Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib in sorafenib pretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression

Thomas Decaens, Carlo Barone, Eric Assenat, Martin Wermke, Angelica Fasolo, Philippe Merle, Jean-Frédéric Blanc, Véronique Grando, Angelo Iacobellis, Erica Villa, Joerg Trojan, Josef Straub, Rolf Bruns, Karin Berghoff, Juergen Scheele, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre, Thomas Decaens, Carlo Barone, Eric Assenat, Martin Wermke, Angelica Fasolo, Philippe Merle, Jean-Frédéric Blanc, Véronique Grando, Angelo Iacobellis, Erica Villa, Joerg Trojan, Josef Straub, Rolf Bruns, Karin Berghoff, Juergen Scheele, Eric Raymond, Sandrine Faivre

Abstract

Background: This Phase 1b/2 study evaluated tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, in US/European patients with sorafenib pretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression.

Methods: Eligible adults had aHCC, progression after ≥4 weeks of sorafenib, and, for Phase 2 only, MET overexpression. Tepotinib was administered once daily at 300 or 500 mg in Phase 1b ('3 + 3' design), and at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in Phase 2. Primary endpoints were dose-liming toxicities (DLTs; Phase 1b) and 12-week investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; Phase 2).

Results: In Phase 1b (n = 17), no DLTs occurred and the RP2D was confirmed as 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 49), the primary endpoint was met: 12-week PFS was 63.3% (90% CI: 50.5-74.7), which was significantly greater than the predefined null hypothesis of ≤15% (one-sided binomial exact test: P < 0.0001). Median time to progression was 4 months. In Phase 2, 28.6% of patients had treatment-related Grade ≥3 adverse events, including peripheral oedema and lipase increase (both 6.1%).

Conclusions: Tepotinib was generally well tolerated and the RP2D (500 mg) showed promising efficacy and, therefore, a positive benefit-risk balance in sorafenib pretreated aHCC with MET overexpression.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02115373.

Conflict of interest statement

T.D. provided consulting for Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Bayer, Eisai and Becton Dickinson; received research grants from Genoscience and ArQule, and travel grants from Merck. C.B. attended speaker’s bureau for Servier; received research grants from Merck-Serono and travel grants from Daiichi-Sankyo. P.M. has participated in advisory boards for Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, Ipsen, Lilly, Onxeo, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme. J.-F.B. has provided consulting for Bayer, Ipsen, Eisai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche and AstraZeneca. J.T. has participated in advisory boards and speakers’ bureau for Merck-Serono, Roche, Lilly, Eisai and Ipsen, and received travel grants from Roche. E.R. has provided consulting for Genoscience and SCOR, and holds stocks with both companies. S.F. has participated in advisory boards for Bayer, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck-Serono and Roche, and attended speakers’ bureau for Bayer, Eisai and Ipsen. E.A., M.W., A.F., V.G., A.I. and E.V. have nothing to disclose. J.S., R.B. and K.B. are employees of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and hold stock with the company. J.Sc. is an employee of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Percentage of patients progression free…
Fig. 1. Percentage of patients progression free at 12 weeks according to investigator assessment in Phase 2.
Data are shown for the overall population and patient subgroups.aModerate (2+) or strong (3+) staining intensity for MET on IHC in the majority (≥50%) of tumour cells; bMET amplification defined as MET:CEP7 ratio ≥2 or mean gene copy number ≥5; cAFP was missing for two patients (12-week PFS in these patients was 100%). AFP alpha-fetoprotein; CI confidence interval, EHS extrahepatic spread, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, IHC immunohistochemistry, PFS progression-free survival.
Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS, TTP…
Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS, TTP and OS in Phase 2.
a Investigator-assessed PFS, b investigator-assessed TTP, c OS. CI confidence interval, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, TTP time to progression.
Fig. 3. Best relative change in target…
Fig. 3. Best relative change in target lesions in Phase 2.
Shading indicates MET IHC status: 2+ (white) or 3+ (black). Patients with MET amplification are labelled. Inset table shows overall response and disease control rates. aModerate (2+) or strong (3+) staining intensity for MET on IHC in the majority (≥50%) of tumour cells; MET amplification defined as MET:CEP7 ratio ≥2 or mean gene copy number ≥5. CI confidence interval, DCR disease control rate, IHC immunohistochemistry, ORR objective response rate, SOLD sum of longest diameter.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492.
    1. Llovet JM, Zucman-Rossi J, Pikarsky E, Sangro B, Schwartz M, Sherman M, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2:16018. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.18.
    1. Yang JD, Hainaut P, Gores GJ, Amadou A, Plymoth A, Roberts LR. A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16:589–604. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y.
    1. Park JW, Chen M, Colombo M, Roberts LR, Schwartz M, Chen PJ, et al. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: the BRIDGE Study. Liver Int. 2015;35:2155–2166. doi: 10.1111/liv.12818.
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 69, 182–236 (2018).
    1. Bruix J, da Fonseca LG, Reig M. Insights into the success and failure of systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16:617–630. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0179-x.
    1. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:378–390. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857.
    1. Cheng A-L, Kang Y-K, Chen Z, Tsao C-J, Qin S, Kim JS, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:25–34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7.
    1. Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:1163–1173. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.
    1. Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, Granito A, Huang YH, Bodoky G, et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:56–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32453-9.
    1. Kelley RK, Cheng A-L, Braiteh FS, Park J-W, Benzaghou F, Milwee S, et al. Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) versus sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:TPS4157. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.TPS4157.
    1. Abou-Alfa GK, Meyer T, Cheng A-L, El-Khoueiry AB, Rimassa L, Ryoo B-Y, et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:54–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1717002.
    1. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1894–1905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915745.
    1. Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, Cattan S, Ogasawara S, Palmer D, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:940–952. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30351-6.
    1. Finn RS, Ryoo B-Y, Merle P, Kudo M, Bouattour M, Lim HY, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:193–202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01307.
    1. El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, Crocenzi TS, Kudo M, Hsu C, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2492–2502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31046-2.
    1. Yau T, Kang Y-K, Kim T-Y, El-Khoueiry AB, Santoro A, Sangro B, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib: the CheckMate 040 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:e204564. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4564.
    1. Bouattour M, Raymond E, Qin S, Cheng A-L, Stammberger U, Locatelli G, et al. Recent developments of c-Met as a therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67:1132–1149. doi: 10.1002/hep.29496.
    1. Rimassa L, Abbadessa G, Personeni N, Porta C, Borbath I, Daniele B, et al. Tumor and circulating biomarkers in patients with second-line hepatocellular carcinoma from the randomized phase 2 study with tivantinib. Oncotarget. 2016;7:72622–72633. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11621.
    1. Cascone T, Xu L, Lin HY, Liu W, Tran HT, Liu Y, et al. The HGF/c-MET pathway is a driver and biomarker of VEGFR-inhibitor resistance and vascular remodeling in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:5489–5501. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3216.
    1. Daudigeos-Dubus E, Le Dret L, Bawa O, Opolon P, Vievard A, Villa I, et al. Dual inhibition using cabozantinib overcomes HGF/MET signaling mediated resistance to pan-VEGFR inhibition in orthotopic and metastatic neuroblastoma tumors. Int. J. Oncol. 2017;50:203–211. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3792.
    1. Zhou L, Liu XD, Sun M, Zhang X, German P, Bai S, et al. Targeting MET and AXL overcomes resistance to sunitinib therapy in renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2016;35:2687–2697. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.343.
    1. Santoro A, Rimassa L, Borbath I, Daniele B, Salvagni S, Van Laethem JL, et al. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:55–63. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70490-4.
    1. Falchook GS, Kurzrock R, Amin HM, Xiong W, Fu S, Piha-Paul SA, et al. First-in-man phase 1 trial of the selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:1237–1246. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2860.
    1. Paik PK, Felip E, Veillon R, Sakai H, Cortot AB, Garassino MC, et al. Tepotinib in non-small-cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping mutations. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:931–943. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004407.
    1. Bladt F, Friese-Hamim M, Ihling C, Wilm C, Blaukat A. The c-Met inhibitor MSC2156119J effectively inhibits tumor growth in liver cancer models. Cancers (Basel) 2014;6:1736–1752. doi: 10.3390/cancers6031736.
    1. Wu YL, Cheng Y, Zhou J, Lu S, Zhang Y, Zhao J, et al. Tepotinib plus gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer with MET overexpression or MET amplification and acquired resistance to previous EGFR inhibitor (INSIGHT study): an open-label, phase 1b/2, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Res. Med. 2020;8:1132–1143. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30154-5.
    1. Ryoo BY, Ren Z, Kim TY, Pan H, Rau KM, Choi HJ, et al. Phase 2 trial of tepotinib vs sorafenib in Asian patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:viii207. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy282.005.
    1. Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin. Liver Dis. 2010;30:52–60. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132.
    1. Shitara K, Yamazaki K, Tsushima T, Naito T, Matsubara N, Watanabe M, et al. Phase 1 trial of the MET inhibitor tepotinib in Japanese patients with solid tumors. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;50:859–866. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa042.
    1. Qin S, Chan SL, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Han G, Choo SP, Sriuranpong V, et al. A phase 2 study of the efficacy and safety of the MET inhibitor capmatinib (INC280) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919889001. doi: 10.1177/1758835919889001.
    1. Moosavi F, Giovannetti E, Saso L, Firuzi O. HGF/MET pathway aberrations as diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in human cancers. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2019;56:533–566. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1653821.
    1. Noda Y, Kawaguchi T, Kuromatsu R, Komukai S, Nakano M, Niizeki T, et al. Prognostic profile of patients with non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma using data mining analysis. Oncol. Lett. 2019;18:227–236.
    1. Brar G, McNeel T, McGlynn K, Graubard B, Floudas C, Pia Morelli M, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) survival by etiology: A SEER-Medicare database analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:201. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.201.
    1. Bai D-S, Zhang C, Chen P, Jin S-J, Jiang G-Q. The prognostic correlation of AFP level at diagnosis with pathological grade, progression, and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:12870. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12834-1.
    1. Kelley RK, Meyer T, Rimassa L, Merle P, Park J-W, Yau T, et al. Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels and clinical outcomes in the Phase 3 CELESTIAL study of cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:4795–4804. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3884.
    1. Ryoo, B.-Y., Cheng, A.-L., Ren, Z., Kim, T.-Y. Pan, H., Rau, K.-M. et al. Randomised Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib vs sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression. Br J Cancer. 10.1038/s41416-021-01380-3 (2021).
    1. TEPMETKO® (tepotinib) Japanese Package Insert. March 2020 revision.
    1. Zhu AX, Park JO, Ryoo BY, Yen CJ, Poon R, Pastorelli D, et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:859–870. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00050-9.
    1. Rimassa L, Assenat E, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Pracht M, Zagonel V, Mathurin P, et al. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of MET-high, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (METIV-HCC): a final analysis of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:682–693. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30146-3.
    1. Kudo M, Morimoto M, Moriguchi M, Izumi N, Takayama T, Yoshiji H, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of tivantinib in Japanese patients with MET-high hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2020;111:3759–3769. doi: 10.1111/cas.14582.
    1. TECENTRIQ® (atezolizumab) US Prescribing Information. November 2020 revision.
    1. Yau T, Park J, Finn R, Cheng AL, Mathurin P, Edeline J, et al. CheckMate 459: a randomized, multi-center phase 3 study of nivolumab (NIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:v874–v875. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz394.029.
    1. Cheng H, Sun G, Chen H, Li Y, Han Z, Zhang P, et al. Trends in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy and related combination therapies. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2019;9:1536–1545.
    1. Papaccio F, Della Corte CM, Viscardi G, Di Liello R, Esposito G, Sparano F, et al. HGF/MET and the immune system: relevance for cancer immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:3595. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113595.
    1. Kelley RK, J WO, Hazra S, Benzaghou F, Yau T, Cheng AL, et al. Cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab versus sorafenib in treatment-naive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: COSMIC-312 Phase 3 study design. Future Oncol. 2020;16:1525–1536. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0283.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe