Effects of HEPA air cleaners on unscheduled asthma visits and asthma symptoms for children exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke

Bruce P Lanphear, Richard W Hornung, Jane Khoury, Kimberly Yolton, Michelle Lierl, Amy Kalkbrenner, Bruce P Lanphear, Richard W Hornung, Jane Khoury, Kimberly Yolton, Michelle Lierl, Amy Kalkbrenner

Abstract

Objective: The goal was to test the effects of high-efficiency, particulate-arresting (HEPA) air cleaners on unscheduled asthma visits and symptoms among children with asthma exposed to secondhand smoke.

Methods: We enrolled 225 eligible children who were 6 to 12 years of age, had physician-diagnosed asthma, and were exposed to ≥5 cigarettes per day. We conducted a double-blind, randomized trial. Children were assigned randomly to receive 2 active or inactive HEPA air cleaners.

Results: Of 225 enrolled children, 110 (49%) were assigned to the intervention group and 115 (51%) to the control group; 215 (95%) completed the trial. During the trial, there were 42 fewer unscheduled asthma visits among children in the intervention group (18.5% [95% confidence interval: 1.25%-82.75%]; P = .043), compared with those in the control group, after adjustment for baseline differences. There was a significant difference in the reductions of levels of particles of >0.3 μm according to group assignment; there was a 25% reduction in particle levels in the intervention group, compared with a 5% reduction in the control group (P = .026). There were no significant differences in parent-reported asthma symptoms, exhaled nitric-oxide levels, air nicotine levels, or cotinine levels according to group assignment.

Conclusions: These results hold promise for using HEPA air cleaners as part of a multifaceted strategy to reduce asthma morbidity, but further research is necessary before they can be recommended routinely for the medical management of asthma.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00006565.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Enrollment, random assignment, and retention of Cincinnati Asthma Prevention study participants.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean numbers of unscheduled asthma visits in the previous 3 months, reported at quarterly intervals during the trial, according to group assignment, with adjustment for differences in the numbers of unscheduled asthma visits at baseline. The solid line and closed circles indicate the intervention group; dashed line and open circles, control group.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe