Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Clinical Trials

Neal J Meropol, Yu-Ning Wong, Terrance Albrecht, Sharon Manne, Suzanne M Miller, Anne Lederman Flamm, Al Bowen Benson 3rd, Joanne Buzaglo, Michael Collins, Brian Egleston, Linda Fleisher, Michael Katz, Tyler G Kinzy, Tasnuva M Liu, Seunghee Margevicius, Dawn M Miller, David Poole, Nancy Roach, Eric Ross, Mark D Schluchter, Neal J Meropol, Yu-Ning Wong, Terrance Albrecht, Sharon Manne, Suzanne M Miller, Anne Lederman Flamm, Al Bowen Benson 3rd, Joanne Buzaglo, Michael Collins, Brian Egleston, Linda Fleisher, Michael Katz, Tyler G Kinzy, Tasnuva M Liu, Seunghee Margevicius, Dawn M Miller, David Poole, Nancy Roach, Eric Ross, Mark D Schluchter

Abstract

Purpose: Lack of knowledge and negative attitudes have been identified as barriers to participation in clinical trials by patients with cancer. We developed Preparatory Education About Clinical Trials (PRE-ACT), a theory-guided, Web-based, interactive computer program, to deliver tailored video educational content to patients in an effort to overcome barriers to considering clinical trials as a treatment option.

Patients and methods: A prospective, randomized clinical trial compared PRE-ACT with a control condition that provided general clinical trials information produced by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in text format. One thousand two hundred fifty-five patients with cancer were randomly allocated before their initial visit with an oncologist to PRE-ACT (n = 623) or control (n = 632). PRE-ACT had three main components: assessment of clinical trials knowledge and attitudinal barriers, values assessment with clarification back to patients, and provision of a video library tailored to address each patient's barriers. Outcomes included knowledge and attitudes and preparation for decision making about clinical trials.

Results: Both PRE-ACT and control interventions improved knowledge and attitudes (all P < .001) compared with baseline. Patients randomly allocated to PRE-ACT showed a significantly greater increase in knowledge (P < .001) and a significantly greater decrease in attitudinal barriers (P < .001) than did their control (text-only) counterparts. Participants in both arms significantly increased their preparedness to consider clinical trials (P < .001), and there was a trend favoring the PRE-ACT group (P < .09). PRE-ACT was also associated with greater patient satisfaction than was NCI text alone.

Conclusion: These data show that patient education before the first oncologist visit improves knowledge, attitudes, and preparation for decision making about clinical trials. Both text and tailored video were effective. The PRE-ACT interactive video program was more effective than NCI text in improving knowledge and reducing attitudinal barriers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00750009.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.

© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Preparatory Education About Clinical Trials (PRE-ACT) theoretical model.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
CONSORT diagram. PRE-ACT, Preparatory Education About Clinical Trials.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Demographic influences on treatment effect. Means and 95% CIs for demographic influence on treatment effect. Means calculated are post-pre for PRE-ACT minus post-pre for control, for knowledge and preparation. Means for attitudinal barriers are calculated as post-pre for control minus post-pre for PRE-ACT, to allow same direction of differences for all scales. HS, high school; PRE-ACT, Preparatory Education About Clinical Trials.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe