Triple-site rTMS for the treatment of chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled trial
Astrid Lehner, Martin Schecklmann, Mark W Greenlee, Rainer Rupprecht, Berthold Langguth, Astrid Lehner, Martin Schecklmann, Mark W Greenlee, Rainer Rupprecht, Berthold Langguth
Abstract
Recent research indicates that tinnitus is related to alterations of neural networks including temporal, parietal, and prefrontal brain regions. The current study examines a rTMS protocol which targets three central nodes of these networks in a two-arm randomized parallel group trial. Overall, 49 patients with chronic tinnitus were randomized to receive either triple-site stimulation (left dorsolateral prefrontal stimulation, 1000 pulses, 20 Hz plus left and right temporoparietal stimulation, 1000 pulses each, 1 Hz) or single-site stimulation (left temporoparietal stimulation, 3000 pulses, 1 Hz). Both groups were treated in ten sessions. Tinnitus severity as measured by the tinnitus questionnaire was assessed before rTMS (day1), after rTMS (day12) and at two follow-up visits (day 90 and day 180). The triple-site protocol was well tolerated. There was a significant reduction in tinnitus severity for both treatment groups. The triple-site group tended to show a more pronounced treatment effect at day 90. However, the measurement time point x group interaction effect was not significant. The current results confirm former studies that indicated a significant reduction of tinnitus severity after rTMS treatment. No significant superiority of the multisite protocol was observed. Future approaches for the enhancement of treatment effects are discussed.
Figures
References
- Hoffman H. J. & Reed G. W. In Tinnitus: Theory and Management (ed Snow J. B. ) 16–41 (BC Decker Inc, 2004).
- Langguth B. A review of tinnitus symptoms beyond ‘ringing in the ears’: a call to action. Curr Med Res Opin 27, 1635–1643 (2011).
- Eggermont J. J. & Roberts L. E. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci 27, 676–682 (2004).
- Lanting C. P., de Kleine E. & van Dijk P. Neural activity underlying tinnitus generation: results from PET and fMRI. Hear Res 255, 1–13 (2009).
- Adjamian P., Sereda M. & Hall D. A. The mechanisms of tinnitus: perspectives from human functional neuroimaging. Hear Res 253, 15–31 (2009).
- De Ridder D., Elgoyhen A. B., Romo R. & Langguth B. Phantom percepts: tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 8075–8080 (2011).
- Schlee W., Hartmann T., Langguth B. & Weisz N. Abnormal resting-state cortical coupling in chronic tinnitus. BMC Neurosci 10, 11 (2009).
- Maudoux A. et al. Auditory resting-state network connectivity in tinnitus: a functional MRI study. PLoS One 7, e36222 (2012).
- Schmidt S. A., Akrofi K., Carpenter-Thompson J. R. & Husain F. T. Default mode, dorsal attention and auditory resting state networks exhibit differential functional connectivity in tinnitus and hearing loss. PLoS One 8, e76488 (2013).
- van der Loo E. et al. Tinnitus intensity dependent gamma oscillations of the contralateral auditory cortex. PLoS One 4, e7396 (2009).
- Vanneste S., Congedo M. & De Ridder D. Pinpointing a highly specific pathological functional connection that turns phantom sound into distress. Cereb Cortex 24, 2268–2282 (2014).
- Vanneste S. et al. The neural correlates of tinnitus-related distress. Neuroimage 52, 470–480 (2010).
- Lefaucheur J. P. et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 125, 2150–2206 (2014).
- Chen J. J. et al. Bilateral vs. unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychiatry Res 219, 51–57 (2014).
- Kleinjung T. et al. Combined temporal and prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for tinnitus treatment: a pilot study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138, 497–501 (2008).
- Langguth B. et al. Efficacy of different protocols of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of tinnitus: Pooled analysis of two randomized controlled studies. World J Biol Psychiatry 15, 276–285 (2014).
- Lehner A. et al. Multisite rTMS for the treatment of chronic tinnitus: stimulation of the cortical tinnitus network--a pilot study. Brain Topogr 26, 501–510 (2013).
- Lehner A. et al. Comparing single-site with multisite rTMS for the treatment of chronic tinnitus - clinical effects and neuroscientific insights: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 14, 269 (2013).
- Lehner A. et al. Erratum to: comparing single-site with multisite rTMS for the treatment of chronic tinnitus - clinical effects and neuroscientific insights: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 15, 1–1 (2014).
- Newman C. W., Jacobson G. P. & Spitzer J. B. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122, 143–148 (1996).
- Langguth B. et al. Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006. Prog Brain Res 166, 525–536 (2007).
- Goebel G. & Hiller W. [The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire]. HNO 42, 166–172 (1994).
- Nelting M. & Finlayson N. K. Geräuschüberempfindlichkeits-Fragebogen (GÜF). (Hogrefe, 2004).
- Hoffman R. E. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of left temporoparietal cortex in three patients reporting hallucinated “voices”. Biol Psychiatry 46, 130–132 (1999).
- Jasper H. H. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 10, 371–375 (1958).
- Duecker F. & Sack A. T. Rethinking the role of sham TMS. Front Psychol 6, 210 (2015).
- Adamchic I. et al. Linking the Tinnitus Questionnaire and the subjective Clinical Global Impression: Which differences are clinically important? Health Qual Life Outcomes 10, 79 (2012).
- De Ridder D. et al. An integrative model of auditory phantom perception: tinnitus as a unified percept of interacting separable subnetworks. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 44, 16–32 (2014).
- Gershon A. A., Dannon P. N. & Grunhaus L. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. Am J Psychiatry 160, 835–845 (2003).
- Plewnia C. et al. Dose-dependent attenuation of auditory phantom perception (tinnitus) by PET-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 28, 238–246 (2007).
- Kreuzer P. M. et al. Can Temporal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation be Enhanced by Targeting Affective Components of Tinnitus with Frontal rTMS? A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Front Syst Neurosci 5, 88 (2011).
- Langguth B. et al. Neuroimaging and neuromodulation: complementary approaches for identifying the neuronal correlates of tinnitus. Front Syst Neurosci 6, 15 (2012).
- Siebner H. R., Hartwigsen G., Kassuba T. & Rothwell J. C. How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition. Cortex 45, 1035–1042 (2009).
- Soleimani R., Jalali M. M. & Hasandokht T. Therapeutic impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol in press (2015).
- Lehner A. et al. Predictors for rTMS response in chronic tinnitus. Front Syst Neurosci 6, 11 (2012).
- George M. S. & Post R. M. Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of medication-resistant depression. Am J Psychiatry 168, 356–364 (2011).
- George M. S., Taylor J. J. & Short E. B. The expanding evidence base for rTMS treatment of depression. Curr Opin Psychiatry 26, 13–18 (2013).
Source: PubMed