Acceptability and effectiveness of opportunistic referral of smokers to telephone cessation advice from a nurse: a randomised trial in Australian general practice

Jane M Young, Seham Girgis, Tracey A Bruce, Melissa Hobbs, Jeanette E Ward, Jane M Young, Seham Girgis, Tracey A Bruce, Melissa Hobbs, Jeanette E Ward

Abstract

Background: GPs often lack time to provide intensive cessation advice for patients who smoke. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of opportunistic referral of smokers by their GP for telephone cessation counselling by a trained nurse.

Methods: Adult smokers (n = 318) attending 30 GPs in South Western Sydney, Australia were randomly allocated to usual care or referral to a telephone-based program comprising assessment and stage-based behavioural advice, written information and follow-up delivered by a nurse. Self-reported point prevalence abstinence at six and 12 months was compared between groups. Characteristics of patients who accepted and completed the intervention were investigated.

Results: Of 169 smokers randomised to the intervention, 76 (45%) consented to referral. Compared with smokers in 'pre-contemplation', those further along the stage-of-change continuum were significantly more likely to consent (p = 0.003). Those further along the continuum also were significantly more likely to complete all four calls of the intervention (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 0.8-8.1 and OR 8.6, 95% CI: 1.7-44.4 for 'contemplation' and 'preparation' respectively). At six months, there was no significant difference between groups in point prevalence abstinence (intention to treat) (9% versus 8%, p = 0.7). There was no evidence of differential intervention effectiveness by baseline stage-of-change (p = 0.6) or patient sex (p = 0.5). At 12 months, point prevalence abstinence in the intervention and control groups was 8% and 6% respectively (p = 0.6).

Conclusion: Acceptance of opportunistic referral for nurse delivered telephone cessation advice was low. This trial did not demonstrate improved quit rates following the intervention. Future research efforts might better focus support for those patients who are motivated to quit. AUSTRALIAN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: ACTRN012607000091404.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomised trial of opportunistic referral of smokers by GPs to telephone cessation advice from a nurse: CONSORT flowchart.

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia's health 2006. AIHW cat no AUS 73. Canberra: AIHW; 2006.
    1. Stott N, Davis R. The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1979;29:201–215.
    1. Lancaster T, Stead LF. Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004.
    1. Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen SJ, Dorfman SF, Goldstein MG, Gritz ER, Heyman RB, Jaén CR, Kottke TE, Lando HA, Medcklenburg RE, Mullen PD, Nett LM, Robinson L. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; 2000.
    1. Richmond RL. The physician can make a difference with smokers: evidence based clinical approaches. Int J Tub Lung Dis. 1999;3:100–12.
    1. Cumming R, Barton G, Fahey P, Wilson A, Leeder SR. Medical practitioners and health promotion: results from a community survey in Sydney's western suburbs. Comm Hlth Stud. 1989;XIII:294–301.
    1. Young J, Ward JE. Implementing guidelines for smoking cessation advice in Australian general practice: opinions, current practices, readiness-to-change and perceived barriers. Fam Pract. 2001;18:14–20. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.1.14.
    1. Humair J-P, Ward JE. Smoking cessation strategies observed in videotaped general practice consultations. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:71–2. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(97)00010-X.
    1. Coleman T, Wynn A, Barrett S, Wilson A. Discussion of NRT and other antismoking interventions in UK general practitioners' routine consultations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5:163–8. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000073261.
    1. Vogt F, Hall S, Marteau TM. General practitioners' and family physicians' negative beliefs and attitudes towards discussing smoking cessation with patients: a systematic review. Addiction. 2005;100:1423–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01221.x.
    1. Cockburn J, Ruth D, Silagy C, Dobbin M, Reid Y, Scollo M, Naccarella L. Randomised trial of three approaches for marketing smoking cessation programmes to Australian general practitioners. BMJ. 1992;304:691–94.
    1. Richmond R, Mendelsohn C, Kehoe L. Family physicians' utilisation of a brief smoking cessation program following reinforcement contact after training: a randomised trial. Prev Med. 1998;27:77–83. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0240.
    1. Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher RW, Campbell E, Carruthers A, Reid AL, Ireland M. Randomised controlled trial of a computer strategy to increase general practitioner preventive care. Prev Med. 1999;29:478–86. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0567.
    1. Young JM, D'Este C, Ward JE. Improving family physicians' use of evidence-based smoking cessation strategies: a cluster randomization trial. Prev Med. 2002;35:572–83. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1111.
    1. Hollis JF, Lichtenstein E, Vogt T, Stevens V, Biglan A. Nurse-assisted counselling for smokers in primary care. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:521–525.
    1. Hollis JF, Bills R, Whitlock E, Stevens V, Mullooly J, Lichtenstein E. Implementing tobacco interventions in the real world of managed care. Tobacco Control. 2000;9:i18–i24. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_1.i18.
    1. Rice VH, Stead LF. Nursing interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008;23:CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub2.
    1. Miller M, Wood L. Smoking cessation interventions: review of evidence and implications for best practice in health care settings. Canberra: Publications Production Unit, Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing; 2002.
    1. Pan Wei. Proactive telephone counselling as an adjunct to minimal intervention for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:416–27. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl040.
    1. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. 5th ed. Aust Fam Phys. 2002;5:S1–61.
    1. West R, McNeil A, Raw M. Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an update. Thorax. 2000;55:987–99. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.12.987.
    1. National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability . Guidelines for smoking cessation. Revised. National Health Committee. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health; 2002.
    1. Stead LF, Perera R, Lancaster T. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;19:CD002850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002850.pub2.
    1. Ockene JK, Kristeller J, Goldberg R, Amick TL, Pekow PS, Hosmer D, Quirk M, Kalan K. Increasing the efficacy of physician-delivered smoking interventions: a randomized clinical trial. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:1–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02599381.
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2001 Census Data by Location. last accessed on 22 Nov 2006.
    1. Ward JE, Boyle K, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher R. Increasing women's compliance with opportunistic cervical cancer screening: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 1991;7:285–91.
    1. Donnelly N, Ward J, Dalrymple C. Validation of women's self-reported smoking status in the context of a colposcopy clinic. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaec. 2000;40:74–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2000.tb03172.x.
    1. Vartiainen E, Seppala T, Lillsunde P, Puska P. Validation of self-reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:167–70. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.3.167.
    1. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1086–93.
    1. Fagerström KO, Schneider NG. Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. J Behav Med. 1989;12:159–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00846549.
    1. Velicer W, Fava J, Prochaska J, Abrams D, Emmons K, Pierce J. Distribution of smokers by stage in three representative samples. Prev Med. 1995;24:401–11. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1065.
    1. SAS Institute Inc . The SAS System for Windows Version 91. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2005.
    1. The National Tobacco Campaign last accessed 22 Nov 206.
    1. The Woolcock Institute of Medical Research Nicotine Addiction and Smoking Cessation Training Course last accessed 22 Nov 2006.
    1. Zwar N, Richmond R, Borland R, Stillman S, Cunningham M, Litt J. Smoking cessation guidelines for Australian general practice. Aust Fam Phys. 2005;34:461–6.
    1. Lo CM. MPH treatise. University of New South Wales, Department of Public Health; 1999. Feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-assisted smoking cessation intervention in general practice.
    1. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991. pp. 466–7.
    1. Goldberg D, Tinson-Mitchem L, Hoffman A, Hoffman A, Burton D, Farinha M, Smith E, Marder D. Physician delivery of smoking cessation advice based on the stages-of-change model. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:267–274.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe