Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation

Roberto Colombo, Fabrizio Pisano, Alessandra Mazzone, Carmen Delconte, Silvestro Micera, M Chiara Carrozza, Paolo Dario, Giuseppe Minuco, Roberto Colombo, Fabrizio Pisano, Alessandra Mazzone, Carmen Delconte, Silvestro Micera, M Chiara Carrozza, Paolo Dario, Giuseppe Minuco

Abstract

Background: Motivation is an important factor in rehabilitation and frequently used as a determinant of rehabilitation outcome. Several factors can influence patient motivation and so improve exercise adherence. This paper presents the design of two robot devices for use in the rehabilitation of upper limb movements, that can motivate patients during the execution of the assigned motor tasks by enhancing the gaming aspects of rehabilitation. In addition, a regular review of the obtained performance can reinforce in patients' minds the importance of exercising and encourage them to continue, so improving their motivation and consequently adherence to the program. In view of this, we also developed an evaluation metric that could characterize the rate of improvement and quantify the changes in the obtained performance.

Methods: Two groups (G1, n = 8 and G2, n = 12) of patients with chronic stroke were enrolled in a 3-week rehabilitation program including standard physical therapy (45 min. daily) plus treatment by means of robot devices (40 min., twice daily) respectively for wrist (G1) and elbow-shoulder movements (G2). Both groups were evaluated by means of standard clinical assessment scales and the new robot measured evaluation metric. Patients' motivation was assessed in 9/12 G2 patients by means of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) questionnaire.

Results: Both groups reduced their motor deficit and showed a significant improvement in clinical scales and the robot measured parameters. The IMI assessed in G2 patients showed high scores for interest, usefulness and importance subscales and low values for tension and pain subscales.

Conclusion: Thanks to the design features of the two robot devices the therapist could easily adapt training to the individual by selecting different difficulty levels of the motor task tailored to each patient's disability. The gaming aspects incorporated in the two rehabilitation robots helped maintain patients' interest high during execution of the assigned tasks by providing feedback on performance. The evaluation metric gave a precise measure of patients' performance and thus provides a tool to help therapists promote patient motivation and hence adherence to the training program.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a) One degree of freedom (DoF) robot device for wrist rehabilitation. b) Two DoF robot device for elbow-shoulder rehabilitation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time course of the robot measured parameters in a representative patient treated by the wrist rehabilitation device.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time course of the robot measured parameters in a representative patient treated by the elbow-shoulder rehabilitation device.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Single subject analysis for the AMI and Mean Velocity parameters. Each bar reports the mean value obtained by the patient at the 3rd training session (hatched area) and the change obtained at the end of treatment (dotted area = significant change, white area = non significant change).

References

    1. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998;6:75–87. doi: 10.1109/86.662623.
    1. Volpe B, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OTRL, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54:1938–1944.
    1. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabi. 2004;85:1106–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.028.
    1. Burgar CG, Lum PS, Shor PC, Machiel Van der Loos HF. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:663–673.
    1. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:952–959. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.33101.
    1. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ. Assessment of active and passive restraint during guided reaching after chronic brain injury. Ann Biomed Eng. 1999;27:805–814. doi: 10.1114/1.233.
    1. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:915–20. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04954-7.
    1. Loureiro R, Amirabdollahian F, Topping M, Driessen B, Harwin W. Upper Limb Robot Mediated Stroke Therapy Gentle/s Approach. Autonomous Robots. 2003;15:35–51. doi: 10.1023/A:1024436732030.
    1. Patton JL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51:636–646. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.821035.
    1. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation. BMJ. 2000;321:1051–1054. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1051.
    1. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation. A quantitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke. 2002;33:444–448. doi: 10.1161/hs0202.102367.
    1. Sabari JS. Motor learning concepts applied to activity-based intervention with adults with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Therapy. 1991;45:523–530.
    1. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Carrozza MC, Dario P, Minuco G. Robotic Techniques for Upper Limb Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients. IEEE Trans on Neural Sys Rehab Eng. 2005;13:311–324. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848352.
    1. Micera S, Carrozza MC, Guglielmelli E, Cappiello G, Zaccone F, Freschi C, Colombo R, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Pisano F, Minuco G, Dario P. A Simple Robotic System for Neurorehabilitation. Autonomous Robots. 2005;19:271–284. doi: 10.1007/s10514-005-4749-0.
    1. Chen CY, Neufeld PS, Feely CA, Skinner CS. Factors influencing compliance with home exercise programs among patients with upper-extremity impairment. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:171–80.
    1. Friedrich M, Gittler G, Halberstadt Y, Cermak T, Heiller I. Combined exercise and motivation program: effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:475–87. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90059-4.
    1. Meichenbaum D, Turk DC. Facilitating treatment adherence: a practitioner's guidebook. New York: Plenum; 1987.
    1. Becker MH. Patient adherence to prescribed therapies. Med Care. 1985;23:539–555. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198505000-00014.
    1. Oldridge NB. Compliance and exercise in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a review. Prev Med. 1982;11:56–70. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(82)90005-6.
    1. Campbell R, Evans M, Tucker M, Quilty B, Dieppe P, Donovan JL. Why don't patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:132–138. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.132.
    1. Mayo NE. Patient compliance: practical implications for physical therapists. A review of the literature. Phys The. 1978;58:1083–90. Review.
    1. Ryan RM. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. J Personality and Social Psychology. 1982;43:450–461. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450.
    1. Deci EL, Eghrari H, Patrick BC, Leone DR. Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. J Pers. 1994;62:119–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x.
    1. Plant RW, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally controlling styles. Journal of Personality. 1985;53:435–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00375.x.
    1. Self-Determination Theory: An approach to human motivation and personality-Questionnaires, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
    1. McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quartely for Exercise and Sport. 1987;60:48–58.
    1. Loureiro RCV, Johnson MJ, Harwin WS. Proceedings of first IEEE/RAS-EMBS Int Conf on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BIOROB 2006) Pisa, Italy; Collaborative Tele-rehabilitation: A Strategy for Increasing Engagement.
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman L, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. Scand. J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
    1. Lindmark B, Hamrin E. Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Validation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;20:111–115.
    1. Gregson JM, Leathley MJ, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK, Watkins CL. Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 2000;29:223–8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/29.3.223.
    1. Morasso P, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Trajectory formation in handwriting: a computational model. Biol Cybern. 1982;45:131–142. doi: 10.1007/BF00335240.
    1. Roher B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neuroscience. 2002;22:8297–8304.
    1. Ryan RM, Koestner R, Deci EL. Varied Forms of persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation & Emotion. 1991;15:185–205. doi: 10.1007/BF00995170.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. Cook AM, Meng MQ, Gu JJ, Howery K. Development of a robotic device for facilitating learning by children who have severe disabilities. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2002;10:178–87. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2002.802877.
    1. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:171–84. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0076.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

3
Subscribe