Diet, physical activity, and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obesity in preschool children up to the age of 6 years

Jill L Colquitt, Emma Loveman, Claire O'Malley, Liane B Azevedo, Emma Mead, Lena Al-Khudairy, Louisa J Ells, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Karen Rees, Jill L Colquitt, Emma Loveman, Claire O'Malley, Liane B Azevedo, Emma Mead, Lena Al-Khudairy, Louisa J Ells, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Karen Rees

Abstract

Background: Child overweight and obesity has increased globally, and can be associated with short- and long-term health consequences.

Objectives: To assess the effects of diet, physical activity, and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obesity in preschool children up to the age of 6 years.

Search methods: We performed a systematic literature search in the databases Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and LILACS, as well as in the trial registers ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP Search Portal. We also checked references of identified trials and systematic reviews. We applied no language restrictions. The date of the last search was March 2015 for all databases.

Selection criteria: We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of diet, physical activity, and behavioural interventions for treating overweight or obesity in preschool children aged 0 to 6 years.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias, evaluated the overall quality of the evidence using the GRADE instrument, and extracted data following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We contacted trial authors for additional information.

Main results: We included 7 RCTs with a total of 923 participants: 529 randomised to an intervention and 394 to a comparator. The number of participants per trial ranged from 18 to 475. Six trials were parallel RCTs, and one was a cluster RCT. Two trials were three-arm trials, each comparing two interventions with a control group. The interventions and comparators in the trials varied. We categorised the comparisons into two groups: multicomponent interventions and dietary interventions. The overall quality of the evidence was low or very low, and six trials had a high risk of bias on individual 'Risk of bias' criteria. The children in the included trials were followed up for between six months and three years.In trials comparing a multicomponent intervention with usual care, enhanced usual care, or information control, we found a greater reduction in body mass index (BMI) z score in the intervention groups at the end of the intervention (6 to 12 months): mean difference (MD) -0.3 units (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.4 to -0.2); P < 0.00001; 210 participants; 4 trials; low-quality evidence, at 12 to 18 months' follow-up: MD -0.4 units (95% CI -0.6 to -0.2); P = 0.0001; 202 participants; 4 trials; low-quality evidence, and at 2 years' follow-up: MD -0.3 units (95% CI -0.4 to -0.1); 96 participants; 1 trial; low-quality evidence.One trial stated that no adverse events were reported; the other trials did not report on adverse events. Three trials reported health-related quality of life and found improvements in some, but not all, aspects. Other outcomes, such as behaviour change and parent-child relationship, were inconsistently measured.One three-arm trial of very low-quality evidence comparing two types of diet with control found that both the dairy-rich diet (BMI z score change MD -0.1 units (95% CI -0.11 to -0.09); P < 0.0001; 59 participants) and energy-restricted diet (BMI z score change MD -0.1 units (95% CI -0.11 to -0.09); P < 0.0001; 57 participants) resulted in greater reduction in BMI than the comparator at the end of the intervention period, but only the dairy-rich diet maintained this at 36 months' follow-up (BMI z score change in MD -0.7 units (95% CI -0.71 to -0.69); P < 0.0001; 52 participants). The energy-restricted diet had a worse BMI outcome than control at this follow-up (BMI z score change MD 0.1 units (95% CI 0.09 to 0.11); P < 0.0001; 47 participants). There was no substantial difference in mean daily energy expenditure between groups. Health-related quality of life, adverse effects, participant views, and parenting were not measured.No trial reported on all-cause mortality, morbidity, or socioeconomic effects.All results should be interpreted cautiously due to their low quality and heterogeneous interventions and comparators.

Authors' conclusions: Muticomponent interventions appear to be an effective treatment option for overweight or obese preschool children up to the age of 6 years. However, the current evidence is limited, and most trials had a high risk of bias. Most trials did not measure adverse events. We have identified four ongoing trials that we will include in future updates of this review.The role of dietary interventions is more equivocal, with one trial suggesting that dairy interventions may be effective in the longer term, but not energy-restricted diets. This trial also had a high risk of bias.

Conflict of interest statement

JC: none known.

EL: none known.

COM: none known.

LA: none known.

EM: none known.

LAl‐K: none known.

LE: none known.

MIM: none known.

KR: none known.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials (blank cells indicate that the particular outcome was not investigated in some trials).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study (blank cells indicate that the study did not report that particular outcome).
Analysis 1.1
Analysis 1.1
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 1 Changes in BMI z score.
Analysis 1.2
Analysis 1.2
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 2 Changes in BMI.
Analysis 1.3
Analysis 1.3
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 3 Changes in % over BMI.
Analysis 1.4
Analysis 1.4
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 4 Changes in BMI percentile.
Analysis 1.5
Analysis 1.5
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 5 Changes in body weight.
Analysis 1.6
Analysis 1.6
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 6 Changes in parental BMI.
Analysis 1.7
Analysis 1.7
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 7 Changes in parental weight.
Analysis 1.10
Analysis 1.10
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 10 Changes in health‐related quality of life: PEDsQL physical functioning.
Analysis 1.11
Analysis 1.11
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 11 Changes in health‐related quality of life: PEDsQL total score.
Analysis 1.12
Analysis 1.12
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 12 Changes in waist circumference.
Analysis 1.13
Analysis 1.13
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 13 Changes in waist circumference z‐score.
Analysis 1.14
Analysis 1.14
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 14 Changes in hip circumference.
Analysis 1.15
Analysis 1.15
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 15 Changes in hip circumference z‐score.
Analysis 1.16
Analysis 1.16
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 16 Changes in upper arm circumference.
Analysis 1.17
Analysis 1.17
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 17 Changes in per cent body fat.
Analysis 1.18
Analysis 1.18
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 18 Changes in fat‐free mass.
Analysis 1.19
Analysis 1.19
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 19 Changes in visceral fat.
Analysis 1.20
Analysis 1.20
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 20 Changes in subcutaneous fat.
Analysis 1.21
Analysis 1.21
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 21 Changes in outdoor active play.
Analysis 1.22
Analysis 1.22
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 22 Changes in steps.
Analysis 1.23
Analysis 1.23
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 23 Changes in physical activity, moderate.
Analysis 1.24
Analysis 1.24
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 24 Changes in physical activity, vigorous.
Analysis 1.25
Analysis 1.25
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 25 Changes in sugar‐sweetened drinks.
Analysis 1.26
Analysis 1.26
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 26 Changes in fruit and vegetable intake.
Analysis 1.27
Analysis 1.27
Comparison 1 Multicomponent intervention versus control, Outcome 27 Changes in TV and video viewing.
Analysis 2.1
Analysis 2.1
Comparison 2 Diet intervention versus control, Outcome 1 Changes in BMI z score.
Analysis 2.2
Analysis 2.2
Comparison 2 Diet intervention versus control, Outcome 2 Changes in waist circumference.
Analysis 2.3
Analysis 2.3
Comparison 2 Diet intervention versus control, Outcome 3 Changes in per cent body fat.

Source: PubMed

3
Subscribe