Study protocol: Couples Partnering for Lipid Enhancing Strategies (CouPLES) - a randomized, controlled trial

Corrine I Voils, William S Yancy Jr, Stacey Kovac, Cynthia J Coffman, Morris Weinberger, Eugene Z Oddone, Amy Jeffreys, Santanu Datta, Hayden B Bosworth, Corrine I Voils, William S Yancy Jr, Stacey Kovac, Cynthia J Coffman, Morris Weinberger, Eugene Z Oddone, Amy Jeffreys, Santanu Datta, Hayden B Bosworth

Abstract

Background: Almost 50% of Americans have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The behaviors required to lower LDL-C levels may be difficult to adhere to if they are inconsistent with spouses' health practices, and, alternatively, may be enhanced by enlisting support from the spouse. This trial extends previous trials by requiring spouse enrollment, teaching spouses how to provide emotional and instrumental support, allowing patients to decide which component of the intervention they would like to receive, and having patients determine their own goals and action plans.

Methods: Veteran outpatients with above-goal LDL-C (N = 250) and their spouses are randomized, as a couple, to receive printed education materials only or the materials plus an 11-month, nurse-delivered, telephone-based intervention. The intervention contains four modules: medication adherence, diet, exercise, and patient-physician communication. Patients decide which modules they complete and in which order; modules may be repeated or omitted. Telephone calls are to patients and spouses separately and occur monthly. During each patient telephone call, patients' progress is reviewed, and patients create goals and action plans for the upcoming month. During spouse telephone calls, which occur within one week of patient calls, spouses are informed of patients' goals and action plans and devise strategies to increase emotional and instrumental support.The primary outcome is patients' LDL-C, measured at baseline, 6 months, and 11 months. Linear mixed models will be used to test the primary hypothesis that an 11-month, telephone-based patient-spouse intervention will result in a greater reduction in LDL-C as compared to printed education materials. Various process measures, including social support, self-efficacy, medication adherence, dietary behavior, and exercise, are also assessed to explain any change, or lack thereof, in LDL-C.

Discussion: Given the social context in which self-management occurs, interventions that teach spouses to provide instrumental and emotional support may help patients initiate and adhere to behaviors that lower their LDL-C levels. Moreover, allowing patients to retain autonomy by deciding which behaviors they would like to change and how may improve adherence and clinical outcomes.

Trial registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number is NCT00321789.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps in identifying potentially eligible patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention flowchart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient telephone script from diet application.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Spouse telephone script from diet application.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Patient goals from intervention delivery application.

References

    1. American Heart Association. Dallas, TX; 2003. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2003 update.
    1. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2001.
    1. Brookhart MA, Patrick AR, Schneeweiss S, Avorn J, Dormuth C, Shrank W, van Wijk BLG, Cadarette SM, Canning CF, Solomon DH. Physician follow-up and provider continuity are associated with long-term medication adherence: A study of the dynamics of statin use. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:847–852. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.8.847.
    1. Sherman AM, Bowen DJ, Vitolins M, Perri MG, Rosal MC, Sevick MA, Ockene JK. Dietary adherence: Characteristics and interventions. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:206S–11S. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00080-5.
    1. Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:170–95. doi: 10.1177/1090198102251030.
    1. Carmody T, Fey S, Pierce D, Connor W, Matarazzo J. Behavioral treatment of hyperlipidemia: Techniques, results, and future directions. J Beh Med. 1982;5:91–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00845259.
    1. McLean N, Griffin S, Toney K, Hardeman W. Family involvement in weight control, weight maintenance and weight-loss interventions: A systematic review of randomised trials. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:987–1005. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802383.
    1. Martire L, Lustig A, Schulz R, Miller G, Helgeson V. Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychol. 2004;23:599–611. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.599.
    1. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, Kerner JF, Sistrunk S, Gersh BJ, Dube R, Taleghani CK, Burke JE, Williams S, Eisenberg JM, Escarce JJ. The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:618–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902253400806.
    1. Black D, Lantz C. Spouse involvement and a possible long-term follow-up trap in weight loss. Behav Res Ther. 1984;22:557–562. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(84)90059-7.
    1. Pearce J, LeBow M, Orchard J. Role of spouse involvement in the behavioral treatment of overweight women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981;49:236–44. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.49.2.236.
    1. Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon S, Hebert P, Fiebach NH, Eberlein KA, Godwin J, Qizilbash N, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet. 1990;335:827–38. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90944-Z.
    1. Prochaska J, Redding C, Evers K. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, editor. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1997. pp. 99–120.
    1. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288:2469–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2469.
    1. Baker R. Minority distrust of medicine: a historical perspective. Mt Sinai J Med. 1999;66:212–22.
    1. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:156–63. doi: 10.1002/art.10993.
    1. Nutrition Quest Block Brief 2000 Food Frequency Questionnaire. 2000.
    1. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, Sobel DS, Brown BW, Jr, Bandura A, Gonzalez VM, Laurent DD, Holman HR. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care. 2001;39:1217–23. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00008.
    1. Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM, Bray GA, Delahanty L, Hoskin M, Kriska AM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Pi-Sunyer X, Regensteiner J, Venditti B, Wylie-Rosett J. Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2102–7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0560.
    1. McCann BS, Bovbjerg VE, Brief DJ, Turner C, Follette WC, Fitzpatrick V, Dowdy A, Retzlaff B, Walden CE, Knopp RH. Relationship of self-efficacy to cholesterol lowering and dietary change in hyperlipidemia. Ann Beh Med. 1995;17:221–226. doi: 10.1007/BF02903916.
    1. Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987;16:825–36. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3.
    1. Davis KE, Todd MJ. Friendship and love relationships. In: Davis KE, Mitchell TO, editor. Advances in descriptive psychology 2 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1982. pp. 79–112.
    1. Verbeke G, Molenbergh G. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
    1. MacKinnon D, Lockwood C, Hoffman J, West S, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:83–104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83.
    1. Long SD, O'Brien K, MacDonald KGJ, Leggett-Frazier N, Swanson MS, Pories WJ, Caro JF. Weight loss in severely obese subjects prevents the progression of impaired glucose tolerance to type II diabetes. A longitudinal interventional study. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:372–375. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.5.372.
    1. Sikand G, Kashyap ML, Wong ND, Hsu JC. Dietitian intervention improves lipid values and saves medication costs in men with combined hyperlipidemia and a history of niacin noncompliance. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:218–24. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00066-3.
    1. Henkin Y, Garber DW, Osterlund LC, Darnell BE. Saturated fats, cholesterol, and dietary compliance. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1167–74. doi: 10.1001/archinte.152.6.1167.
    1. McBride CM, Rimer BK. Using the telephone to improve health behavior and health service delivery. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:3–18. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00098-6.
    1. Weinberger M, Tierney WM, Cowper PA, Katz BP, Booher PA. Cost-effectiveness of increased telephone contact for patients with osteoarthritis. A randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:243–6.
    1. D'Agostino RB, Sr, Grundy S, Sullivan LM, Wilson P. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. JAMA. 2001;286:180–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.2.180.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe