How new subscribers use cancer-related online mailing lists

Barbara K Rimer, Elizabeth J Lyons, Kurt M Ribisl, J Michael Bowling, Carol E Golin, Michael J Forlenza, Andrea Meier, Barbara K Rimer, Elizabeth J Lyons, Kurt M Ribisl, J Michael Bowling, Carol E Golin, Michael J Forlenza, Andrea Meier

Abstract

Background: Online cancer-related support is an under-studied resource that may serve an important function in the information seeking, care, and support of cancer patients and their families. With over 9.8 million cancer survivors (defined as anyone living with cancer) in the United States alone and the number growing worldwide, it is important to understand how they seek and use online resources to obtain the information they need, when they need it, and in a form and manner appropriate to them. These are stated cancer communication goals of the US National Cancer Institute.

Objectives: Our purposes are to (1) present background information about online mailing lists and electronic support groups, (2) describe the rationale and methodology for the Health eCommunities (HeC) study, and (3) present preliminary baseline data on new subscribers to cancer-related mailing lists. In particular, we describe subscribers' use of mailing lists, their reasons for using them, and their reactions to participating shortly after joining the lists.

Methods: From April to August 2004, we invited all new subscribers to 10 Association of Cancer Online Resources mailing lists to complete Web-based surveys. We analyzed baseline data from the respondents to examine their perceptions about cancer-related mailing lists and to describe how cancer patients and survivors used these lists in the period shortly after joining them.

Results: Cumulative email invitations were sent to 1368 new mailing list subscribers; 293 Web surveys were completed within the allotted time frame (21.4% response rate). Most respondents were over age 50 (n = 203, 72%), white (n = 286, 98%), college graduates (n = 161, 55%), and had health insurance (n = 283, 97%). About 41% (n = 116) of new subscribers reported spending 1 to 3 hours per day reading and responding to list messages. They used the mailing lists for several reasons. Among the most frequently reported, 62% (n = 179) strongly agreed they used mailing lists to obtain information on how to deal with cancer, 42% (n = 121) strongly agreed they used mailing lists for support, and 37% (n = 109) strongly agreed that they were on the mailing lists to help others. Smaller proportions of new subscribers strongly agreed that others on the mailing lists had similar cancer experiences (n = 23, 9%), that they could relate to the experiences of others on the lists (n = 66, 27%), and that others on the list gave them good ideas about how to cope with cancer (n = 66, 27%).

Conclusions: Cancer-related online mailing lists appear to be an important resource, especially for information seeking but also for support of cancer survivors. These were the primary motivators most members reported for joining mailing lists. The modest proportion of subscribers who strongly agreed that they could relate to others' cancer experiences (as well as similar responses to other process questions) is undoubtedly due at least in part to the short duration that these subscribers were involved with the mailing lists. Emerging data, including our own, suggest that mailing lists are perhaps under-used by minority patients/survivors. These preliminary data add to a growing body of research on health-related online communities, of which online mailing lists are one variant.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ACOR home page
Figure 2
Figure 2
Project flow

References

    1. Demographics of Internet users, authors. Pew Internet & American Life Project. [2004 Jul 12]. .
    1. Cole J, Suman M, Schramm P, Lunn R, Aquino J. The UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future, Year 3. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Communication Policy; 2003. [2004 Jun 18].
    1. Lenhart Amanda, Horrigan J, Rainie L, Allen K, Boyce A, Madden M, et al. Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look at Internet Access and the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2003. Oct 1, [2004 Sep 2]. .
    1. Harris Interactive, authors. No Significant Change in the Number of "Cyberchondriacs" - Those Who Go Online for Health Care Information. [2004 Jul 12]. .
    1. Diaz Joseph A, Griffith Rebecca A, Ng James J, Reinert Steven E, Friedmann Peter D, Moulton Anne W. Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Mar;17(3):180–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x.jgi10603
    1. Baker Laurence, Wagner Todd H, Singer Sara, Bundorf M Kate. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003 May 14;289(18):2400–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400. .289/18/2400
    1. Eysenbach Gunther, Köhler Christian. Health-related searches on the Internet. JAMA. 2004 Jun 23;291(24):2946. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.24.2946.291/24/2946
    1. Phillipov George, Phillips Patrick J. Frequency of health-related search terms on the Internet. JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2258–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.17.2258.290/17/2258
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cancer survivorship--United States, 1971-2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Jun 25;53(24):526–9. .mm5324a3
    1. The Nation's Investment in Cancer Research: A Plan and Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 2005. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2003. [2004 Sep 2]. .
    1. Levy Judith A, Strombeck Rita. Health benefits and risks of the Internet. J Med Syst. 2002 Dec;26(6):495–510. doi: 10.1023/A:1020288508362.
    1. Horrigan JB, Rainie L. Getting serious online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2002.
    1. Eysenbach Gunther, Powell John, Englesakis Marina, Rizo Carlos, Stern Anita. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166. .328/7449/1166
    1. Lieberman MA, Russo S. Self help groups and the Internet: breast cancer newsgroups. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care. 2001;1(4):323–344. doi: 10.2190/EGWJ-GBQD-KPDA-7UUD.
    1. Winzelberg Andrew J, Classen Catherine, Alpers Georg W, Roberts Heidi, Koopman Cheryl, Adams Robert E, Ernst Heidemarie, Dev Parvati, Taylor C Barr. Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer. 2003 Mar 1;97(5):1164–73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11174.
    1. Meier A. Technology-mediated group work. In: Garvin Charles D, Galinsky Maeda J, Gutierrez Lorraine M., editors. Handbook of Social Work with Groups. New York: Guilford Publications; 2004. pp. 477–493.
    1. Patterson TL, Shaw WS, Masys DR. Improving health through computer self-help programs: theory and practice. In: Brennan PF, Schneider SF, Tornquist E, editors. Information Networks for Community Health. New York: Springer; 1997. pp. 219–246.
    1. Wright KB, Bell SB. Health-related support groups on the Internet: linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. J Health Psychol. 2003;8(1):39–54. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001429.
    1. Fernsler J I, Manchester L J. Evaluation of a computer-based cancer support network. Cancer Pract. 1997;5(1):46–51.
    1. Taenzer P, Zendel I, Birdsell JM, McGregor SE, Freiwald S. Cancer, me??: health care advice goes online. In: Brennan PF, Schneider SF, Tornquist E, editors. Information Networks for cCommunity Health. New York: Springer; 1997. pp. 205–218.
    1. Ziebland Sue, Chapple Alison, Dumelow Carol, Evans Julie, Prinjha Suman, Rozmovits Linda. How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.564. .328/7439/564
    1. White M, Dorman S M. Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health Educ Res. 2001 Dec;16(6):693–707. doi: 10.1093/her/16.6.693.
    1. Osheroff J A. Online, health-related discussion groups: what we should know and do. J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Aug;12(8):511–2. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00093.x.
    1. Shaw B R, Mctavish F, Hawkins R, Gustafson D H, Pingree S. Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. J Health Commun. 2000;5(2):135–59. doi: 10.1080/108107300406866.
    1. Klaw E, Huebsch PD, Humphreys K. Communication patterns in an on-line mutual help group for problem drinkers. J Community Psychol. 2000;28(5):535–546. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(200009)28:5<535::AID-JCOP7>;2-0.
    1. Neuhauser L, Kreps GL. Rethinking communication in the e-health era. J Health Psychol. 2003;8(1):7–24. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001426.
    1. Glasgow Russell E, Boles Shawn M, Mckay H Garth, Feil Edward G, Barrera Manuel. The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. Prev Med. 2003 Apr;36(4):410–9. doi: 10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00056-7.S0091743502000567
    1. Ferguson Tom, Frydman Gilles. The first generation of e-patients. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1148–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1148. .328/7449/1148
    1. Salem DA, Bogar GA, Reid C. Mutual help goes online. J Community Psychol. 1997;25(2):189–207. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199703)25:2<189::AID-JCOP7>;2-T.
    1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, authors. Impact of Health on Health Behavior Change: Empirical Literature Review. West Kingston, RI: Pro-Change Behavior Systems; 2001.
    1. Christensen Helen, Griffiths Kathleen M, Korten Ailsa. Web-based cognitive behavior therapy: analysis of site usage and changes in depression and anxiety scores. J Med Internet Res. 2002 Feb 15;4(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.1.e3. <ARTICLE_ID/>
    1. Houston Thomas K, Cooper Lisa A, Ford Daniel E. Internet support groups for depression: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;159(12):2062–8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.12.2062. .
    1. Lieberman Morton A, Golant Mitch, Giese-Davis Janine, Winzlenberg Andy, Benjamin Harold, Humphreys Keith, Kronenwetter Carol, Russo Stefani, Spiegel David. Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer. 2003 Feb 15;97(4):920–5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11145.
    1. Lorig Kate R, Laurent Diana D, Deyo Richard A, Marnell Margaret E, Minor Marian A, Ritter Philip L. Can a back pain e-mail discussion group improve health status and lower health care costs?: a randomized study. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Apr 8;162(7):792–6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.7.792.ioi10219
    1. Fleisher Linda, Bass Sarah, Ruzek Sheryl Burt, McKeown-Conn Nancy. Relationships among Internet health information use, patient behavior and self efficacy in newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's NCI Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service (CIS) Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:260–4.D020002265
    1. Gustafson DH, Julesberg KE, Stengle WA, McTavish FM, Hawkins RP. Assessing costs and outcomes of providing computer support to underserved women with breast cancer. Electronic Journal of Communication. 2001;11(3-4)
    1. Gustafson D H, Hawkins R, Pingree S, Mctavish F, Arora N K, Mendenhall J, Cella D F, Serlin R C, Apantaku F M, Stewart J, Salner A. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jul;16(7):435–45. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x.jgi00332
    1. White M H, Dorman S M. Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(4):168–76; quiz 177-9.
    1. Finn J, Lavitt M. Computer-based self-help groups for sexual abuse survivors. Soc Work Groups. 1994;17(1/2):21–46.
    1. Culver J D, Gerr F, Frumkin H. Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board. J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Aug;12(8):466–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00084.x.
    1. Lamberg Lynne. Online empathy for mood disorders: patients turn to internet support groups. JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3073–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3073.289/23/3073
    1. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health, authors. Wired for Health and Well-Being: The Emergence of Interactive Health Communication (017-001-00541-0) Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1999.
    1. Murray Elizabeth, Lo Bernard, Pollack Lance, Donelan Karen, Catania Joe, White Martha, Zapert Kinga, Turner Rachel. The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1727–34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1727.163/14/1727
    1. Wenzel L, Glanz K, Lerman C. Stress, coping and health behavior. In: Glanz Karen, Rimer Barbara K, Lewis Frances Marcus., editors. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003. pp. 210–239.
    1. Wenzel Lari B, Donnelly James P, Fowler Jeffery M, Habbal Rana, Taylor Thomas H, Aziz Noreen, Cella David. Resilience, reflection, and residual stress in ovarian cancer survivorship: a gynecologic oncology group study. Psychooncology. 2002;11(2):142–53.10.1002/pon.567
    1. Penedo Frank J, Gonzalez Jeffrey S, Davis Catherine, Dahn Jason, Antoni Michael H, Ironson Gail, Malow Robert, Schneiderman Neil. Coping and psychological distress among symptomatic HIV+ men who have sex with men. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25(3):203–13. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2503_06.
    1. Brennan J. Adjustment to cancer - coping or personal transition? Psychooncology. 2001;10(1):1–18. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<1::AID-PON484>;2-K.10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<1::AID-PON484>;2-T
    1. Lazarus Richard S, Folkman Susan. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1984. Nov 1,
    1. Fleishman J A, Sherbourne C D, Crystal S, Collins R L, Marshall G N, Kelly M, Bozzette S A, Shapiro M F, Hays R D. Coping, conflictual social interactions, social support, and mood among HIV-infected persons. HCSUS Consortium. Am J Community Psychol. 2000 Aug;28(4):421–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1005132430171.
    1. Shapiro S L, Lopez A M, Schwartz G E, Bootzin R, Figueredo A J, Braden C J, Kurker S F. Quality of life and breast cancer: relationship to psychosocial variables. J Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;57(4):501–19. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1026.10.1002/jclp.1026
    1. Yammarino FJ, Skinner S, Childers TL. Understanding mail survey response behavior. Public Opin Q. 1991;55(4):613–639. doi: 10.1086/269284.
    1. Sheehan KB, Hoy MG. Proceedings of the 1997 Conference of the American Academy of Advertisers. 1997. E-mail surveys: response patterns, process and potential.
    1. National Cancer Institute, authors. Health Information National Trends Survey Instrument. [2003 Sep 1]. .
    1. King SA. Researching Internet communities: proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society. 1996;12(2):119–128.
    1. Fogel Joshua, Albert Steven M, Schnabel Freya, Ditkoff Beth Ann, Neugut Alfred I. Racial/ethnic differences and potential psychological benefits in use of the internet by women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2003 Mar;12(2):107–17. doi: 10.1002/pon.617.
    1. Mctavish FM, Pingree S, Hawkins R, Gustafson D. Cultural differences in use of an electronic discussion group. J Health Psychol. 2003;8(1):105–117. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001447.
    1. Klemm Paula, Bunnell Dyane, Cullen Maureen, Soneji Rachna, Gibbons Patricia, Holecek Andrea. Online cancer support groups: a review of the research literature. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(3):136–42. doi: 10.1097/00024665-200305000-00010.
    1. Schmidt John E, Andrykowski Michael A. The role of social and dispositional variables associated with emotional processing in adjustment to breast cancer: an internet-based study. Health Psychol. 2004 May;23(3):259–66. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.259.2004-13299-005
    1. Kraut Robert, Olson Judith, Banaji Mahzarin, Bruckman Amy, Cohen Jeffrey, Couper Mick. Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. Am Psychol. 2004;59(2):105–17. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105.2004-11287-003
    1. Schonlau M, Fricker RD, Elliott MN RAND Corporation, authors. Conducting Research Surveys via E-mail and the Web. [2004 Sep 2].
    1. Northouse L L, Caffey M, Deichelbohrer L, Schmidt L, Guziatek-trojniak L, West S, Kershaw T, Mood D. The quality of life of African American women with breast cancer. Res Nurs Health. 1999 Dec;22(6):449–60. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199912)22:6<435::AID-NUR3>;2-N.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe