Post-dural Puncture Headache: A Comparison Between Median and Paramedian Approaches in Orthopedic Patients

Faramarz Mosaffa, Khodamorad Karimi, Firooz Madadi, Seyyed Hasan Khoshnevis, Laleh Daftari Besheli, Alireza Eajazi, Faramarz Mosaffa, Khodamorad Karimi, Firooz Madadi, Seyyed Hasan Khoshnevis, Laleh Daftari Besheli, Alireza Eajazi

Abstract

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is an iatrogenic complication of spinal anesthesia. Reported risk factors for PDPH include sex, age, pregnancy, needle tip shape and size, bevel orientation, approach and others. Little is known regarding the effect of different approaches on the incidence of PDPH.

Objectives: In this study we aimed to compare the incidence of PDPH in the case of median and paramedian approaches in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for orthopedic operations.

Patients and methods: Patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia between 2007 and 2008 were studied in a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. The patients were randomized to receive spinal anesthesia by either a median (n = 75) or paramedian (n = 75) approach through a 25-gauge Crawford needle. No premedication was given, and all patients received 500 mL of normal saline intravenously and 4 mL of 0.5% isobaric Marcaine 30 minutes prior to surgery in both approaches.

Results: Fifteen patients (10%) developed PDPH. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PDPH in both groups, with 7 (9.3%) patients in the median approach group versus 8 (10.7%) in the paramedian approach group developing typical PDPH (P = 0.875). However, a significant difference in PDPH incidence (P = 0.041) was observed between females (9; 16.7%) and males (6; 6.3%).

Conclusions: There is no difference between median and paramedian approaches with respect to PDPH incidence; the paramedian approach is therefore recommended, especially for older patients with degenerative changes in the spine and intervertebral spaces and those who cannot take the proper position. Moreover, the rate of PDPH was found to be significantly higher in females than in males.

Keywords: Orthopedics; Post-dural puncture headache; Spinal anesthesia.

References

    1. Lybecker H, Moller JT, May O, Nielsen HK. Incidence and prediction of postdural puncture headache. A prospective study of 1021 spinal anesthesias. Anesth Analg. 1990;70(4):389–94. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199004000-00008.
    1. Halpern S, Preston R. Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design. Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(6):1376–83. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199412000-00012.
    1. Ross BK, Chadwick HS, Mancuso JJ, Benedetti C. Sprotte needle for obstetric anesthesia: decreased incidence of post dural puncture headache. Reg Anesth. 1992;17(1):29–33.
    1. Tarkkila PJ, Heine H, Tervo RR. Comparison of Sprotte and Quincke needles with respect to post dural puncture headache and backache. Reg Anesth. 1992;17(5):283–7.
    1. Janik R, Dick W. [Post spinal headache. Its incidence following the median and paramedian techniques]. Anaesthesist. 1992;41(3):137–41.
    1. Naulty JS, Hertwig L, Hunt CO, Datta S, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB. Influence of local anesthetic solution on postdural puncture headache. Anesthesiology. 1990;72(3):450–4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199003000-00010.
    1. Shnider SM, Levinson G. Anesthesia for cesarean section. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1987. pp. 159–78.
    1. Grant R, Condon B, Hart I, Teasdale GM. Changes in intracranial CSF volume after lumbar puncture and their relationship to post-LP headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54(5):440–2. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.5.440.
    1. Wulf HF. The centennial of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(2):500–6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199808000-00028.
    1. Vandam LD, Dripps RD. Long-term follow-up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics; syndrome of decreased intracranial pressure (headache and ocular and auditory difficulties). J Am Med Assoc. 1956;161(7):586–91.
    1. Leeda M, Stienstra R, Arbous MS, Dahan A, Th Veering B, Burm AG, et al. Lumbar epidural catheter insertion: the midline vs. the paramedian approach. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22(11):839–42. doi: 10.1017/s0265021505001419.
    1. Blomberg RG, Jaanivald A, Walther S. Advantages of the paramedian approach for lumbar epidural analgesia with catheter technique. A clinical comparison between midline and paramedian approaches. Anaesthesia. 1989;44(9):742–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09260.x.
    1. Podder S, Kumar N, Yaddanapudi LN, Chari P. Paramedian lumbar epidural catheter insertion with patients in the sitting position is equally successful in the flexed and unflexed spine. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(6):1829–32. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000136774.99702.14. table of contents.
    1. Reid JA, Thorburn J. Headache after spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67(6):674–7.
    1. Dittmann M, Schaefer HG, Renkl F, Greve I. Spinal anaesthesia with 29 gauge Quincke point needles and post dural puncture headache in 2,378 patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38(7):691–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1994.tb03978.x.
    1. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Clinical anesthesiology. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Lange Medical Books/McGraw Hill; 1995.
    1. Ahmed T, Ullah H. Paramedian technique of spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients for hip fracture surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007;17(3):184.
    1. Ahsan-ul-Haq M, Amin S, Javaid S. Paramedian technique of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients for hip fracture surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15(3):160–1.
    1. Haider S, Butt KJ, Aziz M, Qasim M. Post Dural Puncture Headache-A Comparison Of Midline And Paramedian Approaches. Biomedica. 2005;21:90–2.
    1. Kang SB, Goodnough DE, Lee YK, Olson RA, Borshoff JA, Furlano MM, et al. Comparison of 26- and 27-G needles for spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 1992;76(5):734–8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199205000-00011.
    1. Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Simon D, Lipton RB. Epidemiology of tension-type headache. JAMA. 1998;279(5):381–3. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.5.381.
    1. Silberstein SD. Headache and female hormones: what you need to know. Curr Opin Neurol. 2001;14(3):323–33. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200106000-00010.
    1. Paulson PE, Minoshima S, Morrow TJ, Casey KL. Gender differences in pain perception and patterns of cerebral activation during noxious heat stimulation in humans. Pain. 1998;76(1-2):223–9. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00048-7.
    1. Sarlani E, Greenspan JD. Gender differences in temporal summation of mechanically evoked pain. Pain. 2002;97(1-2):163–9. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00015-5.
    1. Sarlani E, Farooq N, Greenspan JD. Gender and laterality differences in thermosensation throughout the perceptible range. Pain. 2003;106(1-2):9–18. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00211-2.
    1. Silberstein SD, Merriam GR. Physiology of the menstrual cycle. Cephalalgia. 2000;20(3):148–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00034.x.
    1. MacGregor EA, Hackshaw A. Prevalence of migraine on each day of the natural menstrual cycle. Neurology. 2004;63(2):351–3.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe