Two-point discrimination values vary depending on test site, sex and test modality in the orofacial region: a preliminary study

Sang-Yeun Won, Hye-Kyoung Kim, Mee-Eun Kim, Ki-Suk Kim, Sang-Yeun Won, Hye-Kyoung Kim, Mee-Eun Kim, Ki-Suk Kim

Abstract

Objective: The aims of the present study were to determine the normal values of TPD in the six trigeminal sites (the forehead, cheek, mentum, upper lip, lower lip, and the tongue tip) and to investigate the effect of the site, sex, and test modality on the TPD perception.

Material and methods: Forty healthy volunteers consisting of age-matched men (20) and women (20) with a mean age of 27.1 years were recruited. One examiner performed the TPD test using a simple hand-operated device, i.e., by drawing compass with a blunt or sharp-pointed tip. The static TPD with a blunt-pointed tip (STPDB), moving TPD with a blunt-pointed tip (MTPDB), and static TPD with a sharp-pointed tip (STPDS) were measured. The predictors were the site, sex, and test modality, and the outcome variable was the TPD value. Three-way ANOVA was used for statistics.

Results: The analysis showed a significant effect of the site, sex and test modality on the TPD values. Significant differences between the test sites were observed with the descending order from the forehead and cheek>mentum>upper lip and lower lip>tongue tip and index finger. Women showed lower TPD values than those of men. The STPDS measurements were consistently lower than those of the STPDB and MTPDB.

Conclusions: The normal values of TPD in this study suggest that the cheek and forehead were less sensitive than other regions evaluated and women were more sensitive than men. The STPDS was the most sensitive test modality.

Figures

Figure 1. Handheld devices used for measuring…
Figure 1. Handheld devices used for measuring two-point discrimination values

References

    1. Abraira VE, Ginty DD. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron. 2013;79:618–639.
    1. Bell-Krotoski JA, Buford WL., Jr The force/time relationship of clinically used sensory testing instruments. J Hand Ther. 1997;10:297–309.
    1. Chen CC, Essick GK, Kelly DG, Young MG, Nestor JM, Masse B. Gender-, side- and site-dependent variations in human perioral spatial resolution. Arch Oral Biol. 1995;40:539–548.
    1. Dellon AL. The moving two-point discrimination test: clinical evaluation of the quickly adapting fiber/receptor system. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3:474–481.
    1. Dellon AL. Management of peripheral nerve problems in the upper and lower extremity using quantitative sensory testing. Hand Clin. 1999;15:697–715.
    1. Dellon AL, Andonian E, DeJesus RA. Measuring sensibility of the trigeminal nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1546–1550.
    1. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE, Crosby PM. Reliability of two-point discrimination measurements. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12:693–696.
    1. Friedline CL. The discrimination of cutaneous patterns below the two-point limen. Am J Psychol. 1918;29:400–419.
    1. Jerosch-Herold C. Should sensory function after median nerve injury and repair be quantified using two-point discrimination as the critical measure? Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2000;34:339–343.
    1. Kaneko A, Asai N, Kanda T. The influence of age on pressure perception of static and moving two-point discrimination in normal subjects. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:421–424.
    1. Lehr R. Sixteen S-squared over D-squared: a relation for crude sample size estimates. Stat Med. 1992;11:1099–1102.
    1. Louis DS, Greene TL, Jacobson KE, Rasmussen C, Kolowich P, Goldstein SA. Evaluation of normal values for stationary and moving two-point discrimination in the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9:552–555.
    1. Lundborg G, Rosèn B. The two-point discrimination test-time for a re-appraisal? J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29:418–422.
    1. Moberg E. Two-point discrimination test. A valuable part of hand surgical rehabilitation, e.g. in tetraplegia. Scand J Rehab Med. 1990;22:127–134.
    1. Nolano M, Provitera V, Crisci C, Stancanelli A, Wendelschafer-Crabb G, Kennedy WR, et al. Quantification of myelinated endings and mechanoreceptors in human digital skin. Ann Neurol. 2003;54:197–205.
    1. Peters RM, Hackeman E, Goldreich D. Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity. J Neurosci. 2009;29:15756–15761.
    1. Sato T, Okada Y, Miyamoto T, Fujiyama R. Distributions of sensory spots in the hand and two-point discrimination thresholds in the hand, face and mouth in dental students. J Physiol Paris. 1999;93:245–250.
    1. Shibukawa Y. Cortical mechanism of oral sensation in human. Int J Oral-Med Sci. 2009;8:65–73.
    1. Stevens JS, Choo KK. Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res. 1996;13:153–166.
    1. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, List T, Eliav E, Ettlin D, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for assessment of somatosensory function in oro-facial pain conditions - a taskforce report. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:366–394.
    1. Tamura Y, Hoshiyama M, Inul K, Kakigi R. Central mechanisms for two-point discrimination in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2003;342:187–190.
    1. Trulsson M, Essick GK. Low-threshold mechanoreceptive afferents in the human lingual nerve. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:737–748.
    1. Vallbo AB, Johansson RS. Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum Neurobiol. 1984;3:3–14.
    1. Van Boven RW, Johnson KO. The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue, and finger. Neurology. 1994;44:2361–2366.
    1. Vriens JP, Glas HW van der. The relationship of facial two-point discrimination to applied force under clinical test conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:943–952.
    1. Vriens JP, Glas HW van der. Extension of normal values on sensory function for facial areas using clinical tests on touch and two-point discrimination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:1154–1158.
    1. Weinstein S. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a fuction of body part, sex and laterality. In: Kenshalo DR, ed, editor. The skin senses. Springfield: Charles C.Thomas; 1968. pp. 195–222.
    1. Weisenberger JM. Cutaneous perception. In: Goldstein EB, ed, editor. Blackell handbook of sensation and perception. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2001. p. 536.
    1. Yamada N, Kashima Y, Inoué T. Scanning electron microscopy of the basal surface of the epidermis of human digits. Acta Anat. 1996;155:242–248. Basel.
    1. Zuniga JR, Meyer RA, Gregg JM, Miloro M, Davis LF. The accuracy of clinical neurosensory testing for nerve injury diagnosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56:2–8.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe