Evaluation of a modular scalable system for silver-ager located in assisted living homes in Austria--study protocol of the ModuLAAr ambient assisted living project

Christian Siegel, Barbara Prazak-Aram, Johannes Kropf, Michael Kundi, Thomas Dorner, Christian Siegel, Barbara Prazak-Aram, Johannes Kropf, Michael Kundi, Thomas Dorner

Abstract

Background: To cope with the upcoming demographic change, economic efforts in the European Union are undertaken to promote activities in research and development of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) solutions. As a result, a large variety of AAL products will be available in the next years. Only very few of these products are comprehensively evaluated regarding different aspects of quality of life in the target population. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of AAL on quality of life, health and technology acceptance of people at advanced age living in assisted living homes providing them the ModuLAAr Ambient Assisted Living system.

Methods/design: A treatment group of adults aged 60 years and older will be recruited within the participating assisted living homes. At baseline, the participating volunteers will report on quality of life, subjective health and sociodemographic conditions. After system installation, prospective follow-up (1, 4, 12 and 18 months) with additional reporting on technology acceptance and usability of the system will be conducted. Mixed methods data collection, linking quantitative data to interview-gathered qualitative data will be applied. Primary outcome measure will be the change in quality of life and subjective health across study duration.

Discussion: As there is currently very little evidence that AAL solutions can contribute to improved health and the particular dimensions of quality of life in elderly persons, there is a need to assess these technologies and services more carefully. This field trial seeks to investigate the most relevant aspects connected to advanced information and communication technologies and their impact on daily life of residents in assisted living conditions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02130102.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and assessment points.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The ModuLAAr Ambient Assisted Living System.

References

    1. WHO. Active Aging: A Policy Framework. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
    1. Linz K, Stula S. Demographic change in Europe - An Overview. Observatory for Sociopolitical Developements in Europe. 2010;4(1):2–10.
    1. Union E. The 2012 Ageing Report: Underlying Assumptions and Projection Methodologies, Volume 4. Economic and Financial Affairs: Brussels; 2011.
    1. Krajic K, Nowak P, Rappold E. Pflegenotstand in der mobilen Pflege. Diagnosen und Lösungsmöglichkeiten. 2005. (Wissenschaftliches Gutachten gefördert durch die Fachgruppenvereinigung Gesundheitsberufe im ÖGB).
    1. De Ruyter B, Pelgrim E. Ambient assisted-living research in carelab. Interactions. 2007;14(4):30–33.
    1. Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme - ICT for ageing well. .
    1. Röcker C. 9th Japanese-German Frontiers of Science Symposium. Potsdam: Human-Computer Interaction Center, RWTH Aachen University; 2012. Ambient Assisted Living: Chances and Challenges of Intelligent Homecare Solutions.
    1. The Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme. .
    1. ModuLAAr Project Website. .
    1. Dale O, Salo M. The helsinki declaration, research guidelines and regulations: present and future editorial aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40(7):771–772.
    1. HOMER AAL platform. .
    1. Kessler J, Denzler P, Markowitsch HJ. Mini Mental Status Examination MMSE. German Version. DT Demenz-Test: Eine Testbatterie zur Erfassung kognitiver Beeinträchtigungen im Alter. Weinheim: Beltz-Verlag; 1990.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
    1. Group T. Development of the world health organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL group. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–558.
    1. Winkler I, Matschinger H, Angermeyer MC, Group W-O. The WHOQOL-OLD; A Questionnaire for Intercultural Measuring of Quality of Life in the Elderly. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2006;56(2):63–69.
    1. Gusi N, Olivares PR, Rajendram R. The EQ-5D Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire. New York: Springer; 2010.
    1. Engel G. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136.
    1. Group TW. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL) - development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1569–1585.
    1. Karrer K, Glaser C, Clemens C, Bruder C. Technikaffinität erfassen – der Fragebogen TA-EG. Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme. 8. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme. ZMMS Spektrum. 2009;29(22):196–201.
    1. Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) .
    1. User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) .
    1. Product Reaction Cards. .
    1. McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing Soc. 2005;25(1):91–110.
    1. Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavourial impacts. Int J of Man–machine studies. 1993;38:475–487.
    1. Kuckartz U, Dresing T, Rädikesr S, Stefer C. Qualitative Evaluation - Der Einstieg in die Praxis, vol. 2. aktualisierte Aufl. Wiesbaden: VS, Verl. für Sozialwiss; 2008.
    1. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse - Grundlagen und Techniken, vol. 11, aktual., überarb. Aufl. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag; 2010.
    1. Flick U. Triangulation - Eine Einführung, Volume 3. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2011.
    1. PSP I. Exploratory Workshop. Brussels: Borschette Centre; 2009. Developing indicators and impact assessment methodologies on ict for ageing - Workshop results and major findings.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe