How human brucellosis incidence in urban Kampala can be reduced most efficiently? A stochastic risk assessment of informally-marketed milk

Kohei Makita, Eric M Fèvre, Charles Waiswa, Mark C Eisler, Susan C Welburn, Kohei Makita, Eric M Fèvre, Charles Waiswa, Mark C Eisler, Susan C Welburn

Abstract

Background: In Kampala, Uganda, studies have shown a significant incidence of human brucellosis. A stochastic risk assessment involving two field surveys (cattle farms and milk shops) and a medical record survey was conducted to assess the risk of human brucellosis infection through consumption of informally marketed raw milk potentially infected with Brucella abortus in Kampala and to identify the best control options.

Methodology/principal findings: In the cattle farm survey, sera of 425 cows in 177 herds in the Kampala economic zone were sampled and tested for brucellosis using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CELISA). Farmers were interviewed for dairy information. In the milk shop surveys, 135 milk sellers in the urban areas were interviewed and 117 milk samples were collected and tested using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IELISA). A medical record survey was conducted in Mulago National Referral Hospital for serological test results. A risk model was developed synthesizing data from these three surveys. Possible control options were prepared based on the model and the reduction of risk was simulated for each scenario. Overall, 12.6% (6.8-18.9: 90%CI) of informally marketed milk in urban Kampala was contaminated with B.abortus at purchase and the annual incidence rate was estimated to be 5.8 (90% CI: 5.3-6.2) per 10,000 people. The best control option would be the construction of a milk boiling centre either in Mbarara, the largest source of milk, or in peri-urban Kampala and to ensure that milk traders always sell milk to the boiling centre; 90% success in enforcing these two options would reduce risk by 47.4% (21.6-70.1: 90%CI) and 82.0% (71.0-89.0: 90%CI), respectively.

Conclusion/significance: This study quantifies the risk of human brucellosis infection through informally marketed milk and estimates the incidence rate in Kampala for the first time; risk-based mitigation strategies are outlined to assist in developing policy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Structure of data sets and…
Figure 1. Structure of data sets and a risk model for brucellosis in Kampala.
LC1 is Local Council I, the smallest administrative unit of Uganda. The largest rectangular area of the Ven diagram represents all the 790 LC1s in the selected 10 LC3s.
Figure 2. Diagram showing dairy value chain…
Figure 2. Diagram showing dairy value chain in urban areas of Kampala.
Solid lines show raw milk distribution although some proportion is boiled. Dashed lines show distribution of treated milk from boiling centres. The width of lines represents a variation in quantity of milk distributed.
Figure 3. Map showing distribution of milk…
Figure 3. Map showing distribution of milk from production areas to Kampala.
The width of arrows represents the quantities of milk transported.
Figure 4. Sources of infected milk with…
Figure 4. Sources of infected milk with Brucella abortus by the types of milk sellers and the proportions of milk sold.
Figure 5. Sources of infected milk with…
Figure 5. Sources of infected milk with Brucella abortus by the production areas and the proportions of milk distributed.

References

    1. WHO. In Zoonoses and veterinary public health, World Health Organization website; 2009. Seven neglected endemic zoonoses- some basic facts.
    1. Makita K, Fèvre EM, Waiswa C, Kaboyo, Bronsvoort BMDC, et al. Human brucellosis in urban and peri-urban areas of Kampala, Uganda. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1149:309–311.
    1. Newton FJ, Jones E, Connor RJ, Davidson BJ, McGovern PT. A survey of bovine brucellosis in four districts of Uganda. Br Vet J. 1974;130:249–254.
    1. Ndyabahinduka DGK. Brucellosis: an increasing public health hazard in Uganda. Ann Ist Super Sanità. 1978;14:229–234.
    1. Oloffs A, Bauman MPO, Afema J, Nakavuma J. Experiences with a strategy to investigate bovine brucellosis in a rural area in Southwest Uganda. Revue d'élevage et de médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux. 1988;51:101–105.
    1. Nakavuma J. Makerere University, Kampala: Masters Thesis; 1994. Serological survey of Brucella abortus in cattle and goats in the central and southern regions of Uganda, Masters Thesis.
    1. Mwiine FN. Makerere University, Kampala: Master Thesis; 2004. Benefits and health risks associated with milk and cattle raised in urban and peri-urban areas of Kampala City.
    1. Faye B, Castel V, Lesnoff M, Rutabinda D, Dhalwa J. Tuberculosis and brucellosis prevalence survey on dairy cattle in Mbarara milk basin (Uganda). Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2005;67:267–281.
    1. Staal SJ, Kaguongo WN. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI); 2003. The Ugandan dairy subsector targeting development opportunities.
    1. WHO. Brucellosis in humans and animals (World Health Organization) 2006.
    1. Kyebambe PS. Acute Brucella meningomyeloencephalo - spondylosis in a teenage male. Afr Health Sci. 2005;5:69–72.
    1. Kunda J, Fitzpatrick J, Kazwala R, French NP, Shirima G, et al. Health-seeking behaviour of human brucellosis cases in rural Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:315.
    1. FAO. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1953. Milk pasteurization; Planning, plant, operation and control.
    1. Wilson GS. London: Edward Arnold & CO; 1942. The pasteurization of milk.
    1. Grace D, Nasinyama G, Randolph TF, Mwiine F, Kang'ethe E. City dairying in Kampala: integrating benefits and harms, In: Cole D, Lee-Smith D, Nasinyama G, editors. Healthy City Harvests: Generating evidence to guide policy on urban agriculture. International Potato Centre (CIP) and Makerere University Press; 2008.
    1. Arimi SM, Koroti E, Kang'ethe EK, Omore AO, McDermott JJ. Risk of infection with Brucella abortus and Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with marketing of unpasteurized milk in Kenya. Acta Tropica. 2005;96:1–8.
    1. Kang'ethe EK, Ekuttan CE, Kimani VN, Kiragu MW. Investigation into the prevalence of bovine brucellosis and the risk factors that predispose humans to infection among urban dairy and non-dairy farming households in Dagoretti Division, Nairobi, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2007;84:96–100.
    1. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Principles and Guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment 1999.
    1. Kaplan J, Keogh A. Temperature shifts induce the selective loss of alveolar-macrophage plasma membrane components. J Cell Biol. 1982;94:12–19.
    1. Schlesinger RB, Fine JM, Chen LC. Interspecies differences in the phagocytic activity of pulmonary macrophages subjected to acidic challenge. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1992;19:584–589.
    1. Tetley TD. Macrophages and the Pathogenesis of COPD. Chest. 2002;121:156S–159S.
    1. Zúñiga E, Mota DLGL, Sánchez MM, Santos LEM, Filardo KS, et al. Survival of Brucella abortus in milk fermented with a yoghurt starter culture. Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 2005;47:88–91.
    1. Bartholomew M, Vose DJ, Tollefson LR, Travis CC. A Linear Model for Managing the Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance Originating in Food Animals. Risk Analysis. 2005;25:99–108.
    1. United Nations. Division for Public Administration and Development Management (DPADM), Department of Economic and Social Affaires (DESA); 2004. Republic of Uganda, Public Administration Country Profile.
    1. Makita K, Fèvre EM, Waiswa C, Bronsvoort BMDC, Eisler MC, et al. Population-dynamics focussed rapid rural mapping and characterisation of the peri-urban interface of Kampala, Uganda. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.12.003. Land Use Policy. 2010;27:888–897.
    1. Thrusfield M. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2005. Veterinary Epidemiology Third Edition.
    1. Thrusfield MV, Ortega C, de Blas I, Noordhuizen JP, Frankena K. WINEPISCOPE2.0 Improved epidemiological software for veterinary medicine. Vet Rec. 2001;148:567–572.
    1. Gall D, Nielsen K. Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: a review of test performance and cost comparison. Rev Sci Tech (Off Int Epizoot) 2004;23:989–1002.
    1. Portanti O, Tittarelli M, Di Febo T, Luciani M, Mercante MT, et al. Development and Validation of a Competitive ELISA Kit for the Serological Diagnosis of Ovine, Caprine and Bovine Brucellosis. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006;53:494–8.
    1. Rivera DY, Rueda OE, Calderon CP, Marino OC, Gall D, et al. Comparative evaluation of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay in milk for the detection of cattle infected with Brucella abortus, in herds located in the province of Cundinamarca, Colombia. Rev Sci Tech (Off Int Epizoot) 2003;22:1065–1075.
    1. Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Abstract 2005 2005.
    1. Nero L, de Mattos MR, de Aquiar FBM, Ortolani MB, Beloti V, et al. Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. in raw milk produced in Brazil: Occurrence and interference of indigenous microbiota in their isolation and development. Zoonoses and Public Health. 2008;55:299–305.
    1. Heuvelink AE, van Heerwaarden C, Zwartkruis-Nahuis A, Tilburg JJ, Bos MH, et al. Two outbreaks of campylobacteriosis associated with the consumption of raw cow's milk. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;134:70–4.
    1. Eyer JM. The epidemiology of milk borne-scarlet fever: the case of Edwardian Brighton. American Journal of Public Health. 1986;76:573–584.
    1. Guatteo R, Beaudeau F, Joly A, Seegers H. Coxiella burnetii shedding by dairy cows. Veterinary Research. 2007;38:849–860.
    1. European Food Safety Authority. EFSA issues scientific advice on Q fever, New Story 12 may 2010, EFSA website. 2010 .
    1. Collins CH, Grange JM. Zoonotic implication of Mycobacterium bovis infection. Irish Veterinary Journal. 1987;41:363–366.
    1. Ellis F, Sumberg J. Food production: Urban areas and policy responses. World Dev. 1998;26:213–225.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe