Assessment of Physician Priorities in Delivery of Preventive Care

Jessica J Zhang, Michael B Rothberg, Anita D Misra-Hebert, Niyati M Gupta, Glen B Taksler, Jessica J Zhang, Michael B Rothberg, Anita D Misra-Hebert, Niyati M Gupta, Glen B Taksler

Abstract

Importance: Primary care physicians have limited time to discuss preventive care, but it is unknown how they prioritize recommended services.

Objective: To understand primary care physicians' prioritization of preventive services.

Design, setting, and participants: This online survey was administered to primary care physicians in a large health care system from March 17 to May 12, 2017. Physicians were asked whether they prioritize preventive services and which factors contribute to their choice (5-point Likert scale). Results were analyzed from July 8, 2017, to September 19, 2019.

Exposures: A 2 × 2 factorial design of 2 hypothetical patients: (1) a 50-year-old white woman with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of breast cancer; and (2) a 45-year-old black man with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of colorectal cancer. Two visit lengths (40 minutes vs 20 minutes) were given. Each patient was eligible for at least 11 preventive services.

Main outcomes and measures: Physicians rated their likelihood of discussing each service during the visit and reported their top 3 priorities for patients 1 and 2. Physician choices were compared with the preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy, using a previously published mathematical model.

Results: Of 241 physicians, 137 responded (57%), of whom 74 (54%) were female and 85 (62%) were younger than 50 years. Physicians agreed they prioritized preventive services (mean score, 4.27 [95% CI, 4.12-4.42] of 5.00), mostly by ability to improve quality (4.56 [95% CI, 4.44-4.68] of 5.00) or length (4.53 [95% CI, 4.40-4.66] of 5.00) of life. Physicians reported more prioritization in the 20- vs 40-minute visit, indicating that they were likely to discuss fewer services during the shorter visit (median, 5 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-8] vs 11 [IQR, 9-13] preventive services for patient 1, and 4 [IQR, 3-6] vs 9 [IQR, 8-11] for patient 2). Physicians reported similar top 3 priorities for both patients: smoking cessation, hypertension control, and glycemic control for patient 1 and smoking cessation, hypertension control, and colorectal cancer screening for patient 2. Physicians' top 3 priorities did not usually include diet and exercise or weight loss (ranked in their top 3 recommendations for either patient by only 48 physicians [35%]), although these were among the 3 preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy based on the mathematical model.

Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study, physicians prioritized preventive services under time constraints, but priorities did not vary across patients. Physicians did not prioritize lifestyle interventions despite large potential benefits. Future research should consider whether physicians and patients would benefit from guidance on preventive care priorities.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Rothberg reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging (NIA) during the conduct of the study. Dr Misra-Hebert reported receiving grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Novo Nordisk A/S, Boehringer Ingelheim and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute outside the submitted work. Dr Taksler reported receiving grants from the NIA and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (administered by Clinical & Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland) during the conduct of the study and personal fees from the University of Michigan for consulting on a grant funded by the AHRQ, outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Top 3 Preventive Recommendations to…
Figure 1.. Top 3 Preventive Recommendations to Address in the Current Visit
Recommendations were chosen by more than 5% of physicians.
Figure 2.. Net Expected Effect of Each…
Figure 2.. Net Expected Effect of Each Preventive Recommendation on Life Expectancy Based on Prior Literature

References

    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. USPSTF A and B Recommendations . February 2019. Accessed April 26, 2019.
    1. Marshall IJ, Wolfe CDA, McKevitt C. Lay perspectives on hypertension and drug adherence: systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ. 2012;345:e3953. doi:10.1136/bmj.e3953
    1. Aung E, Donald M, Coll J, Dower J, Williams GM, Doi SAR. The impact of concordant and discordant comorbidities on patient-assessed quality of diabetes care. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1621-1632. doi:10.1111/hex.12151
    1. Piette JD, Kerr EA. The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(3):725-731. doi:10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-2078
    1. Kerr EA, Heisler M, Krein SL, et al. . Beyond comorbidity counts: how do comorbidity type and severity influence diabetes patients’ treatment priorities and self-management? J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(12):1635-1640. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0313-2
    1. Pentakota SR, Rajan M, Fincke BG, et al. . Does diabetes care differ by type of chronic comorbidity? an evaluation of the Piette and Kerr framework. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1285-1292. doi:10.2337/dc11-1569
    1. Piette JD, Richardson C, Valenstein M. Addressing the needs of patients with multiple chronic illnesses: the case of diabetes and depression. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(2 pt 2):152-162.
    1. Borsky A, Zhan C, Miller T, Ngo-Metzger Q, Bierman AS, Meyers D. Few Americans receive all high-priority, appropriate clinical preventive services. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(6):925-928. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1248
    1. Yarnall KSH, Østbye T, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Family physicians as team leaders: “time” to share the care. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6(2):A59.
    1. Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635-641. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.4.635
    1. Pollak KI, Krause KM, Yarnall KSH, Gradison M, Michener JL, Østbye T. Estimated time spent on preventive services by primary care physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:245. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-245
    1. Eaton J, Reed D, Angstman KB, et al. . Effect of visit length and a clinical decision support tool on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening rates in a primary care practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(3):593-598. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01625.x
    1. Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, et al. . Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(11):753-760. doi:10.7326/M16-0961
    1. Taksler GB, Keshner M, Fagerlin A, Hajizadeh N, Braithwaite RS. Personalized estimates of benefit from preventive care guidelines: a proof of concept. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(3):161-168. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00005
    1. Owens DK, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD. Prioritizing guideline-recommended interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(3):223-224. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00014
    1. Maciosek MV, LaFrance AB, Dehmer SP, et al. . Updated priorities among effective clinical preventive services. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):14-22. doi:10.1370/afm.2017
    1. Isham G, Sanchez E, Jones WA, Teutsch S, Woolf S, Haddix A. Prevention priorities: guidance for value-driven health improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):6-8. doi:10.1370/afm.2023
    1. O’Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Margolis KL, Kottke TE. Strategies to prioritize clinical options in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(1):10-13. doi:10.1370/afm.2027
    1. The American Association for Public Opinion Research . Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 9th ed. AAPOR; 2016.
    1. Arias E, Xu J. United States life tables, 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(7):1-64.
    1. Bibbins-Domingo K; US Preventive Services Task Force . Aspirin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(12):836-845. doi:10.7326/M16-0577
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force . Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(6):396-404. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-6-200903170-00008
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Prostate cancer: screening recommendations. Published May 8, 2018. Accessed April 26, 2019.
    1. Moyer VA; US Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):120-134. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459
    1. Patnode CD, Evans CV, Senger CA, Redmond N, Lin JS. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without known cardiovascular disease risk factors: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2017;318(2):175-193. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3303
    1. Mandelblatt JS, Clapp JD, Luta G, et al. . Long-term trajectories of self-reported cognitive function in a cohort of older survivors of breast cancer: CALGB 369901 (Alliance). Cancer. 2016;122(22):3555-3563. doi:10.1002/cncr.30208
    1. Association of American Medical Colleges. Data report: active physicians by age and specialty, 2017. Updated December 2017. Accessed May 11, 2020.
    1. Association of American Medical Colleges. Data report: active physicians by sex and specialty, 2017. Updated December 2017. Accessed May 11, 2020.
    1. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. The risk of death by age, sex, and smoking status in the United States: putting health risks in context. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(12):845-853. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn124
    1. Nagykaldi ZJ, Voncken-Brewster V, Aspy CB, Mold JW. Novel computerized health risk appraisal may improve longitudinal health and wellness in primary care: a pilot study. Appl Clin Inform. 2013;4(1):75-87. doi:10.4338/ACI-2012-10-RA-0048
    1. Krist AH, Aycock RA, Etz RS, et al. . MyPreventiveCare: implementation and dissemination of an interactive preventive health record in three practice-based research networks serving disadvantaged patients: a randomized cluster trial. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):181. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0181-1
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: behavioral counseling. Posted August 26, 2014. Accessed May 11, 2020.
    1. Fildes A, Charlton J, Rudisill C, Littlejohns P, Prevost AT, Gulliford MC. Probability of an obese person attaining normal body weight: cohort study using electronic health records. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):e54-e59. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302773
    1. Asch DA, Troxel AB, Stewart WF, et al. . Effect of financial incentives to physicians, patients, or both on lipid levels: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(18):1926-1935. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.14850
    1. Blane DN, Macdonald S, Morrison D, O’Donnell CA. The role of primary care in adult weight management: qualitative interviews with key stakeholders in weight management services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):764. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2729-7
    1. Patel MS, Benjamin EJ, Volpp KG, et al. . Effect of a game-based intervention designed to enhance social incentives to increase physical activity among families: the BE FIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1586-1593. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3458
    1. Chaiton M, Diemert L, Cohen JE, et al. . Estimating the number of quit attempts it takes to quit smoking successfully in a longitudinal cohort of smokers. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e011045. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011045
    1. McNeil JJ, Wolfe R, Woods RL, et al. ; ASPREE Investigator Group . Effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events and bleeding in the healthy elderly. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(16):1509-1518. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1805819
    1. Zheng SL, Roddick AJ. Association of aspirin use for primary prevention with cardiovascular events and bleeding events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019;321(3):277-287. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.20578

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe