CranioSacral Therapy and Visceral Manipulation: A New Treatment Intervention for Concussion Recovery

Gail Wetzler, Melinda Roland, Sally Fryer-Dietz, Dee Dettmann-Ahern, Gail Wetzler, Melinda Roland, Sally Fryer-Dietz, Dee Dettmann-Ahern

Abstract

Background: Military service members and veterans face health issues related to traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially during combat, use of heavy equipment, and exposures to environmental hazards and explosives. There were 400,000 TBIs reported in deployed U.S. troops in 2012. Athletes are also subject to TBI. Studies have indicated that some manual therapies could be helpful for treating patients who have post-concussive syndrome. Objective: This case series report describes the effects of CranioSacral Therapy (CST), Visceral Manipulation (VM), and Neural Manipulation (NM) modalities for treating patients who have post-concussion syndrome. The goal of this study was to evaluate these effects on immobility, pain intensity, quality of life, sleep disorders, and cognition in these patients. Materials and Methods: This single-blinded case series was conducted at the Upledger Institute, in West Palm Beach, FL. The patients were 11 male retired professional football players from the National Football League and the Canadian Football League who had been medically diagnosed with post-concussion syndrome. Each participant received a morning and afternoon 2-hour session of these three specific manual therapies, which were capable of accessing and addressing the structural, vascular, and neurologic tissues of the cranium and brain-as well addressing far-reaching ramifications throughout the body following trauma. The main outcome measures were scores on the: Impact Neurocognitive Test; Dynavisiontm Test; Short Form-36 Quality of Life Survey, Headache Impact Test, Dizziness Handicap Inventory; a numeric pain rating scale; orthopedic range of motion tests (ROM); and vestibular testing. Hours of sleep were also checked. These outcome measures were registered at baseline, after treatment, and after a 3-month follow up. Results: Statistically significant differences were seen with a decrease in overall pain rating scale scores (P = 0.0448), and cervicogenic pain levels decreased (P = 0.0486). There were statistically significant increases in Dynavision Average Reaction Time (P = 0.0332), Memory Test (P = 0.0156) scores, and cervical ROM scores (P = 0.0377). Hours of sleep averaged 2 hours on the first day of treatment and increased to 4.0 hours at the end of treatment and were continuing to increase, as noted at a 3-month evaluation. Conclusions: Ten sessions of specific CST/VM/NM therapy resulted in statistically greater improvements in pain intensity, ROM, memory, cognition, and sleep in concussed patients.

Keywords: CranioSacral Therapy; Neural Manipulation; Visceral Manipulation; concussion; traumatic brain injury; treatment intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

No financial conflicts exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Concussion injuries in the military in 2012.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Anatomy illustration of the craniosacral system.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Numeric pain scale. This graph illustrates a subjective self-evaluation of a subject's overall perceived pain level. A decrease in this participant's pain was statistically significant (P = 0.0448).
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Cervical range of motion (ROM). This graph illustrates the average degree of ROM in a participant's cervical spine. Here, 0°–15° would be a low degree of movement while 40°–60° would be a high degree of motion. Statistically significant changes (P = 0.0377) occurred.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Cervicogenic pain (P = 0.0486). Manual therapy techniques for the treatment of chronic neck pain show a statistically significant decrease in this participant's pain levels.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Memory score (P = 0.0156). The Dynavision D2tm testing allows for testing sequential memory, focus, and concentration. The test utilizes three memory tests of graded complexity to increase cognitive demands quickly. Statistical analysis shows memory test scores improved significantly from pre-test to post-tests in a group average and continued to maintain this improvement throughout the 3 months that followed.
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
Visual and average reaction time (P = 0.0332). The average visual and reaction time reflects the completion of perceptual processing. While the average visual reaction time was not significant the average reaction time (motor control) showed a statistically decrease in average reaction time.
FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.
Short Form–36 (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) Survey. The SF-36 is a generic, self-administered survey of a patient's perceived health/QoL. The survey measures physical function, vitality, social function, limitations due to emotional problems, general mental health, and health transition.
FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.
Average hours of sleep per night. As fatigue and sleep deprivation consisted of 60% of the participants' chief complaints, it was possible to see an appreciable gain in sleep hours during 5 days of treatment, a gain that continued to increase in the months that followed.

