Ethnic differences in satisfaction and quality of life in veterans with ischemic heart disease

Andrea Ohldin, Bessie Young, Ann Derleth, Mary McDonell, Paula Diehr, Catarina Kiefe, Stephan Fihn, Andrea Ohldin, Bessie Young, Ann Derleth, Mary McDonell, Paula Diehr, Catarina Kiefe, Stephan Fihn

Abstract

Objective: To assess differences in self-reported health status and satisfaction between African-American and caucasian veterans with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

Data sources/study setting: African-American and caucasian patients enrolled in General Internal Medicine clinics at six Veteran Affairs Medical Centers.

Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline survey data from the Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Patients who responded to an initial health-screening questionnaire were sent follow-up surveys, which included the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Health Survey (SF-36), the Seattle Outpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (SOSQ), and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).

Principal findings: Of the 44,965 patients approached, 27,977 (62%) returned the baseline survey, of which 10,385 patients reported IHD and were sent the SAQ. Of those, 7,985 patients (84% caucasian, 16% African-American) responded. Caucasian respondents tended to be older, married, nonsmokers, with annual incomes over dollar 10,000, and had higher educational attainment than African Americans. African-American patients reported significantly fewer cardiac procedures (33% vs. 52%, p < 0.001) but were more likely to have diabetes (37% vs. 28%, p < 0.001) and hypertension (81% vs. 68%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, clinic site, and site-ethnicity interactions, SF-36 scores for physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and vitality were greater for African Americans than caucasians, while adjusted scores were significantly lower for role emotional. However, because of the site-ethnicity interaction, scores varied significantly by site. For the SAQ, overall adjusted physical function summary scores and disease stability scores were significantly greater for African Americans than caucasians. Adjusted summary satisfaction scores for provider satisfaction were not significantly lower for African Americans overall but were significant at two of six sites. Similarly, on the SAQ, adjusted treatment satisfaction scores were significantly lower for African Americans at half of the sites and minimally but not clinically significant overall.

Conclusions: Despite a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors, African-American patients with CAD who were treated in the VA system appeared to have a greater level of physical functioning, vitality, and angina stability. After adjustment for confounding demographic variables, however, these differences were not consistently significant at all geographic locations. This suggests that many other sociodemographic variables, in addition to ethnicity, influence apparent discrepancies in quality of life, satisfaction, and angina.

References

    1. JAMA. 2001 Jan 17;285(3):297-303
    1. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(7):829-39
    1. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):879-88
    1. Med Care. 1975 Aug;13(8):648-58
    1. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724-35
    1. JAMA. 1989 Aug 18;262(7):907-13
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(7):811-8
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Jul;39(7):691-4
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 26;329(9):621-7
    1. Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):1-14
    1. JAMA. 1994 Apr 20;271(15):1175-80
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):333-41
    1. Am J Public Health. 1995 Mar;85(3):345-51
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 May 15;141(10):960-72
    1. Med Care. 1995 Nov;33(11):1120-31
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jun 10;156(11):1181-8
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;78(9):996-1001
    1. N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 13;336(7):480-6
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Mar 15;79(6):722-6
    1. Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):300-10
    1. Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):325-34
    1. Am Heart J. 2000 Jul;140(1):105-10
    1. Circulation. 2000 Aug 8;102(6):642-8
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Apr;12(4):237-42
    1. Chest. 1997 Sep;112(3):614-22
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Oct;30(4):901-7
    1. Med Care. 1997 Dec;35(12):1173-89
    1. Med Care. 1998 Feb;36(2):155-66
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):626-32
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 1;82(9):1019-23
    1. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 25;340(8):618-26
    1. Am Heart J. 1999 Apr;137(4 Pt 1):706-13
    1. JAMA. 1999 Apr 14;281(14):1298-303
    1. JAMA. 1999 Aug 11;282(6):583-9

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe