HABITAT: A longitudinal multilevel study of physical activity change in mid-aged adults

Nicola W Burton, Michele Haynes, Lee-Ann M Wilson, Billie Giles-Corti, Brian F Oldenburg, Wendy J Brown, Katrina Giskes, Gavin Turrell, Nicola W Burton, Michele Haynes, Lee-Ann M Wilson, Billie Giles-Corti, Brian F Oldenburg, Wendy J Brown, Katrina Giskes, Gavin Turrell

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the patterns and influences of physical activity change in mid-aged adults. This study describes the design, sampling, data collection, and analytical plan of HABITAT, an innovative study of (i) physical activity change over five years (2007-2011) in adults aged 40-65 years at baseline, and (ii) the relative contribution of psychological variables, social support, neighborhood perceptions, area-level factors, and sociodemographic characteristics to physical activity change.

Methods/design: HABITAT is a longitudinal multi-level study. 1625 Census Collection Districts (CCDs) in Brisbane, Australia were ranked by their index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage score, categorized into deciles, and 20 CCDs from each decile were selected to provide 200 local areas for study inclusion. From each of the 200 CCDs, dwellings with individuals aged between 40-65 years (in 2007) were identified using electoral roll data, and approximately 85 people per CCD were selected to participate (N = 17,000). A comprehensive Geographic Information System (GIS) database has been compiled with area-level information on public transport networks, footpaths, topography, traffic volume, street lights, tree coverage, parks, public services, and recreational facilities Participants are mailed a questionnaire every two years (2007, 2009, 2011), with items assessing physical activity (general walking, moderate activity, vigorous activity, walking for transport, cycling for transport, recreational activities), sitting time, perceptions of neighborhood characteristics (traffic, pleasant surroundings, streets, footpaths, crime and safety, distance to recreational and business facilities), social support, social cohesion, activity-related cognitions (attitudes, efficacy, barriers, motivation), health, and sociodemographic characteristics. Analyses will use binary and multinomial logit regression models, as well as generalized linear latent growth models.

Discussion: HABITAT will provide unique information to improve our understanding of the determinants of physical activity, and to help identify "people" and "place" priority targets for public policy and health promotion aimed at increasing physical activity participation among mid-aged men and women.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of sampling procedure to identify HABITAT study areas and participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of catchment areas to be derived to examine area-level characteristics of HABITAT areas. (a) Circular Buffer (Euclidean) (b) Network Buffer (c) Street Buffer.

References

    1. Haskell WL, Lee I-M, Pate R, Powell K, Blair S, Franklin B, Macera C, Heath G, Thompson P, Bauman A. Physical Activity and Public Health: Updated Recommendation for Adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2007;39:1423–1434. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27.
    1. Armstrong T, Bauman A, Davies J. Physical activity patterns of Australian adults. Results of the 1999 National Physical Activity Survey. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2000.
    1. Guthold RO, Strong T, Chatterji KL, Morabia SA. Worldwide variability in physical inactivity – A 51-country survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;34:486–494. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.013.
    1. Stamatakis E, Ekelund U, Wareham N. Temporal trends in physical activity in England: The Health Survey for England 1991 to 2004. Preventive Medicine. 2007;45:416–423. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.12.014.
    1. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1996;10:282–298.
    1. Breslow L. Social ecological strategies for promoting healthy lifestyles. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1996;10:253–257.
    1. Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown WJ. Correlates of adult's participation in physical activity: review and update. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2002;34:1996–2001. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00020.
    1. Seefeldt V, Malina RM, Clark MA. Factors affecting levels of physical activity in adults. Sports Medicine. 2002;32:143–168. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232030-00001.
    1. Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Dzewaltowski DA, Owen N. Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: The role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002;23:5–14. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00469-5.
    1. Sherwood NE, Jeffery RW. The behavioral determinants of exercise: Implications for physical activity interventions. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2000;20:21–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.20.1.21.
    1. Buckworth J. Exercise determinants and interventions. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 2000;31:305–320.
    1. Brown WJ, Burton NW, Heesch KC. Physical activity and health in mid age and older Australian women. The Office of Women, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs; 2008. ISBN: 978-1-921380-77-8. Retrieved December 16, 2008.
    1. Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T. Physical activity, fitness, and health: status and determinants. In: Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T, editor. Physical activity, fitness and health Consensus statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1993. pp. 33–39.
    1. Dishman RK. Exercise adherence. In: Singer RN, Murphy M, Tennant LK, editor. Handbook of research on sport psychology. New York: MacMillan Publishing; 1993. pp. 779–798.
    1. Dishman RK, (Ed) Advances in exercise adherence. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 1994.
    1. Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998;15:266–297. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00080-4.
    1. Laitakari J, Vuori I, Oja P. Is long-term maintenance of health-related physical activity possible? An analysis of concepts and evidence. Health Education Research. 1996;11:463–477. doi: 10.1093/her/11.4.463.
    1. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis J. Relative contribution of psychosocial variables to the explanation of physical activity in three population based adult samples. Preventive Medicine. 2002;34:279–288. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0979.
    1. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. The relative influence of individual, social, and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Social Science & Medicine. 2002;54:1793–1812. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00150-2.
    1. Sallis J, Haskell WL, Fortmann SP, Vranizan KM, Taylor CB, Solomon DS. Predictors of adoption and maintenance of physical activity in a community sample. Preventive Medicine. 1986;15:331–341. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90001-0.
    1. Humpel N, Owen N, Iverson D, Leslie E, Bauman A. Perceived environmental attributes, residential location and walking for particular purposes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004;26:119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.005.
    1. Burton NW, Turrell G, Oldenburg B, Sallis J. The relative contributions of psychological, social, and environmental variables to explain participation in walking, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity leisure-time physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2005;3:181–196.
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics . Socio-economic Indexes for Areas, Australia, 2001. Information Paper, Census of Population and Housing. Canberra; 2003. pp. 1–30.
    1. Kavanagh AM, Goller JL, King T, Jolley D, Crawford D, Turrell G. Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2005;59:934–940. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.035931.
    1. HLM Software . Optimal Design for Multilevel and Longitudinal Research. 1.77 2006.
    1. Lee C, Dobson AJ, Brown WJ, Bryson L, Byles J, Warner-Smith P, Young AF. Cohort Profile: the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;34:987–991. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi098.
    1. Burton NW, Oldenburg B, Sallis JF, Turrell G. Measuring psychological, social, and environmental influences on leisure-time physical activity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2007;31:36–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00008.x.
    1. Buckner J. The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1988;16:771–791. doi: 10.1007/BF00930892.
    1. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Chichester: Wiley, New York; 2000.
    1. Brown WB, Burton NW, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Reliability and validity of a modified self-administered version of the Active Australia physical 2 activity survey in a sample of mid-age women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2008;32:535–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00305.x.
    1. Brown WJ, Bauman A, Chey T, Trost SG, Mummery WK. Comparison of surveys used to measure physical activity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2004;28:128–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00925.x.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. O'Brien K, Webbie K. Are all Australians gaining weight? Differentials in overweight and obesity among adults, 1989–90 to 2001. Bulletin No. 11. AIHW Cat. No. AUS 39. Canberra: AIHW; 2003.
    1. Mathers CD, Vos ET, Stevenson CE, Begg SJ. The Australian burden of disease study: measuring the loss of health from diseases, injuries and risk factors. Medical Journal of Australia. 2000;172:592–596.
    1. Stephenson J, Bauman A, Armstrong T, Smith B, Bellew B. The costs of illness attributable to physical inactivity in Australia: a preliminary study. Canberra: The Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care and the Australian Sports Commission; 2000.
    1. World Health Organisation . The World Health Report, 2002. Reducing risk and promoting healthy life. Geneva: The World Health Organisation; 2002.
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Janssen I. The economic costs associated with physical inactivity and obesity in Canada: an update. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology. 2004;29:90–115.
    1. Colditz GA. Economic costs of obesity and inactivity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1999;31:S663–667. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199911001-00026.
    1. Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Social Science & Medicine. 2001;31:91–100.
    1. Bauman AE. Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000–2003. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2004;7:6–19. doi: 10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80273-1.
    1. Turrell G, Najman JM. Collecting food-related data from low socioeconomic groups: how adequate are our current research designs? Australian Journal of Public Health. 1995;19:410–416.
    1. Van Campen C, Sixma M, Kerssens JJ, Peters L. Comparisons of the costs and quality of patient data collection by mail versus telephone versus in-person interviews. European Journal of Public Health. 1998;8:66–70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/8.1.66.
    1. Burton NW, Turrell G, Oldenburg B. Item non-response in a population-based study of physical activity. Physical Activity and Health. 2004;1:345–361.
    1. Van Loon AJM, Tijhuis M, Picavet HSJ, Surtees PG, Ormel J. Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations. Annals of Epidemiology. 2003;13:105–110. doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00257-0.
    1. McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo G, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Affairs. 2002;21:78–93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.78.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe