Assessment of Vascular Event Prevention and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults With Preexisting Vascular Disease or Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Alison Offer, Matthew Arnold, Robert Clarke, Derrick Bennett, Louise Bowman, Richard Bulbulia, Richard Haynes, Jing Li, Jemma C Hopewell, Martin Landray, Jane Armitage, Rory Collins, Sarah Parish, Heart Protection Study (HPS), Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH), and Treatment of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-THRIVE) Collaborative Grou, Alison Offer, Matthew Arnold, Robert Clarke, Derrick Bennett, Louise Bowman, Richard Bulbulia, Richard Haynes, Jing Li, Jemma C Hopewell, Martin Landray, Jane Armitage, Rory Collins, Sarah Parish, Heart Protection Study (HPS), Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH), and Treatment of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-THRIVE) Collaborative Grou

Abstract

Importance: Acquisition of reliable randomized clinical trial evidence of the effects of cardiovascular interventions on cognitive decline is a priority.

Objectives: To estimate the association of cognitive aging with the avoidance of vascular events in cardiovascular intervention trials and understand whether reports of nonsignificant results exclude worthwhile benefit.

Design, setting, and participants: This secondary analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials in participants with preexisting occlusive vascular disease or diabetes included survivors to final in-trial follow-up in the Heart Protection Study (HPS), Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH), and Treatment of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-THRIVE) trials of lipid modification for prevention of cardiovascular events. Data were collected from February 1994 through January 2013 and analyzed from January 2015 through December 2018.

Exposures: Incident vascular events and diabetes and statin therapy.

Main outcomes and measures: Cognitive function was assessed at the end of a mean (SD) of 4.9 (1.5) years of follow-up using a 14-item verbal test. Associations of the incidence of vascular events and new-onset diabetes during the trials, with cognitive function at final in-trial follow-up were estimated and expressed as years of cognitive aging (using the association of the score with age >60 years). The benefit on cognitive aging mediated through the effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels on events was estimated by applying these findings to nonfatal event differences observed with statin therapy in the HPS trial.

Results: Among 45 029 participants undergoing cognitive assessment, mean (SD) age was 67.9 (8.0) years; 80.7% were men. Incident stroke (n = 1197) was associated with 7.1 (95% CI, 5.7-8.5) years of cognitive aging; incident transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and new-onset diabetes were associated with 1 to 2 years of cognitive aging. In HPS, randomization to statin therapy for 5 years resulted in 2.0% of survivors avoiding a nonfatal stroke or transient ischemic attack and 2.4% avoiding a nonfatal cardiac event, which yielded an expected reduction in cognitive aging of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.11-0.19) years. With 15 926 participants undergoing cognitive assessment, HPS had 80% power to detect a 1-year (ie, 20% during the 5 years) difference in cognitive aging.

Conclusions and relevance: The expected cognitive benefits of the effects of preventive therapies on cardiovascular events during even the largest randomized clinical trials may have been too small to be detectable. Hence, nonsignificant findings may not provide good evidence of a lack of worthwhile benefit on cognitive function with prolonged use of such therapies.

Trial registration: isrctn.com and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: ISRCTN48489393, ISRCTN74348595, and NCT00461630.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Offer, Arnold, Bennett, Haynes, and Parish reported receiving grants from the Medical Research Council (MRC), the British Heart Foundation (BHF), Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Merck, and Roche during the conduct of the study. Dr Clarke reported receiving grants from the MRC, the BHF, Merck, and Roche during the conduct of the study. Dr Bowman reported receiving grants from the MRC and the BHF during the conduct of the study and grants from Merck outside the submitted work. Dr Bulbulia reported receiving grants from the MRC during the conduct of the study. Dr Hopewell reported receiving grants from the BHF, the MRC, CRUK, Merck, and Roche during the conduct of the study and grants from Merck and the Medicines Company (MEDCO) outside the submitted work. Dr Landray reported receiving grants from the MRC, the BHF, CRUK, Merck, Roche, and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre during the conduct of the study and grants from MEDCO, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Armitage reported receiving grants from the MRC, the BHF, CRUK, and Merck during the conduct of the study and grants from Bayer, Solvay, Abbott, Alzheimers’ Research UK, MEDCO, the BHF, and the NIHR outside the submitted work. Dr Collins reported receiving grants and personal fees from the BHF and from UKBIOBANK during the conduct of the study and grants from CRUK, the MRC, Merck, the NIHR, Wellcome Trust, Pfizer, and MEDCO during the conduct of the study. In addition, Drs Collins and Parish reported having a patent for a statin-related myopathy genetic test issued and licensed, with royalties paid to University of Oxford and the MRC, from Boston Heart Diagnostics (Drs Collins and Parish have waived any personal reward). No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Mean Cognitive Function z Score…
Figure 1.. Mean Cognitive Function z Score by Age and Study Cohort
Analyses are adjusted for age, sex, and baseline disease. In participants older than 60 years, the overall mean cognitive function was 4.0% (SE, 0.1%) of an SD lower per year of age, as shown by the diagonal solid line. The corresponding percentages in the separate cohorts were 3.6% (SE, 0.2%) SD in the Heart Protection Study (HPS), 4.4% (SE, 0.2%) SD in the Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH), 4.2% (SE, 0.2%) SD in the European cohort of the Treatment of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-THRIVE), and 4.0% (SE, 0.1%) SD in the Chinese cohort of HPS2-THRIVE. Whiskers represent 95% CIs.
Figure 2.. Cognitive Aging Associated With Nonfatal…
Figure 2.. Cognitive Aging Associated With Nonfatal Incident Events
Among 45 029 participants in the Heart Protection Study (HPS), Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH), and Treatment of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events trials, analyses were adjusted for age, sex, baseline disease, randomized treatment allocation, duration in study, and the baseline risk factors associated with cognitive function in each trial.

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(9995):-. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4
    1. Schneider JA, Aggarwal NT, Barnes L, Boyle P, Bennett DA. The neuropathology of older persons with and without dementia from community versus clinic cohorts. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;18(3):691-701. doi:10.3233/JAD-2009-1227
    1. Qiu C, Fratiglioni L. A major role for cardiovascular burden in age-related cognitive decline. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(5):267-277. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.223
    1. Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Brayne C. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):788-794. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70136-X
    1. Umegaki H. Dementia: type 2 diabetes has a slow and insidious effect on cognition. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(3):127-128. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.17
    1. Iadecola C, Yaffe K, Biller J, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Hypertension; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Stroke Council . Impact of hypertension on cognitive function: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2016;68(6):e67-e94. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000053
    1. Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, et al. . Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016;388(10059):2532-2561. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5
    1. ISRCTN Registry. Heart Protection Study. ISRCTN48489393. . Accessed January 23, 2019.
    1. ISRCTN Registry. Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine. ISRCTN74348595. . Accessed January 23, 2019.
    1. Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events HPS2-THRIVE (HPS2-THRIVE). NCT00461630. . Accessed January 23, 2019.
    1. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9326):7-22. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3
    1. Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH) Collaborative Group Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol with 80 mg versus 20 mg simvastatin daily in 12,064 survivors of myocardial infarction: a double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1658-1669. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60310-8
    1. HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(3):203-212.
    1. Prince MJ, Macdonald AM, Sham PC, Richards M, Quraishi S, Horn I. The development and initial validation of a telephone-administered cognitive test battery (TACT). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1999;8(1):49-57. doi:10.1002/mpr.56
    1. Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, et al. . Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet. 2010;375(9716):735-742. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61965-6
    1. Efron B. The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. . Accessed December 12, 2018.
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670-1681. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5
    1. Jukema JW, Cannon CP, de Craen AJ, Westendorp RG, Trompet S. The controversies of statin therapy: weighing the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(10):875-881. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.007
    1. Levi Marpillat N, Macquin-Mavier I, Tropeano AI, Bachoud-Levi AC, Maison P. Antihypertensive classes, cognitive decline and incidence of dementia: a network meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2013;31(6):1073-1082. doi:10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283603f53
    1. Price JF, Stewart MC, Deary IJ, et al. ; AAA Trialists . Low dose aspirin and cognitive function in middle aged to elderly adults: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;337:a1198. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1198
    1. Vermeer SE, Longstreth WT Jr, Koudstaal PJ. Silent brain infarcts: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(7):611-619. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70170-9
    1. Johnston SC, Fayad PB, Gorelick PB, et al. . Prevalence and knowledge of transient ischemic attack among US adults. Neurology. 2003;60(9):1429-1434. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000063309.41867.0F
    1. Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S, et al. . Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(5):455-532. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00062-4
    1. Clarke R, Bennett D, Parish S, et al. ; B-Vitamin Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration . Effects of homocysteine lowering with B vitamins on cognitive aging: meta-analysis of 11 trials with cognitive data on 22,000 individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(2):657-666. doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.076349
    1. Cambridge Cognition. CANTAB: the most sensitive and validated cognitive research software available.
    1. Giugliano RP, Sabatine MS, Ott BR. Cognitive function in a randomized trial of evolocumab. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1997.
    1. Lyall DM, Cullen BD, Allerhand M, et al. . Cognitive test scores in UK Biobank: data reduction in 480,416 participants and longitudinal stability in 20,346 participants. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0154222. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154222
    1. Ritchie K, de Roquefeuil G, Ritchie Craig W, et al. . COGNITO: computerized assessment of information processing. J Psychol Psychother. 2014;4:136. doi:10.4172/2161-0487.1000136

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe