Computed tomographic coronary angiography for patients with heart failure (CTA-HF): a randomized controlled trial (IMAGE HF Project 1-C)

Benjamin J W Chow, Rachel E Green, Doug Coyle, Mika Laine, Helena Hanninen, Hanna Leskinen, Miroslav Rajda, Eric Larose, Juha Hartikainen, Marja Hedman, Lisa Mielniczuk, Eileen O'Meara, Robert A deKemp, Ran Klein, Ian Paterson, James A White, Seppo Yla-Herttuala, Alex Leber, Vikas Tandon, Ting Lee, Abdul Al-Hesayen, Renee Hessian, Taylor Dowsley, Malek Kass, Cathy Kelly, Linda Garrard, Jean-Claude Tardif, Juhani Knuuti, Rob S Beanlands, George A Wells, IMAGE-HF Investigators, Benjamin J W Chow, Rachel E Green, Doug Coyle, Mika Laine, Helena Hanninen, Hanna Leskinen, Miroslav Rajda, Eric Larose, Juha Hartikainen, Marja Hedman, Lisa Mielniczuk, Eileen O'Meara, Robert A deKemp, Ran Klein, Ian Paterson, James A White, Seppo Yla-Herttuala, Alex Leber, Vikas Tandon, Ting Lee, Abdul Al-Hesayen, Renee Hessian, Taylor Dowsley, Malek Kass, Cathy Kelly, Linda Garrard, Jean-Claude Tardif, Juhani Knuuti, Rob S Beanlands, George A Wells, IMAGE-HF Investigators

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is rising in industrialized and developing countries. Though invasive coronary angiography (ICA) remains the gold standard for anatomical assessment of coronary artery disease in HF patients, alternatives are being sought. Computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) has emerged as an accurate non-invasive diagnostic tool for coronary artery disease (CAD) and has been demonstrated to have prognostic value. Whether or not CTA can be used in HF patients is unknown. Acknowledging the aging population, the growing prevalence of HF and the increasing financial burden of healthcare, we need to identify non-invasive diagnostic tests that are available, safe, accurate and cost-effective.

Methods/design: The proposed study aims to provide insight into the efficacy of CTA in HF patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial will enroll 250 HF patients requiring coronary anatomical definition. Enrolled patients will be randomized to either CTA or ICA (n = 125 per group) as the first test to define coronary anatomy. The primary outcomes will be collected to determine downstream resource utilization. Secondary outcomes will include the composite clinical events and major adverse cardiac events. In addition, the accuracy of CTA for detecting coronary anatomy and obstruction will be assessed in patients who subsequently undergo both CTA and ICA. It is expected that CTA will be a more cost-effective strategy for diagnosis: yielding similar outcomes with fewer procedural risks and improved resource utilization.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01283659. Team grant #CIF 99470.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
IMAGE-HF Project I-C: experimental algorithm to evaluate use of tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) in determination of heart failure (HF) etiology. Figure 1 illustrates the experimental model of this study, in which the ability of CTA to determine etiology of HF will be compared to that of invasive coronary angiography (ICA). All patients exhibiting HF of unknown etiology will be considered; patients with contraindications to CTA will be excluded.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timeline for IMAGE-HF Project I-C patient follow-up.

References

    1. Johansen H, Strauss B, Arnold JM, Moe G, Liu P. On the rise: The current and projected future burden of congestive heart failure hospitalization in Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2003;14:430–435.
    1. Schocken DD, Arrieta MI, Leaverton PE, Ross EA. Prevalence and mortality rate of congestive heart failure in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;14:301–306. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90094-4.
    1. Ghali JK, Cooper R, Ford E. Trends in hospitalization rates for heart failure in the United States, 1973–1986. Evidence for increasing population prevalence. Arch Intern Med. 1990;14:769–773. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1990.00390160043010.
    1. Chow BJ, Freeman MR, Bowen JM, Levin L, Hopkins RB, Provost Y, Tarride JE, Dennie C, Cohen EA, Marcuzzi D, Iwanochko R, Moody AR, Paul N, Parker JD, O’Reilly DJ, Xie F, Goeree R. Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: Field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med. 2011;14:1021–1029.
    1. Chow BJW, Abraham A, Wells GA, Chen L, Ruddy TD, Yam Y, Govas N, Galbraith PD, Dennie C, Beanlands RS. Diagnostic accuracy and impact of computed tomographic coronary angiography on utilization of invasive coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imag. 2009;14:16–23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.792572.
    1. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, Scherer M, Bellinger R, Martin A, Benton R, Delago A, Min JK. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;14:1724–1732. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031.
    1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JAC. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;14:2324–2336. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576.
    1. Meijboom WB, Meijs MFL, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CAG, Nieman K, van Werkhoven JM, Pundziute G, Weustink AC, de Vos AM, Pugliese F, Rensing B, Jukema JW, Bax JJ, Prokop M, Doevendans PA, Hunink MGM, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: A prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;14:2135–2144. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058.
    1. Chow BJW, Wells GA, Chen L, Yam Y, Galiwango P, Abraham A, Sheth T, Dennie C, Beanlands RS, Ruddy TD. Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography: Severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis and left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;14:1017–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.039.
    1. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Okin PM, Weinsaft JW, Russo DJ, Lippolis NJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;14:1161–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.067.
    1. Ostrom MP, Gopal A, Ahmadi N, Nasir K, Yang E, Kakadiaris I, Flores F, Mao SS, Budoff MJ. Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;14:1335–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.027.
    1. Beanlands RS, Nichol G, Huszti E, Humen D, Racine N, Freeman M, Gulenchyn KY, Garrard L, DeKemp R, Guo A, Ruddy TD, Benard F, Lamy A, Iwanochko RM. F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;14:2002–2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.006.
    1. O'Meara E, Mielniczuk L, Wells G, DeKemp R, Klein R, Coyle D, Mc Ardle B, Paterson I, White J, Arnold M, Friedrich M, Larose E, Dick A, Chow B, Dennie C, Haddad H, Ruddy T, Ukkonen H, Wisenberg G, Cantin B, Pibarot P, Freeman M, Turcotte E, Connelly K, Clarke J, Williams K, Racine N, Garrard L, Tardif JC, DaSilva J, Knuuti J, Beanlands R. the IMAGE HF. Alternative Imaging Modalities in Ischemic Heart Failure (AIMI-HF) IMAGE HF Project I-A: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:218. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-218.
    1. Paterson I, Wells GA, Ezekowitz JA, White JA, Friedrich MG, Mielniczuk LM, O’Meara E, Chow B. Rationale and Design of the OUTSMART-HF trial: Routine vs Selective Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Non-Ischemic Heart Failure (IMAGE-HF 1B: OUTSMART-HF) Trials. 2013. In press.
    1. Abunassar JG, Yam Y, Chen L, D’Mello N, Chow BJ. Usefulness of the Agatston score = 0 to exclude ischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2011;14:428–432. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.09.040.
    1. Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ. 1999;14:342–364.
    1. Petrou S, Gray A. Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2011;14:1–6.
    1. Barber J, Thompson S. Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalised linear models. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;14:197–204. doi: 10.1258/1355819042250249.
    1. Manning WG, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ. 2001;14:461–494. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8.
    1. Basu A, Rathouz PJ. Estimating marginal and incremental effects on health outcomes using flexible link and variance function models. Biostatistics. 2005;14:93–109. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh020.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe