A prospective real-world analysis of erenumab in refractory chronic migraine

Giorgio Lambru, Bethany Hill, Madeleine Murphy, Ivona Tylova, Anna P Andreou, Giorgio Lambru, Bethany Hill, Madeleine Murphy, Ivona Tylova, Anna P Andreou

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials have shown the safety and clinical superiority of erenumab compared to placebo in chronic migraine (CM). The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of erenumab in a real-world setting in patients with refractory CM.

Methods: This is a prospective single centre real-world audit conducted in patients with CM with and without medication overuse, refractory to established preventive medications, who received monthly erenumab for 6 months.

Results: Of 164 patients treated, 162 patients (female = 135, mean age 46 ± 14.3 years old) were included in the audit. Patients had failed a mean of 8.4 preventive treatments at baseline and 91% of patients failed Botulinum toxin type A at baseline. The mean reduction in monthly migraine days was 6.0 days at month 3 (P = 0.002) and 7.5 days at month 6 (P < 0.001) compared to baseline. The mean reduction in monthly headache days was 6.3 days (P < 0.001) at month 3 and 6.8 days (P < 0.001) at month 6. At month 3, 49%, 35% and 13% and at month 6, 60%, 38% and 22% of patients obtained at least a 30%, 50% and 75% reduction in migraine days, respectively. The percentage of patients with medication overuse was reduced from 54% at baseline to 20% at month 3 and to 25% at month 6. Compared to baseline, the mean reduction of Headache Impact Test-6 score was 7.7 points at month 3 (from 67.6 ± 0.4 to 59.9 ± 0.9) (P < 0.001) and of 7.5 points at month 6 (60.1 ± 1.3) (P = 0.01). The percentage of patients with severe headache-related disability (HIT-6: 60-78) was reduced from 96% at baseline to 68% after three monthly treatments and to 59% after six treatments. At least one side effect was reported by 48% of patients at month 1, 22% at month 3 and 15% at month 6. Constipation (20%) and cold/flu-like symptoms (15%) were the most frequent adverse events reported.

Conclusion: Erenumab may be an effective and well tolerated therapy for medically refractory CM patients with and without medication overuse.

Keywords: CGRP; Chronic migraine; Erenumab; Monoclonal antibodies; Refractory migraine.

Conflict of interest statement

G.L. has received speaker honoraria, funding for travel and has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards sponsored by Allergan, Novartis, Eli Lilly and TEVA. He has received speaker honoraria, funding for travel from electroCore, Nevro Corp. and Autonomic Technologies. B.H. reports no disclosure. M.M. reports no disclosure. I.T. reports no disclosure. A.P.A received speaker honoraria and funding for travel from Allergan, Eli Lilly and eNeura, honoraria for participation in advisory boards sponsored by Allergan and Eli Lilly, sponsorship for educational purposes from eNeura, Allergan, Autonomic Technologies and Novartis, and an equipment grant from eNeura.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Audit design: Chronic migraine patients who failed at least 3 preventive treatments, with or without medication overused, were offered monthly subcutaneous injections of erenumab at 70 mg for 3 months. At the three-month time point, patients who achieved at least a 50% reduction in migraine days, were offered the option to continue their treatment with monthly injections of erenumab at 70 mg. Patients who achieved less than 50% reduction in their migraine days, were offered the option to receive monthly injections of erenumab at 140 mg for the next three consecutive months. Any patient who achieved less than 30% reduction in their migraine days at the six-month time point discontinued the erenumab treatment, while patients who achieved at least 30% reduction in their migraine days continue the erenumab treatment at 140 mg
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Six-month outcomes on all patients treated with erenumab: Overall, during the entire six month observation period post-erenumab treatment initiation, monthly migraine days (MMD), headache days (MHD), days of abortive use and headache impact test (HIT-6) were significantly reduced compared to baseline (mean ± st. er.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Monthly responders rates: Percentage of patients who achieved at least a 30%, 50% or 75% reduction in monthly migraine days per month, post-erenumab treatment initiation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage of chronic and episodic migraine patients: Percentage of patients who converted into an episodic migraine pattern (

References

    1. Natoli JL, Manack A, Dean B, et al. Global prevalence of chronic migraine: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:599–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01941.x.
    1. Manack AN, Buse DC, Lipton RB (2011) Chronic migraine: epidemiology and disease burden. Curr pain headache rep 15:70– 78. 10.1007/s11916-010-0157-z
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–349. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21.
    1. Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Gillard P, Hansen RN, Devine EB. Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2015;35:478–488. doi: 10.1177/0333102414547138.
    1. Martelletti P, Katsarava Z, Lampl C et al. (2014) Refractory chronic migraine: a consensus statement on clinical definition from the European Headache Federation. J Headache Pain ;28;15:47. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-47
    1. Schulman EA, Lake AE, 3rd, Goadsby PJ, et al. Defining refractory migraine and refractory chronic migraine: proposed criteria from the refractory headache special interest section of the American headache society. Headache. 2008;48:778–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01132.x.
    1. Simona Sacco, Mark Braschinsky, Anne Ducros, Christian Lampl, Patrick Little, Antoinette Maassen van den Brink et al (2020) European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine. J Headache Pain
    1. Bloudek LM, Stokes M, Buse DC et al (2012) Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: results from the international burden of migraine study (IBMS). J headache pain; 13: 361–378. 14. 10.1007/s10194-012-0460-7
    1. Irimia P, Palma JA, Fernandez-Torron R, et al. Refractory migraine in a headache clinic population. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-94.
    1. Markham A. Erenumab: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2018;78:1157–1161. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0944-0.
    1. Hoy SM. Fremanezumab: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2018;78:1829–1834. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1004-5.
    1. Lamb YN. Galcanezumab: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2018;78:1769–1775. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1002-7.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1):1–211.
    1. NICE Technology appraisal guidance. Botulinum toxin type A for the prevention of headaches in adults with chronic migraine
    1. Howell D. Statistical methods for psychology (6th ed) CA. Thomson Wadsworth: Belmont; 2007.
    1. Tabachnick BG, Fidel LS. Using multivariant statistics. 5. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2007.
    1. Ornello R, Casalena A, Frattale I, Gabriele A, Affaitati G, Giamberardino MA, et al. Real-life data on the efficacy and safety of erenumab in the Abruzzo region, Central Italy. J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01102-9.
    1. Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Doležil D, Silberstein S et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 16(6):425–434.
    1. Ashina M, Tepper S, Brandes JL, et al. Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1611–1621. doi: 10.1177/0333102418788347.
    1. Tepper SJ, Ashina M, Reuter U et al (2020) Long-term safety and efficacy of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine: results from a 52-week, open-label extension study. Cephalalgia 26. 10.1177/0333102420912726
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2009;2009.146(3):238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.pain..08.019.
    1. Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(5):484–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01555.x.
    1. Tepper SJ, Diener HC, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Friedman DI, Reuter U et al (2019) Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Neurology. 92(20):e2309–e2e20. https://doi. Org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007497
    1. Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F et al (2017) A controlled trial of Erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med 377(22):2123–2132.
    1. Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Lanteri-Minet M, Osipova V et al (2018) ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 38(6):1026–1037. 0333102418759786
    1. Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD et al (2018) Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 392(10161):2280–2287.
    1. Kudrow D, Pascual J, Winner PK et al (2020) Vascular safety of erenumab for migraine prevention. Neurology;4;94(5):e497-e510. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008743
    1. Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, Reuter U, Terwindt G, Mitsikostas DD et al (2019) European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J headache pain;20(1):6. 10.1186/s10194-018-0955-y
    1. Tiseo C, Ornello R, Pistoia F, Sacco S. How to integrate monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor in daily clinical practice. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1000-5.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe