Does a preceding hand wash and drying time after surgical hand disinfection influence the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub?

Nils-Olaf Hübner, Günter Kampf, Philipp Kamp, Thomas Kohlmann, Axel Kramer, Nils-Olaf Hübner, Günter Kampf, Philipp Kamp, Thomas Kohlmann, Axel Kramer

Abstract

Background: Recently, a propanol-based hand rub has been described to exceed the efficacy requirements of the European standard EN 12791 in only 1.5 min significantly. But the effect of a 1 min preceding hand wash and the effect of one additional minute for evaporation of the alcohol after its application on the efficacy after a 1.5 min application time has never been studied.

Methods: We have investigated a propanol-based hand rub (Sterillium, based on 45% propan-2-ol, 30% propan-1-ol and 0.2% mecetronium etilsulfate) in three variations: with (A) and without (B) a 1 min hand wash before the disinfection of 1.5 min with immediate sampling after the disinfection; and (C) without a hand wash before the disinfection but with sampling 1 min after the disinfection. The efficacy of the three variations was compared to the reference treatment of EN 12791. All experiments were performed in a Latin-square design with 20 volunteers. Pre- and post-values (immediate and after 3 hr) were obtained according to EN 12791.

Results: The 3 min reference disinfection reduced resident hand bacteria on average by 1.8 log10 steps (immediate effect) and 1.4 log10-steps (sustained effect) respectively. Method A was equally effective as the reference (immediate efficacy: 1.5 log10-steps; sustained efficacy: 1.6 log10-steps). Method B seemed to be more effective (immediate efficacy: 2.3 log10-steps; sustained efficacy: 1.7 log10-steps). Method C revealed the best efficacy (immediate efficacy: 2.3 log10-steps; sustained efficacy: 2.0 log10-steps). A comparison of all three treatment variations and the reference treatment revealed a significant difference for the immediate efficacy (p = 0.026; Friedman test), but not for the sustained efficacy (p = 0.430). A post-hoc-test for the immediate efficacy indicated a significant difference between methods A and C (p < 0.05; Wilcoxon-Wilcox test). Hence, none of the treatment variations was significantly less effective than the reference treatment.

Conclusion: An application of the propanol-based hand rub for 1.5 min after 1 min hand wash fulfills the efficacy requirements of EN 12791. The efficacy can be improved to some extent by omitting the preceding hand wash and by awaiting the evaporation of the alcohol which is clinical practice anyway. The preceding hand wash has the most negative effect on the immediate effect. Based on our data hands should not be routinely washed before the disinfection period unless there is a good reason for it such as visible soiling.

References

    1. Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand hygiene task force. MMWR - Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. 2002;51:1–45.
    1. Anonymous Händehygiene. Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 2000;43:230–233.
    1. Kampf G, Goroncy-Bermes P, Fraise A, Rotter M. Terminology in surgical hand disinfection - a new tower of Babel in infection control. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2005;59:269–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.020.
    1. Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2004;17:863–893. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004.
    1. Parienti JJ, Thibon P, Heller R, Le Roux Y, von Theobald P, Bensadoun H, Bouvet A, Lemarchand F, Le Coutour X. Hand-rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing and 30-day surgical site infection rates - a randomized equivalence study. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;288:722–727. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.6.722.
    1. Kampf G, Ostermeyer C, Heeg P. Surgical hand disinfection with a propanol-based hand rub: equivalence of shorter application times. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2005;58:304–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.022.
    1. Kampf G, Ostermeyer C, Heeg P, Paulson D. Evaluation of two methods of determining the efficacies of two alcohol-based hand rubs for surgical hand antisepsis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72:3856–3861. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02746-05.
    1. Hübner NO, Kampf G, Löffler H, Kramer A. Effect of a 1 minute hand wash on the bactericidal efficacy of consecutive surgical hand disinfection with standard alcohols and on skin hydration. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2006;209:285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.01.002.
    1. EN 12791:2005 . Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Surgical hand disinfection. Test method and requirement (phase 2, step 2) Brussels, CEN - Comité Européen de Normalisation; 2005.
    1. Pitten FA, Herdemann G, Kramer A. The integrity of latex gloves in clinical dental practice. Infection. 2000;28:388–392. doi: 10.1007/s150100070011.
    1. Kampf G, Meyer B, Goroncy-Bermes P. Comparison of two test methods for the determination of sufficient antimicrobial efficacy of three different alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2003;55:220–225. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(03)00255-X.
    1. Labadie JC, Kampf G, Lejeune B, Exner M, Cottron O, Girard R, Orlick M, Goetz ML, Darbord JC, Kramer A. Recommendation for surgical hand disinfection - requirements, implementation and need for research. A proposal by representatives of the SFHH, DGHM and DGKH for a European discussion. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2002;51:312–315. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1243.
    1. Rehork B, Rüden H. Investigations into the efficacy of different procedures for surgical hand disinfection between consecutive operations. Journal of Hospital Infection. 1991;19:115–127. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90104-G.
    1. Heeg P, Ulmer R, Schwenzer N. Verbessern Händewaschen und Verwendung der Handbürste das Ergebnis der Chirurgischen Händedesinfektion? Hygiene + Medizin. 1988;13:270–272.
    1. Rotter M, Koller W. Effekt der sequentiellen Anwendung von Chlorhexidinseife und einer alkoholischen CHX-Präparation versus Flüssigseife und einer solchen Präparation bei der Chirurgischen Händedesinfektion. Hygiene + Medizin. 1990;15:437–440.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe