080/02678370600856615.
    1. van der Klink J, Blonk R, Schene AH, van Dijk FJ. The benefits of interventions for work-related stress. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(2):270–6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.2.270.
    1. Hasson D, Anderberg UM, Theorell T, Arnetz BB. Psychophysiological effects of a web-based stress management system: a prospective, randomized controlled intervention study of IT and media workers [ISRCTN54254861] BMC Public Health. 2005;5:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-78.
    1. Rose RD. Self-guided multimedia stress management and resilience training. J Posit Psychol. 2014;9(6):489–93. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.927907.
    1. Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(4):336–45. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.007.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe