Pain management in the emergency department and its relationship to patient satisfaction

La Vonne A Downey, Leslie S Zun, La Vonne A Downey, Leslie S Zun

Abstract

Background: Pain is the most common reason due to which patients come to the emergency department (ED).

Aim: The purpose of this study was to measure the correlation, if any, between pain reduction and the level of satisfaction in patients who presented to the ED with pain as their chief complaint.

Materials and methods: This study used a randomly selected group of patients who presented to the ED with pain of 4 or more on the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) as their chief complaint to a level one adult and pediatric trauma center. Instruments that were used in this study were the VAS, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS). They were administered to patients by research fellows in the treatment rooms. Statistical analysis included frequencies, descriptive, and linear regression. This study was approved by the Internal Review Board.

Results: A total of 159 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients were given some type of treatment for their pain upon arrival to the ED. A logistic regression showed a significant relationship to reduction in pain by 40% or more and customer service questions.

Conclusions: A reduction in perceived pain levels does directly relate to several indicators of customer service. Patients who experienced pain relief during their stay in the ED had significant increases in distress relief, rapport with their doctor, and intent to comply with given instructions.

Keywords: Emergency medicine; customer service; pain management.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Tanabe P, Buschmann M. A prospective study of ED pain management practices and the patients prospective. J Emerg Nurs. 1999;25:171–7.
    1. Garbez RO, Chan GK, Neighbor M, Puntillo K. Pain after discharge: A pilot study of factors associated with pain management and functional status. J Emerg Nurs. 2006;32:288–93.
    1. Dillard J, Knapp S. Complementary and Alternative Pain Therapy in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2005;23:529–49.
    1. Todd KH, Ducharme J, Choiniere M, Crandall CS, Fosnocht DE, Homel P, et al. Pain in the emergency department: results of the pain and emergency medicine initiative (PEMI) multicenter study. J Pain. 2007;8:460–6.
    1. Muntlin A, Gunningberg L, Carlsson M. Patient’s perception of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement. J Clin Nurs. 2006;16:223–32.
    1. Baker R. Development of a questionnaire to assess patients’ satisfaction with consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40:487–90.
    1. Ford R, Bach S, Fottler M. Methods of Measuring Patient Satisfaction in Health Care Organization. Hlth Care Manag Review. 1997;22:74–89.
    1. Dougherty C. Customer Service in the Emergency Department. Topics in Emergency Medicine. Adv Emerg Nurs. 2005;27:265–72.
    1. Garman A, Garcia J, Hargreaves M. Qual Health Care. 2004;13:75–80.
    1. Guru V, Dubinsky I. The Patient VS. Caregiver Perception of Acute Pain in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2000;18:7–12.
    1. Matheson LJ, Melhorn M, Mayer T. Reliability of a Visual Analog Version of the QuickDASH. J Bone and Joint Surg. 2006;88:1782–7.
    1. Meakin R, Weinman J. The Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale. Fam Prac J. 2002;19:257–64.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe