Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery

J A F Zupancic, H Kirpalani, J Barrett, S Stewart, A Gafni, D Streiner, M L Beecroft, P Smith, J A F Zupancic, H Kirpalani, J Barrett, S Stewart, A Gafni, D Streiner, M L Beecroft, P Smith

Abstract

Objective: To examine the counselling of women admitted to hospital in preterm labour. Such women and their partners are often asked to participate in difficult decisions including mode of delivery, fetal monitoring, and resuscitation.

Study design: Questionnaire based descriptive study.

Study setting: A tertiary level perinatal referral centre.

Patients: Forty-nine women in preterm labour at 22-30 weeks gestation, admitted in two separate periods between March 1997 and May 1999. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME MEASURE: Within 24 hours of counselling, parents were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing recall of the management plan, desire for involvement in decision making, anxiety, and feelings of control over their health. A parallel questionnaire was completed by the clinicians.

Results: Parents and clinicians on recall agreed well about obstetric issues but poorly about neonatal issues. Overall 27% of parents felt: "I would prefer to have the doctors advise me, rather than asking me to decide". In 79% of cases, clinicians believed parents preferred advice rather than to make decisions, but in 45% of these, they misidentified those who wished to make their decisions. Anxiety levels for one third of the mothers were high, and associated with poorer concordance of recall between parents and clinicians.

Conclusions: Serious deficiencies exist in parent-clinician encounters during extremely preterm labour. Concordance between parents and clinicians is poor and anxiety very high. A quarter of parents appear to prefer to relinquish decision making autonomy, but clinicians cannot correctly identify this subgroup. Standardised counselling in the perinatal period, using formal decision aids, should be investigated.

References

    1. Pediatrics. 1993 Nov;92(5):643-50
    1. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):780-2
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):432-9
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):903-18
    1. J Perinatol. 1995 Nov-Dec;15(6):494-502
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92
    1. Methods Inf Med. 1998 Jun;37(2):201-5
    1. Med Decis Making. 1998 Jul-Sep;18(3):295-303
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999 Sep;81(2):F84-91
    1. Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):112-27
    1. J Perinatol. 1999 Sep;19(6 Pt 1):452-3
    1. BMJ. 2000 Mar 4;320(7235):647
    1. J Pediatr. 2000 Nov;137(5):608-16
    1. J Perinatol. 2000 Dec;20(8 Pt 1):504-8
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 1977 Nov;24(2):69-70
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jun;92(6):832-6
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jul 15;143(6):678-84
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1983 Jun;137(6):551-4
    1. Aust Paediatr J. 1987 Aug;23(4):223-6
    1. Anaesthesia. 1988 Apr;43(4):267-9
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1989 Sep;7(9):1192-200
    1. BMJ. 1990 May 26;300(6736):1372-5
    1. Med Care. 1991 Mar;29(3):297-303
    1. Pediatrics. 1991 Jul;88(1):110-4
    1. Pediatrics. 1991 Sep;88(3):512-8
    1. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1991 Jul;8(3):112-21
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):53-8
    1. J Med Ethics. 1992 Jun;18(2):86-93
    1. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994 Apr;22(2):139-41

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe