IMAGE-HF Project I-C: Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Heart Failure Patients (CTA-HF)

November 20, 2019 updated by: Rob Beanlands, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Heart Failure Patients (CTA -HF) Project I-C of Imaging Modalities to Assist With Guiding Therapy and the Evaluation of Patients With Heart Failure (IMAGE-HF)

Background: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is rapidly rising in industrialized and developing countries. Though invasive coronary angiography (ICA) remains the gold standard for anatomical assessment of coronary arteries and luminal stenoses in these patients, alternatives have been sought. Computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) has emerged as an accurate non-invasive diagnostic tool for CAD and has been demonstrated to have prognostic value. Whether or not CTA can be used in patients with HF for diagnosis and to guide patient investigations and management is unknown. Acknowledging the aging population in industrialized counties, the increasing burden of healthcare and growing prevalence of HF, there is a need to identify non-invasive diagnostic tests that are cost-effective, readily available, safe and of sufficient accuracy to risk stratify patients and guide investigations and management.

Methods: The proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the clinical utility of computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) and investigate its potential benefit on resource utilization and health economics in patients with progressive or newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) of unknown etiology (i.e. ischemic versus non- ischemic) or in whom the definition of coronary anatomy is required for diagnosis and management. The experimental algorithm will be compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA)

Analysis of composite clinical events and major adverse cardiac events will be performed to determine the impact of these strategies upon patient outcomes. Accuracy of CTA in detection of coronary anatomy and obstruction will be assessed in patients undergoing ICA. It is expected that CTA will be a more cost-effective strategy for diagnosis; yielding similar outcomes with fewer procedural risks and improved resource utilization.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Hypotheses Primary Hypothesis: Compared to ICA, a diagnostic strategy algorithm using CTA for patients with HF of unknown etiology or where the definition of coronary anatomy is required for diagnosis and management, will result in a reduction in downstream resource utilization and per patient cost.

Secondary Hypotheses: I) Compared to standard care, a strategy that uses CTA will achieve: a) similar composite clinical events (CCE), quality of life (QoL), major adverse cardiac events (MACE); b) a lower rate of procedure related complications (death, MI, stroke, vascular complications, severe allergic reactions; contrast nephropathy); c) a lower rate of normal ICA. II) Using patient-based analysis and vessel-based analysis, CTA has very good agreement with ICA among patients with HF in the CTA arm who proceed to ICA.

Objectives The primary objective is to understand the role of CTA in patients with HF of unknown etiology. We propose a prospective randomized study of 250 patients to examine the potential impact of CTA compared to ICAon resource utilization and health care costs in patients with HF with unknown CAD status.

Secondary objectives are to: compare CCE, QoL and MACE in the CTA and ICA arms. Radiation exposure and safety in both groups will also be assessed.

Trial design The proposed trial is a multicentre randomized controlled trial of 250 patients. In addition, a retrospective review of the current CTA and ICA databases at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute will be conducted to identify an additional cohort of patients (200-400) where the imaging modality decision has already been made. These patients are not eligible for randomization, but will be entered into a registry.

Trial interventions - Randomization All HF patients requiring investigation to determine the etiology of HF (ischemic versus non-ischemic) will be screened for the study. Patients will be randomized to the investigation arm CTA or ICA. Patients will be stratified according to recruitment site and pre-test probability for obstructive CAD. A stratified block (varying sizes) randomization scheme will be used. Within each strata, patients will be randomized with varying block sizes into the two study groups. A central randomization scheme (envelope), which will ensure concealment, will be used and the local research co-ordinator will perform patient assignments. The randomization scheme will be generated by a statistician using a SAS macro.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

253

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • University of Calgary
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
        • University of Alberta
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
        • University of Manitoba
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
        • Dalhousie University
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Hamilton Health Sciences Centre
      • London, Ontario, Canada
        • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
        • University of Ottawa Heart Institute
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • St. Michael's Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • SunnyBrook Health Sciences Centre
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Montreal Heart Institute
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
        • University of Laval
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
        • Université de Sherbrooke
      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Helsinki University Central Hospital,
      • Kuopio, Finland
        • University of Kuopio
      • Turku, Finland
        • University of Turku

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria Eligible HF patients with an admission to hospital or emergency room for heart failure

OR

a documented history of left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <50%)

OR

a documented history of Class ll-lV heart failure symptoms, in the preceding 12 months prior to enrollment, in whom the diagnosis of CAD is uncertain or the definition of coronary anatomy is required for diagnosis and management.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Age < 18 years or lack of consent,
  2. Renal Insufficiency (GFR < 45 ml/min);
  3. Allergy to intravenous contrast agents;
  4. Contraindication to radiation exposure (e.g. pregnancy);
  5. Uncontrolled HR at time of scan (as per local clinical routine)
  6. History of revascularization (CABG or PCI);
  7. Atrial fibrillation, frequent atrial or ventricular ectopy (> 1 / minute);
  8. Unable to perform 20 second breath-hold;
  9. CTA or ICA within the preceding 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard imaging (coronary angiography)
Subjects will undergo a coronary angiogram as planned by their attending doctor
Other Names:
  • Coronary Angiography
Active Comparator: Advanced imaging (CTA)
Subjects will undergo a CTA scan first. Based on the CTA results, subjects may or may not proceed to coronary angiography. CTA results will be reviewed by the attending physician.
Other Names:
  • Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resource Utilization
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
Primary Outcome Measure: Resource Utilization: will be measured as detailed in Appendix A. Cost: the incremental cost of the diagnostic strategy using CTA will be the primary endpoint and will be estimated through regression methods.
3 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Endpoints
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months
CCE, LV Function, QoL, and Safety: will measured.
3 and 12 months
CTA Accuracy
Time Frame: Baseline
CTA Accuracy: To address one of the secondary hypotheses: the accuracy in the cohort of patients with CTA undergoing ICA (~ n=100) diagnostic test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios) will be determined and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rob SB Beanlands, MD, FRCP C, University of OttawaHeart Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Chow, MD, FRCP C, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Project I-C
  • CIF-99470 (Other Identifier: Canadian Institutes of Health Research)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Standard Imaging

3
Subscribe