References

    1. MedlinePlus. Traumatic Brain Injury. Online document at: Accessed February6, 2017
    1. Snell FI, Halter MJ. A signature wound of war: Mild traumatic brain injury. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2010;48(2):22–28
    1. Kallakuri S, Desai A, Feng K, et al. . Neuronal injury and glial changes are hallmarks of open field blast exposure in swine frontal lobe. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169239.
    1. Iverson GL. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy and risk of suicide in former athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(2):162–165
    1. Webner D, Iverson GL. Suicide in professional American football players in the past 95 years. Brain Inj. 2016;30(13–14):1718–1721
    1. Amen D, Newberg A, Thatcher R, Jim Y, Wu J, Keator D, Willeumier K. Impact of playing American professional football on long-term brain function. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23(1):98–106
    1. Giza C, Kutcher J, Ashwal S, et al. . Summary of evidence-based guideline update: Evaluation and management of concussion in sports. Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2013;80(24):2250–2257
    1. Ries E. Beyond Rest: Physical Therapists and Concussion Management. PT in Motion, March 2017:22–27. Online document at: Accessed June5, 2017
    1. Upledger JE, Vredevoogd J. Introduction to the CranioSacral concept. In: CranioSacral Therapy. Seattle, WA: Eastland Press; 1983:5–13
    1. Wanveer T. Introduction and a few key words. In: Brain Stars, 1st ed West Palm Beach, FL: Upledger Productions; 2015:1–30
    1. Nedergaard M, Rodriguiz J, Verkhratsky A. Glial calcium and diseases of the nervous system. Cell Calcium. 2010;47(2):140–149
    1. Barral JP, Mercier P. Basic Concepts. In: Visceral Manipulation. Seattle: Eastland Press; 1988:1–20
    1. Barral JP, Croibier A. Some preliminary thoughts. In: Manual Therapy for the Cranial Nerves, 1st ed London: Churchill Livingstone; 2008:1–5
    1. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. . Consensus statement on concussion in sport: The 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(5):250–258
    1. Grady MF, Master CL, Gioia GA. Concussion pathophysiology: Rationale for physical and cognitive rest. Pediatr Ann. 2012;41(9):377–382
    1. Ren Z, Iliff J, Yang L, et al. . “Hit & Run” model of closed-skull traumatic brain injury (TBI) reveals complex pattern of post-traumatic AQP4 dysregulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(6):834–845
    1. Castro-Sanchez AM, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Sanchez-Labraca N, et al. . A randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of CranioSacral therapy on pain and heart rate variability in fibromyalgia patients. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(1):25–35
    1. Blood SD. The craniosacral mechanism and the temporomandibular joint. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1986;86(8):512–519
    1. Arnadottir TS, Sigurdardottir AK. Is CranioSacral therapy effective for migraine? Tested with HIT-6 Questionnaire. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013;19(1):11–14
    1. Nourbakhsh MR, Fearon FJ. The effect of oscillating-energy manual therapy on lateral epicondylitis: A randomized, placebo-control, double-blinded study. J Hand Ther. 2008;21(1):4–13
    1. Gerdner LA, Hart LK, Zimmerman MB. Craniosacral still point technique: Exploring its effects in individuals with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008;34(3):36–45
    1. Raviv G, Shefi S, Nizani D, Achiron A. Effect of CranioSacral therapy on lower urinary tract signs and symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2009;15(2):72–75
    1. Castro-Sanchez AM, Lara-Palomo IC, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, Saavedra-Hernandez M, Perez-Marmol JM, Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME. Benefits of CranioSacral therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2016;22(8):650–657
    1. Haller H, Lauche R, Cramer H, et al. . CranioSacral therapy for the treatment of chronic neck pain: A randomized sham-controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(5):441–449
    1. Van der Kolk B. Body-Brain Connections. In: The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Penguin Books; 2014:62–64
    1. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Johnston K, et al. . Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport: The 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport Held in Zurich, November 2008. J Athl Train. 2009;44(4):434–448

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe