Associating school doctor interventions with the benefit of the health check: an observational study

Kirsi Nikander, Silja Kosola, Tero Vahlberg, Minna Kaila, Elina Hermanson, Kirsi Nikander, Silja Kosola, Tero Vahlberg, Minna Kaila, Elina Hermanson

Abstract

Background: The benefits of school doctor interventions conducted at routine general health checks remain insufficiently studied. This study explored the associations of school doctor interventions with the doctor-evaluated and parent-evaluated benefits of routine health checks.

Methods: Between August 2017 and August 2018, we recruited a random sample of 1341 children from grades 1 and 5 from 21 Finnish elementary schools in 4 municipalities. Doctors routinely examined all children, who were accompanied by parents. The doctor-reported interventions were categorised into six groups: instructions and/or significant discussions, prescriptions, laboratory tests and/or medical imaging, scheduling of follow-up appointments, referrals to other professionals and referrals to specialised care. Doctors evaluated the benefit of the appointment using predetermined criteria, and parents provided their subjective perceptions of benefit. Interventions and reported benefit were compared using multilevel logistic regression.

Results: Doctors reported 52% and parents 87% of the appointments with interventions beneficial. All interventions were independently associated with doctor-evaluated benefit (ORs: 1.91-17.26). Receiving any intervention during the appointment was associated with parent-evaluated benefit (OR: 3.25, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.75). In analyses of different interventions, instructions and/or significant discussions (OR: 1.71, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.44), prescriptions (OR: 7.44, 95% CI 2.32 to 23.91) and laboratory tests and/or medical imaging (OR: 3.38, 95% CI 1.34 to 8.55) were associated with parent-evaluated benefit. Scheduled follow-up appointments and referrals to other professionals showed no significant association with parent-evaluated benefit.

Conclusions: Doctors and parents valued the appointments with interventions. Parents especially appreciated immediate help and testing from the doctor.

Trial registration number: NCT03178331.

Keywords: health services research.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Baltag V, Pachyna A, Hall J. Global overview of school health services: data from 102 countries. Health Behav Policy Rev 2015;2:268–83. 10.14485/HBPR.2.4.4
    1. Baltag V, Levi M. Organizational models of school health services in the who European region. J Health Organ Manag 2013;27:733–46. 10.1108/JHOM-08-2011-0084
    1. Jansen D, Visser A, Vervoort JPM, et al. . School and adolescent health services in 30 European countries: a description of structure and functioning, and of health outcomes and costs, 2018. Available: [Accessed 15 Nov 2021].
    1. van der Pol S, Postma MJ, Jansen DEMC. School health in Europe: a review of workforce expenditure across five countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:206. 10.1186/s12913-020-05077-w
    1. Leroy ZC, Wallin R, Lee S. The role of school health services in addressing the needs of students with chronic health conditions. J Sch Nurs 2017;33:64–72. 10.1177/1059840516678909
    1. Knopf JA, Finnie RKC, Peng Y, et al. . School-based health centers to advance health equity: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2016;51:114–26. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.009
    1. Best NC, Oppewal S, Travers D. Exploring school nurse interventions and health and education outcomes: an integrative review. J Sch Nurs 2018;34:14–27. 10.1177/1059840517745359
    1. Harris K, Kneale D, Lasserson TJ. School-Based self-management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019:CD011651. 10.1002/14651858.CD011651.pub2
    1. Ran T, Chattopadhyay SK, Hahn RA. Economic evaluation of school-based health centers. Am J Prev Med 2016;51:129–38. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.017
    1. Wilson P, Wood R, Lykke K, et al. . International variation in programmes for assessment of children's neurodevelopment in the community: understanding disparate approaches to evaluation of motor, social, emotional, behavioural and cognitive function. Scand J Public Health 2018;46:805–16. 10.1177/1403494818772211
    1. Nikander K, Kosola S, Kaila M, et al. . Who benefit from school doctors' health checks: a prospective study of a screening method. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:501. 10.1186/s12913-018-3295-3
    1. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health . Valtioneuvoston asetus neuvolatoiminnasta, koulu- ja opiskeluterveydenhuollosta sekä lasten ja nuorten ehkäisevästä suun terveydenhuollosta (The government decree on maternity and child health clinic services, school and student health services and preventive oral health services for children and youth), 2011. Available: [Accessed 18 Jan 2022].
    1. Nikander K, Hermanson E, Vahlberg T, et al. . Associations between study questionnaire-assessed need and school doctor-evaluated benefit of routine health checks: an observational study. BMC Pediatr 2021;21:346. 10.1186/s12887-021-02810-0
    1. Levinson J, Kohl K, Baltag V, et al. . Investigating the effectiveness of school health services delivered by a health provider: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS One 2019;14:e0212603. 10.1371/journal.pone.0212603
    1. World Health Organization . WHO guideline on school health services, 2021. Available: [Accessed 15 Nov 2021].
    1. Skokauskas N, Fung D, Flaherty LT, et al. . Shaping the future of child and adolescent psychiatry. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2019;13:19. 10.1186/s13034-019-0279-y
    1. Gilbert R, Kemp A, Thoburn J, et al. . Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. The Lancet 2009;373:167–80. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61707-9
    1. World Health Organization . WHO guidelines for the health sector response to child maltreatment., 2019. Available: [Accessed 15 Nov 2021].
    1. Bezem J, Theunissen M, Kamphuis M, et al. . A novel triage approach to identifying health concerns. Pediatrics 2016;137:e20150814–0814. 10.1542/peds.2015-0814
    1. Wen J, Snyder C. Prevalence of innocent murmurs in pediatric patients. pediatrics, 2019. Available: [Accessed 25 Jan 2022].
    1. Kostopoulou E, Dimitriou G, Karatza A. Cardiac murmurs in children: a challenge for the primary care physician. Curr Pediatr Rev 2019;15:131–8. 10.2174/1573396315666190321105536
    1. Laurant M, van der Biezen M, Wijers N, et al. . Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;7:CD001271. 10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub3
    1. Coon ER, Quinonez RA, Moyer VA, et al. . Overdiagnosis: how our compulsion for diagnosis may be harming children. Pediatrics 2014;134:1013–23. 10.1542/peds.2014-1778
    1. Sicherer SH, Wood RA, American Academy of Pediatrics Section On Allergy And Immunology . Allergy testing in childhood: using allergen-specific IgE tests. Pediatrics 2012;129:193–7. 10.1542/peds.2011-2382
    1. Venekamp RP, Hearne BJ, Chandrasekharan D. Tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy versus non-surgical management for obstructive sleep-disordered breathing in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD011165. 10.1002/14651858.CD011165.pub2
    1. Morrow RL, Garland EJ, Wright JM, et al. . Influence of relative age on diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Can Med Assoc J 2012;184:755–62. 10.1503/cmaj.111619
    1. Merten EC, Cwik JC, Margraf J, et al. . Overdiagnosis of mental disorders in children and adolescents (in developed countries). Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2017;11:5. 10.1186/s13034-016-0140-5
    1. Pattin AJ, Devore N, Fowler J, et al. . An examination of the prescription renewal process and implications for primary care physicians and community pharmacists. J Pharm Pract 2020;33:187–91. 10.1177/0897190018799217
    1. Vasan A, Krass P, Seifu L, et al. . Pediatric provider perspectives and practices regarding health policy discussions with families: a mixed methods study. BMC Pediatr 2020;20:343. 10.1186/s12887-020-02238-y
    1. Arai L, Stapley S, Roberts H. 'Did not attends' in children 0-10: a scoping review. Child Care Health Dev 2014;40:797–805. 10.1111/cch.12111
    1. Crone MR, Zeijl E, Reijneveld SA. When do parents and child health professionals agree on child's psychosocial problems? Cross-sectional study on parent-child health professional dyads. BMC Psychiatry 2016;16:151. 10.1186/s12888-016-0867-9
    1. Spencer N, Raman S, O'Hare B, et al. . Addressing inequities in child health and development: towards social justice. BMJ Paediatr Open 2019;3:e000503. 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000503
    1. Baxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, et al. . The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:350. 10.1186/s12913-018-3161-3
    1. Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med 1996;125:605–13. 10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00011
    1. Alemán-Díaz AY, Backhaus S, Siebers LL, et al. . Child and adolescent health in Europe: monitoring implementation of policies and provision of services. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018;2:891–904. 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30286-4
    1. Rocha TB-M, Graeff-Martins AS, Kieling C, et al. . Provision of mental healthcare for children and adolescents: a worldwide view. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2015;28:330–5. 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000169
    1. Häkkänen P, Ketola E, Laatikainen T. Development of overweight and obesity among primary school children-a longitudinal cohort study. Fam Pract 2016;33:368–73. 10.1093/fampra/cmw042

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe